Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Dan Lewis Stormer · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Dan Lewis Stormer is on California’s State Bar roll, #101967, admitted in 1981; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Pasadena, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Civil Rights, Employment and Litigation. This profile lists 2 third-party recognitions published by Chambers and Partners, the most recent in Chambers USA 2026. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a civil rights matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #101967 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1981 |
| Law school | New York Univ SOL |
| Firm | Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai LLP |
| Location | Pasadena, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Mango v. Lilian Myers | Counsel for the respondent | 584 F. App'x 369 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 July 2014 |
| Christian Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 552 F. App'x 723 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 January 2014 |
| Aichele v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the plaintiff | 314 F.R.D. 478 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 26 August 2013 |
| Fazaga v. Federal Bureau of Investigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 884 F. Supp. 2d 1022 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 14 August 2012 |
| Fazaga v. Federal Bureau of Investigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 885 F. Supp. 2d 978 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 14 August 2012 |
| Denise Steffens v. Regus Group, Plc | Counsel for the appellant | 485 F. App'x 187 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 June 2012 |
| Pierce v. County of Orange | Counsel for the plaintiff | 905 F. Supp. 2d 1017 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 2 March 2012 |
| Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Counsel for the appellant | 426 F. App'x 532 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 April 2011 |
| Pierce v. County of Orange | Counsel for the plaintiff | 761 F. Supp. 2d 915 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 7 January 2011 |
| Grobeson v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 190 Cal. App. 4th 778 | California Court of Appeal | 2 December 2010 |
| Philip Kay v. State Bar of California | Counsel for the appellant | 379 F. App'x 631 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 May 2010 |
| Coachella Valley Unified School Dist. v. State of California | Counsel for the appellant | 176 Cal. App. 4th 93 | California Court of Appeal | 30 July 2009 |
| Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 572 F.3d 677 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 2009 |
| Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Counsel for the appellant | 568 F.3d 1028 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 June 2009 |
| Boyd v. City of Hermosa Beach | Counsel for the respondent | 321 F. App'x 584 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 April 2009 |
| Boyd v. City of Hermosa Beach | Counsel for the respondent | 321 F. App'x 584 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 April 2009 |
| Bardzik v. County of Orange | Counsel for the plaintiff | 605 F. Supp. 2d 1076 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 11 March 2009 |
| Cundiff v. Verizon California, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 167 Cal. App. 4th 718 | California Court of Appeal | 16 October 2008 |
| Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Counsel for the appellant | 530 F.3d 865 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 June 2008 |
| Pierce v. County of Orange | Counsel for the appellant | 526 F.3d 1190 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 March 2008 |
| Pierce v. County of Orange | Counsel for the appellant | 519 F.3d 985 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 March 2008 |
| Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Counsel for the appellant | 512 F.3d 1134 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 January 2008 |
| Wysinger v. Automobile Club | Counsel for the appellant | 157 Cal. App. 4th 413 | California Court of Appeal | 29 November 2007 |
| Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Counsel for the appellant | 506 F.3d 713 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 October 2007 |
| Nguon v. Wolf | Counsel for the plaintiff | 517 F. Supp. 2d 1177 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 25 September 2007 |
| Paige v. California | Counsel for the appellant | 233 F. App'x 646 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 May 2007 |
| Fitzgerald v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the plaintiff | 485 F. Supp. 2d 1137 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 April 2007 |
| Salisbury v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 126 F. App'x 368 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 March 2005 |
| Motevalli v. Los Angeles Unified School District | Counsel for the appellant | 122 Cal. App. 4th 97 | California Court of Appeal | 9 September 2004 |
| Bowoto v. Chevron Texaco Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 312 F. Supp. 2d 1229 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 22 March 2004 |
| Doe v. Unocal Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 395 F.3d 932 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 September 2002 |
| Doe v. Unocal Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9585 | California Supreme Court | 18 September 2002 |
| Cundiff v. GTE California Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 101 Cal. App. 4th 1395 | California Court of Appeal | 12 September 2002 |
| York v. County of El Dorado | Counsel for the plaintiff | 119 F. Supp. 2d 1106 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 16 October 2000 |
| Doe I v. Unocal Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 110 F. Supp. 2d 1294 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 31 August 2000 |
| Doe v. Unocal Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 67 F. Supp. 2d 1140 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 5 August 1999 |
| Doe v. Unocal Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 27 F. Supp. 2d 1174 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 18 November 1998 |
| Beyda v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 65 Cal. App. 4th 511 | California Court of Appeal | 9 July 1998 |
| Bureerong v. Uvawas | Counsel for the plaintiff | 959 F. Supp. 1231 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 3 March 1997 |
| Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 14 Cal. 4th 394 | California Supreme Court | 12 December 1996 |
| Bureerong v. Uvawas | Counsel for the plaintiff | 922 F. Supp. 1450 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 21 March 1996 |
| American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Reno | Counsel for the appellant | 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8608 | California Supreme Court | 8 November 1995 |
| American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Reno | Counsel for the appellant | 70 F.3d 1045 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 November 1995 |
| Richard v. City of Pasadena | Counsel for the plaintiff | 889 F. Supp. 384 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 13 April 1995 |
| Ragge v. MCA/Universal Studios | Counsel for the plaintiff | 165 F.R.D. 601 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 March 1995 |
| Ragge v. MCA/Universal Studios | Counsel for the plaintiff | 165 F.R.D. 605 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 March 1995 |
| American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Reno | Counsel for the plaintiff | 883 F. Supp. 1365 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 24 January 1995 |
| Planned Parenthood of Santa Barbara, Ventura & San Luis Obispo, Inc. v. City of Santa Maria | Counsel for the appellant | 16 Cal. App. 4th 685 | California Court of Appeal | 15 June 1993 |
| Benson v. County of Orange | Counsel for the plaintiff | 788 F. Supp. 1123 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 6 April 1992 |
| Kaiser v. County of Sacramento | Counsel for the plaintiff | 780 F. Supp. 1309 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 6 December 1991 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Labor & Employment: Mainly Plaintiffs (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 3, Litigation: Mainly Plaintiffs (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai LLP.
The law school on the record is New York University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1981 · 45 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Civil Rights, Employment and Litigation.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Pasadena, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Dan Lewis Stormer’s license status, bar number #101967, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Civil Rights in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records