Attorney RecordCivil Rights · Alameda County
Benjamin Nisenbaum · Civil Rights Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Benjamin Nisenbaum is on California’s State Bar roll, #222173, admitted in 2002; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Oakland, Alameda County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Civil Rights. 16 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry & Lacy, LLP. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a civil rights matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #222173 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 2002 |
| Law school | New Coll of CA SOL |
| Firm | Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry & Lacy, LLP |
| Location | Oakland, Alameda County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hung Lam v. City of San Jose | Counsel for the respondent | 869 F.3d 1077 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 September 2017 |
| D.V. v. City of Sunnyvale | Counsel for the defendant | 65 F. Supp. 3d 782 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 August 2014 |
| Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San Francis | Counsel for the appellant | 743 F.3d 1211 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 February 2014 |
| Young Han v. City of Folsom | Counsel for the appellant | 551 F. App'x 923 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 January 2014 |
| M.H. v. County of Alameda | Counsel for the plaintiff | 90 F. Supp. 3d 889 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 18 April 2013 |
| Abston Ex Rel. Estate of Abston v. City of Merced | Counsel for the respondent | 506 F. App'x 650 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 January 2013 |
| Brooks v. County of San Joaquin | Counsel for the plaintiff | 275 F.R.D. 528 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 5 July 2011 |
| Via v. City of Fairfield | Counsel for the plaintiff | 833 F. Supp. 2d 1189 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 13 June 2011 |
| Torry Smith v. City of Oakland | Counsel for the respondent | 379 F. App'x 647 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 May 2010 |
| Patricia Desantis v. City of Santa Rosa | Counsel for the plaintiff | 377 F. App'x 690 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 April 2010 |
| LOHARSINGH v. City and County of San Francisco | Counsel for the plaintiff | 696 F. Supp. 2d 1080 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 11 March 2010 |
| Espinosa v. City and County of San Francisco | Counsel for the respondent | 598 F.3d 528 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 March 2010 |
| Meas v. City and County of San Francisco | Counsel for the plaintiff | 681 F. Supp. 2d 1128 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 9 February 2010 |
| Foster v. City of Oakland | Counsel for the plaintiff | 675 F. Supp. 2d 992 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 December 2009 |
| Foster v. City of Oakland | Counsel for the plaintiff | 621 F. Supp. 2d 779 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 27 March 2008 |
| Smith v. City of Oakland | Counsel for the plaintiff | 538 F. Supp. 2d 1217 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 March 2008 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry & Lacy, LLP.
The law school on the record is New College of CA School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 2002 · 24 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Civil Rights.
16 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Oakland, in Alameda County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, seated at Oakland.
Confirm Benjamin Nisenbaum’s license status, bar number #222173, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Civil Rights in Alameda County: next on the roll
Alameda County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records