Attorney RecordSacramento County
Daniel Joseph O'Hanlon · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Daniel Joseph O'Hanlon is on California’s State Bar roll, #122380, admitted in 1985; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Sacramento, Sacramento County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Environmental Law. 37 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Kronick Moskovitz et al. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #122380 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1985 |
| Law school | UC Hastings COL |
| Firm | Kronick Moskovitz et al |
| Location | Sacramento, Sacramento County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Res. Def. Council v. Zinke | Counsel for the defendant | 347 F. Supp. 3d 465 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 28 September 2018 |
| Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation | Counsel for the defendant | 312 F. Supp. 3d 878 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 7 June 2018 |
| Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation | Counsel for the defendant | 287 F. Supp. 3d 969 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 15 February 2018 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council v. Norton | Counsel for the defendant | 236 F. Supp. 3d 1198 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 23 February 2017 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Haugrud | Counsel for the appellant | 848 F.3d 1216 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 February 2017 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Jewell | Counsel for the plaintiff | 52 F. Supp. 3d 1020 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 1 October 2014 |
| Natural Resources Defense Coun v. Kenneth Salazar | Counsel for the respondent | 749 F.3d 776 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 April 2014 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense Coun | Counsel for the appellant | 747 F.3d 581 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 March 2014 |
| San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the Interior | Counsel for the plaintiff | 984 F. Supp. 2d 1048 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 22 November 2013 |
| Young v. State Water Resources Control Board | Counsel for the appellant | 219 Cal. App. 4th 397 | California Court of Appeal | 4 September 2013 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Jewell | Counsel for the plaintiff | 969 F. Supp. 2d 1211 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 22 August 2013 |
| Firebaugh Canal Water District v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 712 F.3d 1296 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 April 2013 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the Interior | Counsel for the plaintiff | 905 F. Supp. 2d 1158 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 17 October 2012 |
| Natural Resources Defense Coun v. Kenneth Salazar | Counsel for the respondent | 686 F.3d 1092 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 July 2012 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the Interior | Counsel for the plaintiff | 870 F. Supp. 2d 943 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 25 April 2012 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 672 F.3d 676 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 March 2012 |
| Firebaugh Canal Water District v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 819 F. Supp. 2d 1057 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 30 September 2011 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Locke | Counsel for the plaintiff | 791 F. Supp. 2d 802 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 20 September 2011 |
| The Consolidated Delta Smelt Cases | Counsel for the plaintiff | 812 F. Supp. 2d 1133 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 31 August 2011 |
| WATERSHED ENFORCERS v. Department of Water Resources | Counsel for the appellant | 185 Cal. App. 4th 969 | California Court of Appeal | 17 June 2010 |
| Consolidated Salmonid Cases | Counsel for the plaintiff | 713 F. Supp. 2d 1116 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 1 June 2010 |
| Consolidated Delta Smelt Cases | Counsel for the plaintiff | 717 F. Supp. 2d 1021 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 27 May 2010 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Salazar | Counsel for the plaintiff | 693 F. Supp. 2d 1145 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 12 February 2010 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Locke | Counsel for the plaintiff | 688 F. Supp. 2d 1001 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 12 January 2010 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the Interior | Counsel for the plaintiff | 624 F. Supp. 2d 1197 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 14 May 2009 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne | Counsel for the defendant | 621 F. Supp. 2d 954 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 27 April 2009 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of Interior | Counsel for the plaintiff | 637 F. Supp. 2d 777 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 19 September 2008 |
| In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated Proceedings | Counsel for the respondent | 43 Cal. 4th 1143 | California Supreme Court | 5 June 2008 |
| El Dorado Irrigation District v. State Water Resources Control Board | Counsel for the appellant | 142 Cal. App. 4th 937 | California Court of Appeal | 8 September 2006 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the Interior | Counsel for the plaintiff | 236 F.R.D. 491 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 17 May 2006 |
| City of Lodi v. Randtron | Counsel for the appellant | 118 Cal. App. 4th 337 | California Court of Appeal | 5 May 2004 |
| Bay Institute v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 87 F. App'x 637 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 January 2004 |
| Carrancho v. California Air Resources Board | Counsel for the appellant | 111 Cal. App. 4th 1255 | California Court of Appeal | 13 August 2003 |
| Westlands Water District v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 337 F.3d 1092 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2003 |
| Westlands Water District v. United States Department of the Interior | Counsel for the defendant | 275 F. Supp. 2d 1157 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 10 December 2002 |
| Environmental Council of Sacramento v. Slater | Counsel for the defendant | 184 F. Supp. 2d 1016 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 6 November 2000 |
| San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Badgley | Counsel for the plaintiff | 136 F. Supp. 2d 1136 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 28 June 2000 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Kronick Moskovitz et al.
A firm or employer website answers at kmtg.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UC Hastings College of the Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1985 · 41 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Environmental Law.
37 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Sacramento, in Sacramento County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, seated at Sacramento.
Confirm Daniel Joseph O'Hanlon’s license status, bar number #122380, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Sacramento County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records