Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Anya M. Binsacca · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Anya M. Binsacca is on California’s State Bar roll, #189613, admitted in 1997; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Constitutional Law and Government Law. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #189613 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1997 |
| Law school | Univ of California Berkeley |
| Firm | CA Attorney General's Office |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing in San Francisco County
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| People ex rel. City of Commerce v. Argumedo | Counsel for the appellant | 28 Cal. App. 5th 274 | California Court of Appeal | 17 October 2018 |
| In re Lira | Counsel for the respondent | 58 Cal. 4th 573 | California Supreme Court | 3 February 2014 |
| In re Martinez | Counsel for the respondent | 216 Cal. App. 4th 1141 | California Court of Appeal | 31 May 2013 |
| In re Stoneroad | Counsel for the respondent | 215 Cal. App. 4th 596 | California Court of Appeal | 18 April 2013 |
| In re Vicks | Counsel for the respondent | 56 Cal. 4th 274 | California Supreme Court | 4 March 2013 |
| In re Stevenson | Counsel for the respondent | 213 Cal. App. 4th 841 | California Court of Appeal | 9 January 2013 |
| In re Denham | Counsel for the respondent | 211 Cal. App. 4th 702 | California Court of Appeal | 5 December 2012 |
| In re Cabrera | Counsel for the respondent | 55 Cal. 4th 683 | California Supreme Court | 29 October 2012 |
| In re Shigemura | Counsel for the respondent | 210 Cal. App. 4th 440 | California Court of Appeal | 27 September 2012 |
| In re Morganti | Counsel for the appellant | 204 Cal. App. 4th 904 | California Court of Appeal | 28 March 2012 |
| In Re Shaputis | Counsel for the respondent | 53 Cal. 4th 192 | California Supreme Court | 29 December 2011 |
| Ochoa v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 199 Cal. App. 4th 1274 | California Court of Appeal | 13 October 2011 |
| In re Sampson | Counsel for the respondent | 197 Cal. App. 4th 1234 | California Court of Appeal | 30 June 2011 |
| In re Ryner | Counsel for the appellant | 196 Cal. App. 4th 533 | California Court of Appeal | 10 June 2011 |
| In re Copley | Counsel for the appellant | 196 Cal. App. 4th 427 | California Court of Appeal | 8 June 2011 |
| In re Borlik | Counsel for the appellant | 194 Cal. App. 4th 30 | California Court of Appeal | 6 April 2011 |
| Hopkins v. Hamlet | Counsel for the respondent | 420 F. App'x 750 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 March 2011 |
| In re Rodriguez | Counsel for the respondent | 193 Cal. App. 4th 85 | California Court of Appeal | 1 March 2011 |
| Schoenfeld v. Board of Parole Hearings | Counsel for the respondent | 191 Cal. App. 4th 1324 | California Court of Appeal | 29 December 2010 |
| In Re Jenkins | Counsel for the appellant | 50 Cal. 4th 1167 | California Supreme Court | 28 October 2010 |
| In Re Powell | Counsel for the respondent | 188 Cal. App. 4th 1530 | California Court of Appeal | 7 October 2010 |
| In Re Kler | Counsel for the respondent | 188 Cal. App. 4th 1399 | California Court of Appeal | 5 October 2010 |
| In Re Prather | Counsel for the respondent | 50 Cal. 4th 238 | California Supreme Court | 29 July 2010 |
| In Re Torres | Counsel for the respondent | 186 Cal. App. 4th 909 | California Court of Appeal | 15 July 2010 |
| In Re Furnace | Counsel for the respondent | 185 Cal. App. 4th 649 | California Court of Appeal | 11 June 2010 |
| In Re Shippman | Counsel for the respondent | 185 Cal. App. 4th 446 | California Court of Appeal | 8 June 2010 |
| In Re Moses | Counsel for the respondent | 182 Cal. App. 4th 1279 | California Court of Appeal | 16 March 2010 |
| In Re Juarez | Counsel for the respondent | 182 Cal. App. 4th 1316 | California Court of Appeal | 16 March 2010 |
| Scott v. Sisto | Counsel for the respondent | 370 F. App'x 787 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 March 2010 |
| In Re Criscione | Counsel for the appellant | 180 Cal. App. 4th 1446 | California Court of Appeal | 18 December 2009 |
| In re Cerny | Counsel for the respondent | 178 Cal. App. 4th 1303 | California Court of Appeal | 4 November 2009 |
| In Re Criscione | Counsel for the appellant | 173 Cal. App. 4th 60 | California Court of Appeal | 17 April 2009 |
| In Re Lazor | Counsel for the petitioner | 172 Cal. App. 4th 1185 | California Court of Appeal | 7 April 2009 |
| In Re Rozzo | Counsel for the respondent | 172 Cal. App. 4th 40 | California Court of Appeal | 16 March 2009 |
| In Re Chaudhary | Counsel for the appellant | 172 Cal. App. 4th 32 | California Court of Appeal | 13 March 2009 |
| In Re Reed on Habeas Corpus | Counsel for the respondent | 171 Cal. App. 4th 1071 | California Court of Appeal | 5 March 2009 |
| In Re Gaul | Counsel for the respondent | 170 Cal. App. 4th 20 | California Court of Appeal | 13 January 2009 |
| Board of Parole Hearings v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 170 Cal. App. 4th 104 | California Court of Appeal | 19 December 2008 |
| McCright v. Evans | Counsel for the respondent | 299 F. App'x 743 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 November 2008 |
| In re Lawrence | Counsel for the respondent | 44 Cal. 4th 1181 | California Supreme Court | 21 August 2008 |
| In re Shaputis | Counsel for the respondent | 44 Cal. 4th 1241 | California Supreme Court | 21 August 2008 |
| In Re Bush | Counsel for the respondent | 161 Cal. App. 4th 133 | California Court of Appeal | 25 March 2008 |
| In Re Betterncourt | Counsel for the respondent | 156 Cal. App. 4th 780 | California Court of Appeal | 19 October 2007 |
| In Re Roderick | Counsel for the appellant | 154 Cal. App. 4th 242 | California Court of Appeal | 12 September 2007 |
| In Re Jacobson | Counsel for the appellant | 154 Cal. App. 4th 849 | California Court of Appeal | 28 August 2007 |
| In Re Marquez | Counsel for the respondent | 153 Cal. App. 4th 1 | California Court of Appeal | 10 July 2007 |
| In Re Smith | Counsel for the appellant | 150 Cal. App. 4th 451 | California Court of Appeal | 2 May 2007 |
| In Re Weider | Counsel for the appellant | 145 Cal. App. 4th 570 | California Court of Appeal | 5 December 2006 |
| In Re Elkins | Counsel for the respondent | 144 Cal. App. 4th 475 | California Court of Appeal | 31 October 2006 |
| In Re Schmidt | Counsel for the appellant | 143 Cal. App. 4th 694 | California Court of Appeal | 3 October 2006 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is CA Attorney General's Office.
The law school on the record is UC Berkeley School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1997 · 29 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Constitutional Law and Government Law.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Anya M. Binsacca’s license status, bar number #189613, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records