Attorney RecordSan Diego County
Alan M. Mansfield · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Alan M. Mansfield is on California’s State Bar roll, #125998, admitted in 1986; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Diego, San Diego County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Consumer Protection and Litigation. 24 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a consumer protection matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #125998 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1986 |
| Law school | Univ of Denver |
| Firm | Consumer Law Group of California |
| Location | San Diego, San Diego County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucido v. Nestle Purina Petcare Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 217 F. Supp. 3d 1098 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 November 2016 |
| Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC | Counsel for the plaintiff | 564 F. App'x 332 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 March 2014 |
| Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC | Counsel for the plaintiff | 741 F.3d 29 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 January 2014 |
| Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC | Counsel for the respondent | 58 Cal. 4th 329 | California Supreme Court | 19 December 2013 |
| Steven Nakash v. Nvidia Corporation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 539 F. App'x 822 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 September 2013 |
| In re iPhone Application Litig. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 844 F. Supp. 2d 1040 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 June 2012 |
| Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC | Counsel for the respondent | 661 F.3d 1199 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 October 2011 |
| White v. Countrywide Financial Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 277 F.R.D. 586 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 11 October 2011 |
| Webb v. Carter's Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 272 F.R.D. 489 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 3 February 2011 |
| United Food & Commercial Workers Central Pennsylvania & Regional Health & Welfare Fund v. Amgen, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 400 F. App'x 255 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 October 2010 |
| Utility Consumers' Action Network v. Sprint Solutions, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 259 F.R.D. 484 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 23 June 2009 |
| Garrett v. City of Escondido | Counsel for the plaintiff | 465 F. Supp. 2d 1043 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 20 November 2006 |
| Jerry Beeman Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. Tdi Managed Care | Counsel for the appellant | 449 F.3d 1035 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 June 2006 |
| Lynch v. California Public Utilities Commission | Counsel for the appellant | 171 F. App'x 581 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 March 2006 |
| Lynch v. California Public Utilities Commission | Counsel for the appellant | 342 F. App'x 581 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 March 2006 |
| Lynch v. California Public Utilities Commission | Counsel for the appellant | 342 F. App'x 581 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 March 2006 |
| Lynch v. California Public Utilities Commission | Counsel for the appellant | 311 B.R. 798 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 15 July 2004 |
| Schwartz v. Upper Deck Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 104 F. Supp. 2d 1228 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 21 June 2000 |
| Dumas v. Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 52 F. Supp. 2d 1170 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 14 May 1999 |
| Schwartz v. Upper Deck Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 183 F.R.D. 672 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 12 January 1999 |
| Foothill Capital Corp. v. Clare's Food Market, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 113 F.3d 1091 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 1997 |
| Foothill Capital Corp. v. Clare's Food Market, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3774 | California Supreme Court | 20 May 1997 |
| Allman v. Philip Morris, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 865 F. Supp. 665 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 22 September 1994 |
| Johnson v. Hui | Counsel for the plaintiff | 811 F. Supp. 479 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 5 September 1991 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Consumer Law Group of California.
A firm or employer website answers at clgca.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is University of Denver.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1986 · 40 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Consumer Protection and Litigation.
24 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Diego, in San Diego County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, seated at San Diego.
Confirm Alan M. Mansfield’s license status, bar number #125998, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Diego County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records