Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Brad Dennis Brian · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Brad Dennis Brian is on California’s State Bar roll, #79001, admitted in 1977; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Business Law, Criminal Defense and Litigation. 30 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 16 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 16 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #79001 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1977 |
| Law school | Harvard Univ Law School |
| Firm | Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States Ex Rel. Lee v. Corinthian Colleges | Counsel for the respondent | 652 F. App'x 503 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 June 2016 |
| Doe v. Nestle USA, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 786 F.3d 801 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 May 2015 |
| Doe v. Nestle USA, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 788 F.3d 946 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 May 2015 |
| Bergstein v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP | Counsel for the respondent | 236 Cal. App. 4th 793 | California Court of Appeal | 1 May 2015 |
| John Doe I v. Nestle, USA | Counsel for the defendant | 766 F.3d 1013 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 September 2014 |
| John Doe I v. Nestle, USA | Counsel for the respondent | 738 F.3d 1048 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 December 2013 |
| Advanced Messaging Technologies, Inc. v. Easylink Services International Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 913 F. Supp. 2d 900 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 19 December 2012 |
| United States v. Corinthian Colleges | Counsel for the respondent | 655 F.3d 984 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 August 2011 |
| Aaron Tribble v. Raytheon Company | Counsel for the respondent | 414 F. App'x 98 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 February 2011 |
| Doe v. Nestle, S.A. | Counsel for the defendant | 748 F. Supp. 2d 1057 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 8 September 2010 |
| Franklin Mint Co. v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Counsel for the respondent | 184 Cal. App. 4th 313 | California Court of Appeal | 3 May 2010 |
| PrediWave Corp. v. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | Counsel for the respondent | 179 Cal. App. 4th 1204 | California Court of Appeal | 2 December 2009 |
| Goldman v. KPMG, LLP | Counsel for the appellant | 173 Cal. App. 4th 209 | California Court of Appeal | 22 April 2009 |
| Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office Solution | Counsel for the respondent | 513 F.3d 1038 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 January 2008 |
| Securities & Exchange Commission v. Reyes | Counsel for the defendant | 491 F. Supp. 2d 906 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 May 2007 |
| Hopkins v. Plant Insulation Co. | Counsel for the defendant | 349 B.R. 805 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 27 July 2006 |
| Hindin v. Rust | Counsel for the respondent | 118 Cal. App. 4th 1247 | California Court of Appeal | 24 May 2004 |
| American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton | Counsel for the appellant | 96 Cal. App. 4th 1017 | California Court of Appeal | 8 March 2002 |
| Migliori v. Boeing North American, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 97 F. Supp. 2d 1001 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 17 April 2000 |
| United States v. Sudikoff | Counsel for the defendant | 36 F. Supp. 2d 1196 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 2 March 1999 |
| Arness v. Boeing North American, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 997 F. Supp. 1268 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 26 January 1998 |
| Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Shea-Kiewit-Kenny | Counsel for the appellant | 59 Cal. App. 4th 676 | California Court of Appeal | 26 November 1997 |
| United States Ex Rel., Christopher Hall v. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany Teledyne Industries, Inc., Dba Teledyne Wah Chang Albany and Teledyne, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 104 F.3d 230 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 March 1997 |
| United States of America, Ex Rel., Max Killingsworth v. Northrop Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 25 F.3d 715 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 May 1994 |
| United States of America, Ex Rel., Max Killingsworth v. Northrop Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3669 | California Supreme Court | 23 May 1994 |
| Reddy v. Litton Industries, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 912 F.2d 291 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 August 1990 |
| United States v. Robert James Poole | Counsel for the appellant | 794 F.2d 462 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 December 1986 |
| United States v. Robert James Poole | Counsel for the appellant | 806 F.2d 853 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 December 1986 |
| United States v. Joseph Mark Couch | Counsel for the appellant | 688 F.2d 599 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 September 1982 |
| United States v. Sandor Regner | Counsel for the respondent | 677 F.2d 754 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 May 1982 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers Global 2026, Band 1, Litigation: Trial Lawyers (USA). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 6 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Law Firm Defense (USA - Nationwide). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Star Individuals, Litigation: General Commercial (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Litigation: Trial Lawyers (USA - Nationwide). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at mto.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Harvard University Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1977 · 49 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Business Law, Criminal Defense and Litigation.
30 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Brad Dennis Brian’s license status, bar number #79001, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records