Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Brian Anthony Pierik · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Brian Anthony Pierik is on California’s State Bar roll, #62407, admitted in 1974; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 4 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 12 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #62407 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1974 |
| Law school | Loyola Law School |
| Firm | Burke Williams & Sorenen LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gong v. City of Rosemead | Counsel for the respondent | 226 Cal. App. 4th 363 | California Court of Appeal | 20 May 2014 |
| Lone Star Security & Video, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the defendant | 989 F. Supp. 2d 981 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 December 2013 |
| Lone Star Security & Video, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 520 F. App'x 505 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 March 2013 |
| Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment v. City of Santa Clarita | Counsel for the respondent | 197 Cal. App. 4th 1042 | California Court of Appeal | 30 June 2011 |
| Ricky R. v. City of Alhambra | Counsel for the respondent | 330 F. App'x 639 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 2009 |
| Ricky R. v. City of Alhambra | Counsel for the respondent | 330 F. App'x 639 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 2009 |
| City of Goleta v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 40 Cal. 4th 270 | California Supreme Court | 21 December 2006 |
| City of Santa Clarita v. NTS Technical Systems | Counsel for the respondent | 137 Cal. App. 4th 264 | California Court of Appeal | 3 February 2006 |
| Torrance Redevelopment Agency v. Solvent Coating Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 781 F. Supp. 650 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 28 October 1991 |
| Torrance Redevelopment Agency v. Solvent Coating Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 763 F. Supp. 1060 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 9 May 1991 |
| City of El Monte v. Takei | Counsel for the respondent | 158 Cal. App. 3d 244 | California Court of Appeal | 12 July 1984 |
| Throne v. City of Palos Verdes Estates | Counsel for the appellant | 120 Cal. App. 3d 141 | California Court of Appeal | 18 May 1981 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Burke Williams & Sorenen LLP.
The law school on the record is Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1974 · 52 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Business Law, Construction, Government Law and Real Estate.
12 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Brian Anthony Pierik’s license status, bar number #62407, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records