Attorney RecordFamily Law · San Francisco County

Dennis Michael Nerney · Family Law Attorney

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Dennis Michael Nerney is on California’s State Bar roll, #40989, admitted in 1967; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Family Law. 28 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a family law matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#40989
License statusActive
Admitted1967
Law schoolUC Hastings COL
LocationSan Francisco, San Francisco County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
United States v. JudaCounsel for the respondent207 F. App'x 757U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit14 November 2006
United States v. Beau Lee Lewis, United States of America v. Beau Lee LewisCounsel for the respondent349 F.3d 1116U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 November 2003
United States v. Beau Lee Lewis, United States of America v. Beau Lee LewisCounsel for the respondent2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9802California Supreme Court13 November 2003
United States v. Olaf Peter Juda Raymond Edward Missell Anthony Burg Frans Gustaaf Van Der Hoeven and Christopher Dean ParisCounsel for the respondent46 F.3d 961U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 February 1995
United States v. Olaf Peter Juda Raymond Edward Missell Anthony Burg Frans Gustaaf Van Der Hoeven and Christopher Dean ParisCounsel for the respondent95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 846California Supreme Court2 February 1995
United States v. JudaCounsel for the plaintiff797 F. Supp. 774U.S. District Court, Northern District of California11 June 1992
United States v. Loranza Verne PowellCounsel for the respondent932 F.2d 1337U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 May 1991
United States v. Loranza Verne PowellCounsel for the respondent91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3469California Supreme Court13 May 1991
United States v. Alan James DringCounsel for the respondent930 F.2d 687U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 April 1991
United States v. Alan James DringCounsel for the respondent91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2449California Supreme Court4 April 1991
United States v. $5,644,540.00 in U.S. CurrencyCounsel for the respondent799 F.2d 1357U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 September 1986
United States v. William Stanley Stewart, AKA Stanislaus William WhiteCounsel for the respondent799 F.2d 580U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit12 September 1986
United States v. Michael Gibson NorthCounsel for the respondent746 F.2d 627U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 November 1984
Chua Han Mow v. United StatesCounsel for the respondent730 F.2d 1308U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit12 April 1984
United States v. One 56-Foot Motor Yacht Named the Tahuna, and New Approach, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCounsel for the respondent702 F.2d 1276U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 June 1983
John Steven Bryan v. United StatesCounsel for the respondent645 F.2d 842U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 May 1981
United States v. Frank D. StanleyCounsel for the respondent601 F.2d 380U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 February 1979
United States v. Cleophas James Kearney, United States of America v. Eugene Lemon, Jr.Counsel for the respondent560 F.2d 1358U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 August 1977
United States v. Andre Willis King, United States of America v. Fred Neil PowellCounsel for the respondent552 F.2d 833U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 April 1977
United States v. James HuntCounsel for the respondent548 F.2d 268U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 February 1977
United States v. StanleyCounsel for the appellant545 F.2d 661U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 November 1976
United States of America, and v. One 1974 Jeep, Serial Number J4f835te17237, California License Number 903 Kdm, Its Tools and Appurtenances, AndCounsel for the respondent536 F.2d 1285U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit15 June 1976
United States v. One 1973 Lincoln ContinentalCounsel for the plaintiff391 F. Supp. 1197U.S. District Court, Northern District of California28 March 1975
United States v. One 1967 Porsche, Model 911-Targa Serial Number 500-677, Motor Number 912-018Counsel for the respondent492 F.2d 893U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 February 1974
United States v. Eneliko Fatu FaleafineCounsel for the respondent492 F.2d 18U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 January 1974
United States v. Marion Bruce PhelpsCounsel for the respondent490 F.2d 644U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11 January 1974
United States v. Keith Edward Allende, United States of America v. Serito Trujillo Montoya, United States of America v. Donna Rae SilsbeeCounsel for the respondent486 F.2d 1351U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 November 1973
United States v. David Lawrence FaulkenberyCounsel for the respondent472 F.2d 879U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit7 May 1973

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The law school on the record is UC Hastings College of the Law.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1967 · 59 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Family Law.

28 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Dennis Michael Nerney’s license status, bar number #40989, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Family Law in San Francisco County: next on the roll

San Francisco County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records