Attorney RecordBusiness Law · San Francisco County
David Taro Biderman · Business Law Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
David Taro Biderman is on California’s State Bar roll, #101577, admitted in 1981; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Business Law. 20 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Perkins Coie LLP. Registry record updated 25 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 25 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #101577 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1981 |
| Law school | Univ of Virginia |
| Firm | Perkins Coie LLP |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing Business Law in San Francisco County
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hilsley v. Gen. Mills, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 376 F. Supp. 3d 1043 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 26 March 2019 |
| Barefield v. HSBC Holdings PLC | Counsel for the defendant | 356 F. Supp. 3d 977 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 7 December 2018 |
| Post Foods, LLC v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty. | Counsel for the petitioner | 25 Cal. App. 5th 278 | California Court of Appeal | 16 July 2018 |
| Foster Taft v. Nabisco | Counsel for the respondent | 675 F. App'x 796 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 January 2017 |
| Estrada v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 172 F. Supp. 3d 1108 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 25 March 2016 |
| Backus v. General Mills, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 122 F. Supp. 3d 909 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 18 August 2015 |
| La Cuna De Aztlan Sacred Sites Protection Circle Advisory Committee v. United States Department of Interior | Counsel for the defendant | 603 F. App'x 651 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 May 2015 |
| Western Watersheds Project v. Sally Jewell | Counsel for the respondent | 601 F. App'x 586 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 May 2015 |
| Dennis Hellervik v. 3m Company | Counsel for the respondent | 578 F. App'x 730 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 June 2014 |
| Public Employees' Retirement System v. Moody's Investors Service, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 226 Cal. App. 4th 643 | California Court of Appeal | 27 May 2014 |
| Ronald Grassi v. Moody's Investors Services | Counsel for the respondent | 540 F. App'x 737 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 October 2013 |
| Janney v. Mills | Counsel for the defendant | 944 F. Supp. 2d 806 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 May 2013 |
| Lam v. General Mills, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 859 F. Supp. 2d 1097 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 May 2012 |
| Clrb Hanson Industries, LLC v. Weiss & Associates, Pc | Counsel for the respondent | 465 F. App'x 617 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 January 2012 |
| Anschutz Corp. v. MERRILL LYNCH AND CO. INC. | Counsel for the defendant | 785 F. Supp. 2d 799 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 27 March 2011 |
| In Re Wells Fargo Mortgage-Backed Certificates Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 712 F. Supp. 2d 958 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 22 April 2010 |
| Public Employees' Retirement System v. Stanley | Counsel for the defendant | 605 F. Supp. 2d 1073 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 6 March 2009 |
| Aviation Upgrade Technologies, Inc. v. Boeing Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 78 F. App'x 623 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 October 2003 |
| Orion Tire Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 268 F.3d 1133 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 October 2001 |
| San Francisco Unified School District v. W.R. Grace & Company-Connecticut | Counsel for the respondent | 37 Cal. App. 4th 1318 | California Court of Appeal | 21 August 1995 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Perkins Coie LLP.
The law school on the record is University of Virginia.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1981 · 45 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Business Law.
20 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm David Taro Biderman’s license status, bar number #101577, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in San Francisco County: next on the roll
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records