Krista L. Hiner
Intellectual Property · Minneapolis · Non-California County
Bar #323826 · Admitted 2018
Identity verified · View the record →
Indexed from official State Bar of California records · Identity verification · Updated regularly
Answer FileIntellectual Property
Thirty days from the application's publication in the USPTO Official Gazette (15 U.S.C. § 1063), with extensions of time available on request to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. After a mark registers, the remedy shifts to a cancellation petition under 15 U.S.C. § 1064: with most grounds cut off five years after registration.
Opposition runs on the USPTO's calendar, not the challenger's. When an examining attorney approves a federal application, it is published in the Official Gazette, and anyone who believes registration would damage them has 30 days to oppose before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (15 U.S.C. § 1063); extensions of time are routinely available but must be requested within the window. An opposition is a litigation-like proceeding on paper (pleadings, discovery, and briefing) usually founded on likelihood of confusion with an earlier mark. Miss the window and the fight gets harder: after registration the challenge becomes a petition to cancel under 15 U.S.C. § 1064, and once the registration turns five years old, most grounds, including ordinary likelihood of confusion, fall away, leaving narrower theories such as abandonment, fraud, or genericness. Because no one is notified personally when a confusingly similar mark is published, brand owners commonly use watch services to monitor the Gazette. Deadlines this short reward monitoring, not luck.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. § 1063
Source: 15 U.S.C. § 1063 · Checked: · Maintained by the California Attorney Registry from official State Bar of California records. Legal information, not legal advice.
Intellectual Property · Minneapolis · Non-California County
Bar #323826 · Admitted 2018
Identity verified · View the record →
Intellectual Property · Los Angeles · Los Angeles County
Bar #366321 · Admitted 2025
Identity verified · View the record →
Intellectual Property · San Diego · San Diego County
Bar #84423 · Admitted 1978
Identity verified · View the record →
Intellectual Property · Sacramento · Sacramento County
Bar #243746 · Admitted 2006
Taking new clients (attorney stated)
Identity verified · View the record →
Intellectual Property · Torrance · Los Angeles County
Bar #355141 · Admitted 2024
Speaks Spanish, Persian, French, Japanese, Tagalog, Vietnamese · Taking new clients (attorney stated)
Identity verified · View the record →
Intellectual Property · Portola Vally · San Mateo County
Bar #115183 · Admitted 1984
Identity verified · View the record →
Intellectual Property · Beverly Hills · Los Angeles County
Bar #343974 · Admitted 2022
Identity verified · View the record →
Intellectual Property · Brookline · Non-California County
Bar #347517 · Admitted 2022
Identity verified · View the record →
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Court self-help, legal-aid organizations and attorney-stated fee options, with source links. No account or case submission is needed to use them.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records