Attorney RecordAlameda County
Fiel D. Tigno · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Fiel D. Tigno is on California’s State Bar roll, #161195, admitted in 1992; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Oakland, Alameda County. 6 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 41 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Ofc Attorney General. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a employment matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #161195 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1992 |
| Law school | Univ of California Berkeley |
| Firm | Ofc Attorney General |
| Location | Oakland, Alameda County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| People v. Alvarez | Counsel for the respondent | 32 Cal. App. 5th 1267 | California Court of Appeal | 12 March 2019 |
| Manavian v. Dep't of Justice | Counsel for the respondent | 28 Cal. App. 5th 1127 | California Court of Appeal | 7 November 2018 |
| Munro v. Dep't of Motor Vehicles | Counsel for the respondent | 21 Cal. App. 5th 41 | California Court of Appeal | 7 March 2018 |
| Stirling v. Brown | Counsel for the respondent | 18 Cal. App. 5th 1144 | California Court of Appeal | 4 January 2018 |
| McLean v. State of California | Counsel for the respondent | 1 Cal. 5th 615 | California Supreme Court | 18 August 2016 |
| Guerrero v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation | Counsel for the defendant | 119 F. Supp. 3d 1065 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 21 July 2015 |
| Piccinini v. California Emergency Management Agency | Counsel for the respondent | 226 Cal. App. 4th 685 | California Court of Appeal | 27 May 2014 |
| California Grocers Ass'n v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control | Counsel for the respondent | 219 Cal. App. 4th 1065 | California Court of Appeal | 19 September 2013 |
| Shawna Hartmann v. California Department of Corr. | Counsel for the respondent | 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1885 | California Supreme Court | 19 February 2013 |
| Shawna Hartmann v. California Department of Corr. | Counsel for the respondent | 707 F.3d 1114 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 February 2013 |
| Hoberman-Kelly v. Valverde | Counsel for the appellant | 213 Cal. App. 4th 626 | California Court of Appeal | 5 February 2013 |
| Bjorndal v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 211 Cal. App. 4th 1100 | California Court of Appeal | 12 December 2012 |
| Matteo v. Department of Motor Vehicles | Counsel for the appellant | 209 Cal. App. 4th 624 | California Court of Appeal | 21 September 2012 |
| Allende v. Department of the California Highway Patrol | Counsel for the appellant | 201 Cal. App. 4th 1006 | California Court of Appeal | 9 December 2011 |
| McCollum v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation | Counsel for the respondent | 647 F.3d 870 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 June 2011 |
| Van Pena v. Timothy Meeker | Counsel for the respondent | 435 F. App'x 602 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 May 2011 |
| Brown v. Valverde | Counsel for the appellant | 183 Cal. App. 4th 1531 | California Court of Appeal | 23 April 2010 |
| Rouser v. White | Counsel for the defendant | 707 F. Supp. 2d 1055 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 15 April 2010 |
| Miyamoto v. Department of Motor Vehicles | Counsel for the appellant | 176 Cal. App. 4th 1210 | California Court of Appeal | 20 August 2009 |
| Rouser v. White | Counsel for the defendant | 630 F. Supp. 2d 1165 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 15 May 2009 |
| Molenda v. Department of Motor Vehicles | Counsel for the appellant | 172 Cal. App. 4th 974 | California Court of Appeal | 27 March 2009 |
| State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Superior Court of Sacramento County | Counsel for the petitioner | 45 Cal. 4th 963 | California Supreme Court | 26 February 2009 |
| McCollum v. California | Counsel for the defendant | 610 F. Supp. 2d 1053 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 23 February 2009 |
| Pena v. Meeker | Counsel for the defendant | 298 F. App'x 562 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 October 2008 |
| Department of California Highway Patrol v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 158 Cal. App. 4th 726 | California Court of Appeal | 4 January 2008 |
| Isaac v. Department of Motor Vehicles | Counsel for the appellant | 155 Cal. App. 4th 851 | California Court of Appeal | 26 September 2007 |
| Rondon v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board | Counsel for the respondent | 151 Cal. App. 4th 1274 | California Court of Appeal | 11 June 2007 |
| Troppman v. Valverde | Counsel for the appellant | 40 Cal. 4th 1121 | California Supreme Court | 26 April 2007 |
| Diablo Valley College Faculty Senate v. Contra Costa Community College District | Counsel for the respondent | 148 Cal. App. 4th 1023 | California Court of Appeal | 21 March 2007 |
| McRae v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation | Counsel for the appellant | 142 Cal. App. 4th 377 | California Court of Appeal | 29 August 2006 |
| Pena v. Bjorndal | Counsel for the respondent | 177 F. App'x 666 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 April 2006 |
| California Highway Patrol v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 135 Cal. App. 4th 488 | California Court of Appeal | 4 January 2006 |
| In Re Work Uniform Cases | Counsel for the respondent | 133 Cal. App. 4th 328 | California Court of Appeal | 11 October 2005 |
| Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly | Counsel for the respondent | 129 Cal. App. 4th 988 | California Court of Appeal | 20 June 2005 |
| BOBUS v. Department of Motor Vehicles | Counsel for the appellant | 125 Cal. App. 4th 680 | California Court of Appeal | 6 January 2005 |
| Bronco Wine Company v. Jolly | Counsel for the respondent | 33 Cal. 4th 943 | California Supreme Court | 13 October 2004 |
| Moles v. Gourley | Counsel for the appellant | 112 Cal. App. 4th 1049 | California Court of Appeal | 23 October 2003 |
| Hastings v. Department of Corrections | Counsel for the respondent | 110 Cal. App. 4th 963 | California Court of Appeal | 22 July 2003 |
| Jackson v. Gourley | Counsel for the appellant | 105 Cal. App. 4th 966 | California Court of Appeal | 28 January 2003 |
| Kerollis v. Department of Motor Vehicles | Counsel for the appellant | 75 Cal. App. 4th 1299 | California Court of Appeal | 29 October 1999 |
| Valiyee v. Department of Motor Vehicles | Counsel for the respondent | 74 Cal. App. 4th 1026 | California Court of Appeal | 2 September 1999 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Ofc Attorney General.
The law school on the record is UC Berkeley School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1992 · 34 years on the roll.
6 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
41 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Oakland, in Alameda County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, seated at Oakland.
Confirm Fiel D. Tigno’s license status, bar number #161195, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Employment in Alameda County: next on the roll
Alameda County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records