Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Amber N. Wipfler · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Amber N. Wipfler is on California’s State Bar roll, #238484, admitted in 2005; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 31 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is CA Office of the Attorney General. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #238484 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 2005 |
| Law school | Univ of San Francisco |
| Firm | CA Office of the Attorney General |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing in San Francisco County
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In re Butler | Counsel for the respondent | 4 Cal. 5th 728 | California Supreme Court | 2 April 2018 |
| In re Gomez CA1/2 | Counsel for the respondent | 246 Cal. App. 4th 1082 | California Court of Appeal | 25 March 2016 |
| In re Butler | Counsel for the respondent | 236 Cal. App. 4th 1222 | California Court of Appeal | 15 May 2015 |
| In re Stoneroad | Counsel for the respondent | 215 Cal. App. 4th 596 | California Court of Appeal | 18 April 2013 |
| In re Hunter | Counsel for the respondent | 205 Cal. App. 4th 1529 | California Court of Appeal | 18 May 2012 |
| In re Morganti | Counsel for the appellant | 204 Cal. App. 4th 904 | California Court of Appeal | 28 March 2012 |
| Rouse v. Goughnour | Counsel for the respondent | 467 F. App'x 664 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 January 2012 |
| Kailash Chaudhary v. Board of Prison Terms | Counsel for the respondent | 451 F. App'x 703 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 October 2011 |
| McCottrell v. Ayers | Counsel for the respondent | 435 F. App'x 673 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 June 2011 |
| Lemieux v. Kane | Counsel for the respondent | 433 F. App'x 587 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 May 2011 |
| Ronald Foster v. M. Evans | Counsel for the respondent | 426 F. App'x 523 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 April 2011 |
| Nikooseresht v. Curry | Counsel for the appellant | 424 F. App'x 619 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 March 2011 |
| Agrio v. Kane | Counsel for the respondent | 420 F. App'x 725 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 March 2011 |
| Collier v. Schwarzenegger | Counsel for the respondent | 420 F. App'x 751 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 March 2011 |
| In re Rodriguez | Counsel for the respondent | 193 Cal. App. 4th 85 | California Court of Appeal | 1 March 2011 |
| Robert Fryburger v. Ben Curry | Counsel for the respondent | 411 F. App'x 108 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 2011 |
| Thelander v. Kane | Counsel for the appellant | 408 F. App'x 105 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 January 2011 |
| Sanchez v. Curry | Counsel for the respondent | 735 F. Supp. 2d 1178 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 25 August 2010 |
| Holder v. Curry | Counsel for the respondent | 826 F. Supp. 2d 1143 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 6 August 2010 |
| Parker v. Kane | Counsel for the respondent | 390 F. App'x 688 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 August 2010 |
| Omar Gay v. Mike Evans | Counsel for the respondent | 390 F. App'x 723 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 August 2010 |
| King v. Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 385 F. App'x 660 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 June 2010 |
| In Re Chaudhary | Counsel for the appellant | 172 Cal. App. 4th 32 | California Court of Appeal | 13 March 2009 |
| Board of Parole Hearings v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 170 Cal. App. 4th 104 | California Court of Appeal | 19 December 2008 |
| Ekdahl v. Ayers | Counsel for the respondent | 621 F. Supp. 2d 829 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 December 2008 |
| Lettier v. Ayers | Counsel for the respondent | 299 F. App'x 717 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 November 2008 |
| Jackson v. Evans | Counsel for the respondent | 286 F. App'x 516 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 August 2008 |
| McCright v. Horel | Counsel for the respondent | 284 F. App'x 508 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 July 2008 |
| In Re Bush | Counsel for the respondent | 161 Cal. App. 4th 133 | California Court of Appeal | 25 March 2008 |
| McCullough v. Kane | Counsel for the appellant | 630 F.3d 766 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 December 2007 |
| McElwee v. Kane | Counsel for the respondent | 228 F. App'x 782 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2007 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is CA Office of the Attorney General.
The law school on the record is University of San Francisco School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 2005 · 21 years on the roll.
31 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Amber N. Wipfler’s license status, bar number #238484, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records