Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
David J. Schindler · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
David J. Schindler is on California’s State Bar roll, #130490, admitted in 1987; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 6 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 19 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 14 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 14 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #130490 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1987 |
| Law school | Univ of California at Los Angeles |
| Firm | Latham & Watkins LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Languages
These are signals observed from the firm's public website, not a statement by the attorney. Confirm language access directly with the office before retaining counsel. Language listings describe access, not ability or results. Browse attorneys by language →
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ex rel. Silingo v. Wellpoint, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 904 F.3d 667 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 July 2018 |
| City of Almaty v. Elvira Khrapunov | Counsel for the appellant | 685 F. App'x 634 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 March 2017 |
| United States v. United Healthcare Insurance Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 848 F.3d 1161 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 August 2016 |
| United States v. United Healthcare Insurance Co | Counsel for the respondent | 832 F.3d 1084 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 August 2016 |
| People Ex Rel. Harris v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 247 Cal. App. 4th 884 | California Court of Appeal | 25 May 2016 |
| United States ex rel. Cericola v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc | Counsel for the defendant | 529 F. Supp. 2d 1139 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 28 December 2007 |
| Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Nissan Computer Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 231 F. Supp. 2d 977 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 13 November 2002 |
| Wesley Jessen Corp. v. COOPERVISION, INC. | Counsel for the defendant | 233 F. Supp. 2d 1233 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 August 2002 |
| Wesley Jessen Corp. v. Coopervision, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 207 F. Supp. 2d 1103 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 17 June 2002 |
| Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Nissan Computer Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 180 F. Supp. 2d 1089 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 14 January 2002 |
| Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 204 F.R.D. 460 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 5 December 2001 |
| Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Nissan Computer Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 89 F. Supp. 2d 1154 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 23 March 2000 |
| United States v. Justin Tanner Petersen | Counsel for the respondent | 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7770 | California Supreme Court | 22 October 1996 |
| United States v. Justin Tanner Petersen | Counsel for the respondent | 98 F.3d 502 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 October 1996 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael GARTNER, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6237 | California Supreme Court | 21 August 1996 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael GARTNER, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 93 F.3d 633 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 August 1996 |
| United States v. Sarno | Counsel for the respondent | 73 F.3d 1470 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 December 1995 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 67 F.3d 823 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 October 1995 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7734 | California Supreme Court | 3 October 1995 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
Language information is listed below with its attorney, staff or website source.
The employer on the official record is Latham & Watkins LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at lw.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UCLA School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1987 · 39 years on the roll.
6 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
19 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm David J. Schindler’s license status, bar number #130490, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records