Attorney RecordPersonal Injury · San Francisco County

Don Willenburg · Personal Injury Attorney

Call(415) 875-4302

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Don Willenburg is on California’s State Bar roll, #116377, admitted in 1984; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law and Personal Injury. 27 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a personal injury matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#116377
License statusActive
Admitted1984
Law schoolStanford Univ Law School
FirmGordon & Rees LLP
LocationSan Francisco, San Francisco County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitegrsm.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Burch v. Certainteed Corp.Counsel for the appellant34 Cal. App. 5th 341California Court of Appeal15 April 2019
Lions Club of Albany v. City of AlbanyCounsel for the plaintiff323 F. Supp. 3d 1104U.S. District Court, Northern District of California15 June 2018
Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc.Counsel for the respondent9 Cal. App. 5th 234California Court of Appeal2 February 2017
Castro-Ramirez v. Dependable Highway Express, Inc.Counsel for the respondent2 Cal. App. 5th 1028California Court of Appeal29 August 2016
John H. Boyd, III v. Warren Pumps, LLCCounsel for the respondent654 F. App'x 875U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 June 2016
Rondon v. Hennessy Industries CA1/4Counsel for the respondent247 Cal. App. 4th 1367California Court of Appeal9 May 2016
Hetzel v. Hennessy Industries CA1/1Counsel for the respondent247 Cal. App. 4th 521California Court of Appeal28 April 2016
Castro-Ramirez v. Dependable Highway Express, Inc.Counsel for the respondent246 Cal. App. 4th 180California Court of Appeal4 April 2016
Sherman v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.Counsel for the respondent237 Cal. App. 4th 1133California Court of Appeal18 June 2015
Barry Lamon v. Hans BirkholmCounsel for the respondent591 F. App'x 615U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 January 2015
Fiorini v. City Brewing CompanyCounsel for the respondent231 Cal. App. 4th 306California Court of Appeal6 November 2014
Li Ching Chu v. Tribal Technologies, Inc.Counsel for the respondent576 F. App'x 668U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit29 May 2014
John Dariano v. Morgan Hill Unified School DisCounsel for the respondent745 F.3d 354U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 February 2014
Dariano v. Morgan Hill Unified School DistrictCounsel for the respondent767 F.3d 764U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 February 2014
Robert v. Stanford UniversityCounsel for the respondent224 Cal. App. 4th 67California Court of Appeal25 February 2014
Brisbane Lodging, L.P. v. Webcor Builders, Inc.Counsel for the respondent216 Cal. App. 4th 1249California Court of Appeal3 June 2013
Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P.Counsel for the respondent55 Cal. 4th 1148California Supreme Court31 December 2012
Sino Century Development Ltd. v. FarleyCounsel for the respondent211 Cal. App. 4th 688California Court of Appeal3 December 2012
Timothy Nelson v. City of DavisCounsel for the appellant685 F.3d 867U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11 July 2012
Jackson v. Wilson, Jackson, Goodrich & SonsiniCounsel for the respondent474 F. App'x 511U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 June 2012
Bailey v. Safeway, Inc.Counsel for the respondent199 Cal. App. 4th 206California Court of Appeal15 September 2011
Dye v. Caterpillar, Inc.Counsel for the respondent195 Cal. App. 4th 1366California Court of Appeal27 May 2011
Simonelli v. University of CaliforniaCounsel for the respondent338 F. App'x 673U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 July 2009
Simonelli v. University of CaliforniaCounsel for the respondent338 F. App'x 673U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 July 2009
Nelson v. City of DavisCounsel for the respondent571 F.3d 924U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit7 July 2009
Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Superior CourtCounsel for the petitioner139 Cal. App. 4th 1481California Court of Appeal26 May 2006
Izumi v. Continental Casualty Co.Counsel for the respondent122 F. App'x 390U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 March 2005

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Gordon & Rees LLP.

A firm or employer website answers at grsm.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.

The law school on the record is Stanford University Law School.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1984 · 42 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law and Personal Injury.

27 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Don Willenburg’s license status, bar number #116377, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Personal Injury in San Francisco County: next on the roll

San Francisco County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records