Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Davina T. Chen · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Davina T. Chen is on California’s State Bar roll, #202272, admitted in 1999; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #202272 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1999 |
| Law school | New York Univ SOL |
| Firm | Law Office of Davina T. Chen |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Reginald Edwards | Counsel for the appellant | 761 F.3d 977 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2014 |
| United States v. Nzelo Okafor | Counsel for the appellant | 550 F. App'x 414 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 December 2013 |
| United States v. Orlando Clement | Counsel for the appellant | 723 F.3d 1028 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 July 2013 |
| United States v. Sutton | Counsel for the appellant | 530 F. App'x 668 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 June 2013 |
| United States v. Gerald Williams | Counsel for the appellant | 520 F. App'x 617 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 June 2013 |
| United States v. Rodriguez | Counsel for the defendant | 924 F. Supp. 2d 1108 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 11 January 2013 |
| United States v. Terry Franklin | Counsel for the appellant | 501 F. App'x 629 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 December 2012 |
| United States v. Eileen Montoya | Counsel for the appellant | 501 F. App'x 615 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 December 2012 |
| United States v. Napoleon Bustamante | Counsel for the appellant | 687 F.3d 1190 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 August 2012 |
| United States v. Casasola | Counsel for the appellant | 670 F.3d 1023 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 January 2012 |
| United States v. Rafael De La Torre | Counsel for the appellant | 447 F. App'x 851 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 August 2011 |
| United States v. Gevork Kartashyan | Counsel for the appellant | 428 F. App'x 685 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 April 2011 |
| United States v. Doss | Counsel for the appellant | 630 F.3d 1181 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 January 2011 |
| United States v. Thomas Cochee | Counsel for the appellant | 401 F. App'x 285 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 October 2010 |
| United States v. Joseph Langer | Counsel for the appellant | 618 F.3d 1044 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 August 2010 |
| United States v. Fernando Velasquez-bosque | Counsel for the plaintiff | 375 F. App'x 787 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 April 2010 |
| United States v. Jaime Ruiz | Counsel for the appellant | 373 F. App'x 689 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 April 2010 |
| United States v. David Burleson | Counsel for the appellant | 372 F. App'x 763 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 March 2010 |
| United States v. Castanon-Espitia | Counsel for the appellant | 369 F. App'x 809 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 March 2010 |
| United States v. Castanon-Espitia | Counsel for the appellant | 369 F. App'x 809 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 March 2010 |
| United States v. Marc Rideout | Counsel for the appellant | 356 F. App'x 963 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2009 |
| United States v. Rubio | Counsel for the appellant | 333 F. App'x 283 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2009 |
| United States v. Rubio | Counsel for the appellant | 333 F. App'x 283 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2009 |
| United States v. Smith | Counsel for the appellant | 569 F.3d 1142 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 June 2009 |
| United States v. Flores-Lopez | Counsel for the appellant | 325 F. App'x 617 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 May 2009 |
| United States v. Flores-Lopez | Counsel for the appellant | 325 F. App'x 617 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 May 2009 |
| United States v. Smith | Counsel for the appellant | 561 F.3d 934 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 April 2009 |
| United States v. Juarez | Counsel for the appellant | 314 F. App'x 35 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 October 2008 |
| United States v. Juarez | Counsel for the appellant | 314 F. App'x 35 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 October 2008 |
| United States v. Smith | Counsel for the appellant | 545 F.3d 1105 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2008 |
| United States v. Hilliard | Counsel for the appellant | 289 F. App'x 239 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 August 2008 |
| United States v. Locklin | Counsel for the appellant | 530 F.3d 908 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 June 2008 |
| Butler v. Curry | Counsel for the petitioner | 528 F.3d 624 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 June 2008 |
| United States v. Cervantes-Rubio | Counsel for the appellant | 275 F. App'x 601 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 April 2008 |
| United States v. Johnson | Counsel for the appellant | 273 F. App'x 604 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 April 2008 |
| United States v. Smith | Counsel for the appellant | 273 F. App'x 594 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 March 2008 |
| United States v. Smith | Counsel for the appellant | 520 F.3d 1097 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 March 2008 |
| United States v. Barsumyan | Counsel for the appellant | 517 F.3d 1154 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 February 2008 |
| Madriaga v. Kane | Counsel for the respondent | 263 F. App'x 563 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 January 2008 |
| United States v. Tyger | Counsel for the appellant | 240 F. App'x 229 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 September 2007 |
| Walker v. Yarborough | Counsel for the appellant | 242 F. App'x 392 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 May 2007 |
| United States v. Martinie | Counsel for the appellant | 220 F. App'x 690 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 February 2007 |
| United States v. Albert Lamont Hector, United States of America v. Albert Lamont Hector | Counsel for the respondent | 474 F.3d 1150 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 January 2007 |
| United States v. Goodwin | Counsel for the appellant | 219 F. App'x 709 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 January 2007 |
| United States v. Smith | Counsel for the appellant | 219 F. App'x 666 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 January 2007 |
| United States v. Mario Joseph Baldrich | Counsel for the appellant | 471 F.3d 1110 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 December 2006 |
| United States v. Ruiz-Jaime | Counsel for the appellant | 215 F. App'x 675 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 December 2006 |
| United States v. Biala | Counsel for the respondent | 214 F. App'x 694 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 December 2006 |
| United States v. Ika Wah Lam | Counsel for the appellant | 212 F. App'x 640 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 December 2006 |
| United States v. Garcia-Mendez | Counsel for the appellant | 212 F. App'x 682 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 December 2006 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Law Office of Davina T. Chen.
A firm or employer website answers at davinachen.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is New York University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1999 · 27 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Davina T. Chen’s license status, bar number #202272, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records