Attorney RecordSan Bernardino County
Christopher Damian Lockwood · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Christopher Damian Lockwood is on California’s State Bar roll, #110853, admitted in 1983; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Bernrdno, San Bernardino County. 11 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. Certified by the State Bar as a legal specialist in Appellate Law. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #110853 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1983 |
| Law school | Loyola Law School |
| Firm | Arias & Lockwood, APLC |
| Location | San Bernrdno, San Bernardino County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arista v. Cnty. of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 29 Cal. App. 5th 1051 | California Court of Appeal | 20 November 2018 |
| King v. CompPartners, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 5 Cal. 5th 1039 | California Supreme Court | 23 August 2018 |
| Lisa Colmery-Pinkerton v. Joshua Carrasco | Counsel for the respondent | 698 F. App'x 376 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 October 2017 |
| Flethez v. San Bernardino Co. Employees Retirement Assn. | Counsel for the appellant | 2 Cal. 5th 630 | California Supreme Court | 2 March 2017 |
| Nathan Colodney v. Jay Orr | Counsel for the respondent | 651 F. App'x 630 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 June 2016 |
| Nathan Colodney v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 651 F. App'x 609 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 June 2016 |
| Royce Williams v. Nicole Stolar | Counsel for the respondent | 616 F. App'x 253 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 September 2015 |
| Coppinger v. Rawlins | Counsel for the respondent | 239 Cal. App. 4th 608 | California Court of Appeal | 14 August 2015 |
| Green v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 238 Cal. App. 4th 1363 | California Court of Appeal | 29 July 2015 |
| Z v. v. County of Riverside CA4/3 | Counsel for the respondent | 238 Cal. App. 4th 889 | California Court of Appeal | 17 June 2015 |
| Mimiele Goulatte v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 587 F. App'x 374 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 October 2014 |
| Perrin v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the defendant | 555 F. App'x 702 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 February 2014 |
| Walter Brown, Jr. v. Wolfe | Counsel for the respondent | 482 F. App'x 304 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 September 2012 |
| Jesse Brittain v. Sheriff of Riverside County | Counsel for the respondent | 424 F. App'x 708 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 March 2011 |
| Jaime Alvarez v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the defendant | 414 F. App'x 964 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 February 2011 |
| Juan Salazar v. City of Maywood | Counsel for the respondent | 414 F. App'x 73 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 February 2011 |
| Rachel Ziegler v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 403 F. App'x 257 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 November 2010 |
| Ankhenaten Ra El v. Michael Crain | Counsel for the defendant | 399 F. App'x 180 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 October 2010 |
| Scott Miller v. Clark County School District | Counsel for the appellant | 378 F. App'x 623 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 April 2010 |
| Jocer Enterprises, Inc. v. Price | Counsel for the appellant | 183 Cal. App. 4th 559 | California Court of Appeal | 5 April 2010 |
| J.R. Ex Rel. Dickson v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the appellant | 374 F. App'x 755 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 March 2010 |
| Ringel v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 349 F. App'x 224 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 October 2009 |
| Ringel v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 349 F. App'x 224 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 October 2009 |
| Gordon v. City of Moreno Valley | Counsel for the defendant | 687 F. Supp. 2d 930 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 31 August 2009 |
| Sanchez v. County of San Bernardino | Counsel for the respondent | 176 Cal. App. 4th 516 | California Court of Appeal | 7 August 2009 |
| Medina v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 308 F. App'x 118 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 January 2009 |
| Medina v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 308 F. App'x 118 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 January 2009 |
| Harlow v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 295 F. App'x 252 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 October 2008 |
| Smith v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the appellant | 281 F. App'x 699 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 June 2008 |
| Ankhenaten Ra El v. Crain | Counsel for the defendant | 560 F. Supp. 2d 932 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 4 June 2008 |
| Manta Management Corp. v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the appellant | 43 Cal. 4th 400 | California Supreme Court | 24 April 2008 |
| Soto v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the appellant | 162 Cal. App. 4th 492 | California Court of Appeal | 2 April 2008 |
| Centner v. Stout | Counsel for the respondent | 268 F. App'x 590 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 February 2008 |
| Lewis v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 260 F. App'x 8 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 December 2007 |
| Goodwin v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the appellant | 256 F. App'x 172 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 November 2007 |
| Palmer v. Riverside County | Counsel for the respondent | 225 F. App'x 649 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 March 2007 |
| Patel v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the respondent | 207 F. App'x 752 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 November 2006 |
| Baylis v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 197 F. App'x 595 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 August 2006 |
| Jenkins v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 138 Cal. App. 4th 593 | California Court of Appeal | 23 March 2006 |
| Alvarez v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the respondent | 160 F. App'x 608 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 December 2005 |
| Madruga Ex Rel. Madruga v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the defendant | 431 F. Supp. 2d 1049 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 22 November 2005 |
| Bailey v. County of Riverside | Counsel for the appellant | 414 F.3d 1023 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 July 2005 |
| Hamilton v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the defendant | 325 F. Supp. 2d 1087 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 7 July 2004 |
| Redevelopment Agency of San Bernardino v. Alvarez | Counsel for the defendant | 288 F. Supp. 2d 1112 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 21 October 2003 |
| Hamilton v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the defendant | 107 F. Supp. 2d 1239 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 9 August 2000 |
| Armendariz v. Penman | Counsel for the appellant | 75 F.3d 1311 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 February 1996 |
| Armendariz v. Penman | Counsel for the appellant | 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 839 | California Supreme Court | 7 February 1996 |
| Bostrom v. County of San Bernardino | Counsel for the respondent | 35 Cal. App. 4th 1654 | California Court of Appeal | 23 June 1995 |
| Stubblefield Construction Co. v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the appellant | 32 Cal. App. 4th 687 | California Court of Appeal | 27 January 1995 |
| Urethane Foam Experts, Inc. v. Latimer | Counsel for the appellant | 31 Cal. App. 4th 763 | California Court of Appeal | 19 January 1995 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Certified specialties
Appellate Law
Certified by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
On the official record
The State Bar of California has certified this attorney as a legal specialist in Appellate Law · a certification held by roughly one California attorney in sixty, and separate from any rating.
The employer on the official record is Arias & Lockwood, APLC.
A firm or employer website answers at ariaslockwood.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1983 · 43 years on the roll.
11 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Bernrdno, in San Bernardino County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, seated at San Bernardino.
Confirm Christopher Damian Lockwood’s license status, bar number #110853, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in San Bernardino County: next on the roll
San Bernardino County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records