Attorney RecordLos Angeles County

Dan Edward Marmalefsky · California Lawyer

Call(213) 892-5809

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Dan Edward Marmalefsky is on California’s State Bar roll, #95477, admitted in 1980; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Criminal Defense and Litigation. 21 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Morrison & Foerster. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a criminal defense matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#95477
License statusActive
Admitted1980
Law schoolYale Univ
FirmMorrison & Foerster
LocationLos Angeles, Los Angeles County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitemofo.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Townsend v. Monster Beverage Corp.Counsel for the defendant303 F. Supp. 3d 1010U.S. District Court, Central District of California20 March 2018
Alec Fisher v. Monster Beverage CorporationCounsel for the respondent656 F. App'x 819U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 July 2016
United States v. Terry ChristensenCounsel for the appellant828 F.3d 763U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 July 2016
Monster Beverage Corporation v. Dennis HerreraCounsel for the appellant650 F. App'x 344U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 May 2016
United States v. Terry ChristensenCounsel for the appellant801 F.3d 970U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 August 2015
Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.Counsel for the defendant944 F. Supp. 2d 877U.S. District Court, Central District of California13 May 2013
Lee v. Stonebridge Life InsuranceCounsel for the defendant289 F.R.D. 292U.S. District Court, Northern District of California12 February 2013
Euroconcepts, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance CoCounsel for the respondent378 F. App'x 716U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11 May 2010
Omni Home Financing, Inc. v. Hartford Life & Annuity InsuranceCounsel for the respondent367 F. App'x 792U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 February 2010
Omni Home Financing, Inc. v. Hartford Life & Annuity InsuranceCounsel for the respondent367 F. App'x 792U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 February 2010
Vaughn v. LJ International, Inc.Counsel for the respondent174 Cal. App. 4th 213California Court of Appeal26 May 2009
Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc.Counsel for the respondent546 F.3d 661U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 September 2008
Argoquest Holdings, LLC v. Israel Discount Bank, Ltd.Counsel for the appellant228 F. App'x 733U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 April 2007
Yanek v. Staar Surgical Co.Counsel for the defendant388 F. Supp. 2d 1110U.S. District Court, Central District of California19 September 2005
Daily Journal Corp. v. Superior CourtCounsel for the appellant20 Cal. 4th 1117California Supreme Court22 July 1999
Wiener v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCounsel for the appellant951 F.2d 1073U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 December 1991
Thomas Spiegel v. Timothy Ryan Dept. Of Treasury Office of Thrift SupervisionCounsel for the respondent91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8209California Supreme Court11 October 1991
Thomas Spiegel v. Timothy Ryan Dept. Of Treasury Office of Thrift SupervisionCounsel for the respondent946 F.2d 1435U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11 October 1991
Wiener v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCounsel for the appellant943 F.2d 972U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit12 July 1991
Orantes-Hernandez v. MeeseCounsel for the plaintiff685 F. Supp. 1488U.S. District Court, Central District of California29 April 1988
Orantes-Hernandez v. SmithCounsel for the plaintiff541 F. Supp. 351U.S. District Court, Central District of California2 June 1982

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Morrison & Foerster.

A firm or employer website answers at mofo.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.

The law school on the record is Yale Law School.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1980 · 46 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Criminal Defense and Litigation.

21 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Dan Edward Marmalefsky’s license status, bar number #95477, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Criminal Defense in Los Angeles County: next on the roll

Los Angeles County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records