Attorney RecordBusiness Law · Los Angeles County
Edmund Gerard Farrell, III · Business Law Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Edmund Gerard Farrell, III is on California’s State Bar roll, #111042, admitted in 1983; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 4 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 28 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #111042 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1983 |
| Law school | Santa Clara Univ |
| Firm | Murchison & Cumming |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Languages
These are signals observed from the firm's public website, not a statement by the attorney. Confirm language access directly with the office before retaining counsel. Language listings describe access, not ability or results. Browse attorneys by language →
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monster Energy Company v. Schechter | Counsel for the respondent | 7 Cal. 5th 781 | California Supreme Court | 11 July 2019 |
| Jayone Foods, Inc. v. Aekyung Indus. Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 31 Cal. App. 5th 543 | California Court of Appeal | 22 January 2019 |
| Kinda v. Carpenter | Counsel for the respondent | 247 Cal. App. 4th 1268 | California Court of Appeal | 6 June 2016 |
| EZ Mailing Services, Inc. v. Oracle Transportation Solutions, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 647 F. App'x 674 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 April 2016 |
| Valley Crest Landscape Development, Inc. v. Mission Pools of Escondido, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 238 Cal. App. 4th 468 | California Court of Appeal | 26 June 2015 |
| Cindy Hung v. Tribal Technologies | Counsel for the respondent | 577 F. App'x 650 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 May 2014 |
| Rayii v. Gatica CA2/3 | Counsel for the respondent | 218 Cal. App. 4th 1402 | California Court of Appeal | 24 July 2013 |
| Greb v. Diamond International Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 56 Cal. 4th 243 | California Supreme Court | 21 February 2013 |
| Henry v. Red Hill Evangelical Lutheran Church of Tustin | Counsel for the respondent | 201 Cal. App. 4th 1041 | California Court of Appeal | 9 December 2011 |
| Del Webb Communities, Inc. v. Partington | Counsel for the appellant | 652 F.3d 1145 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 July 2011 |
| Stern v. Does | Counsel for the defendant | 978 F. Supp. 2d 1031 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 10 February 2011 |
| Mehmet Yalter v. Endocare, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 412 F. App'x 24 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 January 2011 |
| Luna v. Kemira Specialty, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 575 F. Supp. 2d 1166 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 11 September 2008 |
| Stewart v. Aloia | Counsel for the respondent | 231 F. App'x 724 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 May 2007 |
| Kagy v. Sterling Hills Golf Course | Counsel for the respondent | 211 F. App'x 563 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 November 2006 |
| Morris v. AGFA CORP. | Counsel for the respondent | 144 Cal. App. 4th 1452 | California Court of Appeal | 21 November 2006 |
| SYNGENTA CORP PROTECTION, INC. v. Helliker | Counsel for the appellant | 138 Cal. App. 4th 1135 | California Court of Appeal | 25 April 2006 |
| Century Surety Co. v. Crosby Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 124 Cal. App. 4th 116 | California Court of Appeal | 17 November 2004 |
| Hicks v. Kaufman & Broad Home Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 89 Cal. App. 4th 908 | California Court of Appeal | 3 July 2001 |
| National Environment Waste Corp. v. Stephens, Berg & Lasaster | Counsel for the respondent | 200 F.3d 1266 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 January 2000 |
| Mez Industries, Inc. v. Pacific National Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 76 Cal. App. 4th 856 | California Court of Appeal | 21 December 1999 |
| Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Reiswig | Counsel for the appellant | 21 Cal. 4th 208 | California Supreme Court | 5 August 1999 |
| Van Dyke v. S.K.I. Ltd. | Counsel for the respondent | 67 Cal. App. 4th 1310 | California Court of Appeal | 23 November 1998 |
| A-H Plating, Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 57 Cal. App. 4th 427 | California Court of Appeal | 28 August 1997 |
| O'DELL v. Freightliner Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 10 Cal. App. 4th 645 | California Court of Appeal | 22 October 1992 |
| Mitchell v. Scott Wetzel Services, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 227 Cal. App. 3d 1474 | California Court of Appeal | 26 February 1991 |
| Krain v. Smallwood | Counsel for the respondent | 880 F.2d 1119 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 July 1989 |
| Danner v. Himmelfarb | Counsel for the defendant | 858 F.2d 515 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 September 1988 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
Language information is listed below with its attorney, staff or website source.
The employer on the official record is Murchison & Cumming.
The law school on the record is Santa Clara University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1983 · 43 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law, Business Law, Legal Malpractice and Professional Liability.
28 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Edmund Gerard Farrell, III’s license status, bar number #111042, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records