Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Daniel P. Barer · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Daniel P. Barer is on California’s State Bar roll, #150812, admitted in 1990; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 5 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. Certified by the State Bar as a legal specialist in Appellate Law. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a insurance matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #150812 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1990 |
| Law school | UC Hastings COL |
| Firm | Pollak, Vida and Barer |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa Cook v. Cynthia Harding | Counsel for the respondent | 879 F.3d 1035 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 January 2018 |
| Michael Feiz Medical Corp. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 688 F. App'x 503 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 April 2017 |
| Christ v. Schwartz | Counsel for the respondent | 2 Cal. App. 5th 440 | California Court of Appeal | 12 August 2016 |
| Cook v. Harding | Counsel for the defendant | 190 F. Supp. 3d 921 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 6 June 2016 |
| Grace v. Mansourian CA4/3 | Counsel for the respondent | 240 Cal. App. 4th 523 | California Court of Appeal | 17 August 2015 |
| Allstate Insurance Co. v. Ellery Chacksfield | Counsel for the appellant | 604 F. App'x 588 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 2015 |
| Encompass Insurance Co. v. Coast National Insurance Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 764 F.3d 981 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 August 2014 |
| Henry Mitchell, Jr. v. Jeffrey Gutstadt | Counsel for the respondent | 582 F. App'x 690 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 July 2014 |
| Horath v. Hess | Counsel for the appellant | 225 Cal. App. 4th 456 | California Court of Appeal | 10 April 2014 |
| Walsh v. Tehachapi Unified School District | Counsel for the defendant | 997 F. Supp. 2d 1071 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 4 February 2014 |
| Allstate Insurance Company v. Dino Baglioni | Counsel for the appellant | 551 F. App'x 351 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 January 2014 |
| Sanchez v. Brooke | Counsel for the appellant | 204 Cal. App. 4th 126 | California Court of Appeal | 8 March 2012 |
| Walsh v. Tehachapi Unified School District | Counsel for the defendant | 827 F. Supp. 2d 1107 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 28 October 2011 |
| Thomas Clinton v. Los Angeles Men's Central | Counsel for the respondent | 415 F. App'x 5 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 2011 |
| M.Z. Ex Rel. Yiling Zhang v. Lake Elsinore Unified School District | Counsel for the respondent | 410 F. App'x 53 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 January 2011 |
| Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. Ex Rel. Sprint Telephony PCS, LP v. City of Palos Verdes Estates | Counsel for the appellant | 9 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 12 | California Supreme Court | 14 October 2009 |
| Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. Ex Rel. Sprint Telephony PCS, LP v. City of Palos Verdes Estates | Counsel for the appellant | 583 F.3d 716 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 October 2009 |
| Roberts v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 175 Cal. App. 4th 474 | California Court of Appeal | 29 June 2009 |
| Silverbrand v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 46 Cal. 4th 106 | California Supreme Court | 23 April 2009 |
| Luna v. Vela | Counsel for the respondent | 169 Cal. App. 4th 102 | California Court of Appeal | 15 December 2008 |
| Densmore v. City of Maywood | Counsel for the respondent | 320 F. App'x 497 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 November 2008 |
| Densmore v. City of Maywood | Counsel for the respondent | 320 F. App'x 497 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 November 2008 |
| Olsen v. Reid | Counsel for the appellant | 164 Cal. App. 4th 200 | California Court of Appeal | 23 June 2008 |
| Ovando v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 159 Cal. App. 4th 42 | California Court of Appeal | 18 January 2008 |
| Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. v. City of Palos Verdes Estates | Counsel for the appellant | 508 F.3d 897 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 November 2007 |
| Lockhart v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 155 Cal. App. 4th 289 | California Court of Appeal | 4 October 2007 |
| Paniagua v. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY | Counsel for the appellant | 149 Cal. App. 4th 83 | California Court of Appeal | 29 March 2007 |
| Gillan v. City of San Marino | Counsel for the appellant | 147 Cal. App. 4th 1033 | California Court of Appeal | 21 February 2007 |
| Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. v. City of La Cañada Flintridge | Counsel for the respondent | 182 F. App'x 688 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 May 2006 |
| Authority for California Cities Excess Liability v. City of Los Altos | Counsel for the appellant | 136 Cal. App. 4th 1207 | California Court of Appeal | 22 February 2006 |
| Thiel v. Buchman | Counsel for the respondent | 143 F. App'x 837 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 September 2005 |
| Morgan v. City of Chino | Counsel for the appellant | 115 Cal. App. 4th 1192 | California Court of Appeal | 20 February 2004 |
| Emma Mercado v. Allstate Insurance Company | Counsel for the defendant | 340 F.3d 824 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 August 2003 |
| Degrassi v. Cook | Counsel for the respondent | 29 Cal. 4th 333 | California Supreme Court | 27 November 2002 |
| Truck Insurance Exchange v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 95 Cal. App. 4th 13 | California Court of Appeal | 6 February 2002 |
| Levine v. Weis | Counsel for the appellant | 90 Cal. App. 4th 201 | California Court of Appeal | 25 July 2001 |
| DeGrassi v. City of Glendora | Counsel for the respondent | 207 F.3d 636 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 March 2000 |
| DeGrassi v. City of Glendora | Counsel for the respondent | 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2163 | California Supreme Court | 20 March 2000 |
| Kobzoff v. Los Angeles County Harbor/UCLA Medical Center | Counsel for the respondent | 19 Cal. 4th 851 | California Supreme Court | 28 December 1998 |
| Favorite v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 68 Cal. App. 4th 835 | California Court of Appeal | 21 December 1998 |
| Martin v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 51 Cal. App. 4th 688 | California Court of Appeal | 12 December 1996 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Certified specialties
Appellate Law
Certified by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
On the official record
The State Bar of California has certified this attorney as a legal specialist in Appellate Law · a certification held by roughly one California attorney in sixty, and separate from any rating.
The employer on the official record is Pollak, Vida and Barer.
A firm or employer website answers at pollakvida.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UC Hastings College of the Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1990 · 36 years on the roll.
5 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
41 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Daniel P. Barer’s license status, bar number #150812, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Insurance in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records