Attorney RecordCriminal Defense · San Diego County
Amanda L.C. Lloyd · Criminal Defense Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Amanda L.C. Lloyd is on California’s State Bar roll, #239682, admitted in 2005; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Diego, San Diego County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Criminal Defense. 36 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is California Attorney General's Office. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a criminal defense matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #239682 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 2005 |
| Law school | Seton Hall Univ |
| Firm | California Attorney General's Office |
| Location | San Diego, San Diego County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In re Lambirth | Counsel for the respondent | 5 Cal. App. 5th 915 | California Court of Appeal | 21 November 2016 |
| Sergio Gonzalez v. Edmund G. Brown | Counsel for the respondent | 586 F. App'x 423 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 December 2014 |
| In re LeBlanc CA1/1 | Counsel for the respondent | 226 Cal. App. 4th 452 | California Court of Appeal | 30 April 2014 |
| In re Martinez | Counsel for the respondent | 216 Cal. App. 4th 1141 | California Court of Appeal | 31 May 2013 |
| In re Shigemura | Counsel for the respondent | 210 Cal. App. 4th 440 | California Court of Appeal | 27 September 2012 |
| Charles Clemans, Jr. v. James Yates | Counsel for the respondent | 468 F. App'x 732 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 February 2012 |
| Gustavo Gomez v. Matthew Cate | Counsel for the respondent | 459 F. App'x 665 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 November 2011 |
| Eduardo Roman v. John Salazar | Counsel for the respondent | 461 F. App'x 532 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 July 2011 |
| De La Cruz v. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 443 F. App'x 288 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 July 2011 |
| D'Agostin v. Hernandez | Counsel for the respondent | 440 F. App'x 598 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 June 2011 |
| Sesma v. Neotti | Counsel for the respondent | 439 F. App'x 657 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 June 2011 |
| Robert Mendoza v. Robert Hernandez | Counsel for the appellant | 431 F. App'x 604 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 May 2011 |
| Tony Aremu v. B. Curry | Counsel for the respondent | 430 F. App'x 562 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 April 2011 |
| David Murr v. John Marshall | Counsel for the appellant | 428 F. App'x 670 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 April 2011 |
| Mark Delaplane v. John Marshall | Counsel for the appellant | 428 F. App'x 669 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 April 2011 |
| Jackson v. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 422 F. App'x 568 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 March 2011 |
| Dehaven v. Tilton | Counsel for the respondent | 401 F. App'x 264 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 October 2010 |
| Haugen v. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 740 F. Supp. 2d 1150 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 22 September 2010 |
| Jeremy Gauthier v. Debra Herndon | Counsel for the respondent | 390 F. App'x 711 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 August 2010 |
| In Re Prather | Counsel for the respondent | 50 Cal. 4th 238 | California Supreme Court | 29 July 2010 |
| In Re Torres | Counsel for the respondent | 186 Cal. App. 4th 909 | California Court of Appeal | 15 July 2010 |
| Rubio v. Harrison | Counsel for the respondent | 362 F. App'x 886 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 January 2010 |
| Rubio v. Harrison | Counsel for the respondent | 362 F. App'x 886 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 January 2010 |
| Millan v. MARSHAL | Counsel for the respondent | 677 F. Supp. 2d 1217 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 28 November 2009 |
| Murr v. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 673 F. Supp. 2d 1028 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 25 November 2009 |
| Renfrow v. Adams | Counsel for the respondent | 332 F. App'x 422 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 August 2009 |
| Renfrow v. Adams | Counsel for the respondent | 332 F. App'x 422 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 August 2009 |
| Tidwell v. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 620 F. Supp. 2d 1098 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 13 May 2009 |
| In Re Tokhmanian | Counsel for the appellant | 168 Cal. App. 4th 1270 | California Court of Appeal | 4 December 2008 |
| In re Shaputis | Counsel for the respondent | 44 Cal. 4th 1241 | California Supreme Court | 21 August 2008 |
| Gauthier v. Dexter | Counsel for the respondent | 573 F. Supp. 2d 1282 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 19 August 2008 |
| Abraham v. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 288 F. App'x 378 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2008 |
| Washington v. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 272 F. App'x 634 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 April 2008 |
| Tidwell v. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 526 F. Supp. 2d 1031 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 30 November 2007 |
| In Re Jacobson | Counsel for the appellant | 154 Cal. App. 4th 849 | California Court of Appeal | 28 August 2007 |
| In Re Wen Lee | Counsel for the respondent | 143 Cal. App. 4th 1400 | California Court of Appeal | 17 October 2006 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is California Attorney General's Office.
The law school on the record is Seton Hall University.
Admitted to the California Bar in 2005 · 21 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Criminal Defense.
36 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Diego, in San Diego County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, seated at San Diego.
Confirm Amanda L.C. Lloyd’s license status, bar number #239682, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Criminal Defense in San Diego County: next on the roll
San Diego County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records