Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Daniel S. Schecter · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Daniel S. Schecter is on California’s State Bar roll, #171472, admitted in 1994; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Business Law, Intellectual Property and Litigation. 15 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 22 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 22 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #171472 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1994 |
| Law school | USC Law School |
| Firm | Latham & Watkins LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Languages
These are signals observed from the firm's public website, not a statement by the attorney. Confirm language access directly with the office before retaining counsel. Language listings describe access, not ability or results. Browse attorneys by language →
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carolyn A. Dye v. Communications Ventures III | Counsel for the respondent | 647 F. App'x 689 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 March 2016 |
| Kelly Van v. James Cameron | Counsel for the respondent | 566 F. App'x 615 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 April 2014 |
| Grant v. National Football League Players Ass'n | Counsel for the respondent | 566 F. App'x 569 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 March 2014 |
| Corra v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 962 F. Supp. 2d 1207 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 2 August 2013 |
| Mendoza v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 352 F. App'x 224 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 November 2009 |
| Mendoza v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 352 F. App'x 224 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 November 2009 |
| FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Parrish | Counsel for the appellant | 174 Cal. App. 4th 1270 | California Court of Appeal | 15 June 2009 |
| Adachi v. Carlyle/Galaxy San Pedro L.P. | Counsel for the defendant | 595 F. Supp. 2d 1147 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 30 January 2009 |
| Zella v. E.W. Scripps Co. | Counsel for the defendant | 529 F. Supp. 2d 1124 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 18 December 2007 |
| New. Net, Inc. v. Lavasoft | Counsel for the plaintiff | 356 F. Supp. 2d 1090 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 May 2004 |
| Ellison v. Robertson | Counsel for the respondent | 357 F.3d 1072 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 February 2004 |
| New.net, Inc. v. Lavasoft | Counsel for the plaintiff | 356 F. Supp. 2d 1071 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 6 November 2003 |
| Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Nissan Computer Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 231 F. Supp. 2d 977 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 13 November 2002 |
| Ellison v. Robertson | Counsel for the defendant | 189 F. Supp. 2d 1051 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 13 March 2002 |
| Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 204 F.R.D. 460 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 5 December 2001 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
Language information is listed below with its attorney, staff or website source.
The employer on the official record is Latham & Watkins LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at lw.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is USC Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1994 · 32 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Business Law, Intellectual Property and Litigation.
15 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Daniel S. Schecter’s license status, bar number #171472, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records