Attorney RecordCivil Rights · Los Angeles County
Frank Alan Weiser · Civil Rights Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Frank Alan Weiser is on California’s State Bar roll, #89780, admitted in 1979; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Civil Rights. 27 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a civil rights matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #89780 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1979 |
| Law school | Southwestern Univ SOL |
| Firm | Law Offices of Frank A. Weiser |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mahesh Patel v. City of Montclair | Counsel for the appellant | 798 F.3d 895 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 August 2015 |
| Jayantibhai Patel v. City of Long Beach | Counsel for the appellant | 564 F. App'x 881 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 March 2014 |
| Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 686 F.3d 1085 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 July 2012 |
| Khapabhai Patel v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 455 F. App'x 743 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 October 2011 |
| Jayendra Shah v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 399 F. App'x 305 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 October 2010 |
| Sinclair v. City of Needles | Counsel for the appellant | 365 F. App'x 844 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 February 2010 |
| Hillel v. City of Agoura Hills | Counsel for the appellant | 334 F. App'x 126 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 October 2009 |
| Hillel v. City of Agoura Hills | Counsel for the appellant | 334 F. App'x 126 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 October 2009 |
| Budd v. City of Santa Maria | Counsel for the appellant | 266 F. App'x 661 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 February 2008 |
| Hale v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 244 F. App'x 135 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 July 2007 |
| Cruz v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 229 F. App'x 431 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 March 2007 |
| Patel v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the appellant | 207 F. App'x 752 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 November 2006 |
| AB Cellular LA, LLC v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 177 F. App'x 578 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 April 2006 |
| AB Cellular LA, LLC v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 177 F. App'x 578 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 April 2006 |
| Patel v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 154 F. App'x 650 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 November 2005 |
| Patel v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 155 F. App'x 269 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 November 2005 |
| Galal v. City of Long Beach | Counsel for the appellant | 149 F. App'x 682 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 September 2005 |
| People v. Dawodu | Counsel for the appellant | 122 F. App'x 884 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 December 2004 |
| Inland Valley Development Agency v. Patel | Counsel for the appellant | 116 F. App'x 98 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 November 2004 |
| Patel v. City of Anaheim | Counsel for the appellant | 78 F. App'x 596 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 October 2003 |
| Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. City of Oakland | Counsel for the appellant | 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8496 | California Supreme Court | 17 September 2003 |
| Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. City of Oakland | Counsel for the appellant | 344 F.3d 959 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 September 2003 |
| Smita Sanghvi Tarun Sanghvi v. City of Claremont, and Suzan Smith Paul Heid Algrid Leiga Diann Ring Karen Rosenthal Glenn D. Southard | Counsel for the appellant | 328 F.3d 532 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 May 2003 |
| Patel v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the appellant | 310 F.3d 1138 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 November 2002 |
| Patel v. City of San Bernardino | Counsel for the appellant | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11101 | California Supreme Court | 13 November 2002 |
| Patel v. Penman | Counsel for the appellant | 103 F.3d 868 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 December 1996 |
| Patel v. Penman | Counsel for the appellant | 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9430 | California Supreme Court | 26 December 1996 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Law Offices of Frank A. Weiser.
The law school on the record is Southwestern Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1979 · 47 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Civil Rights.
27 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Frank Alan Weiser’s license status, bar number #89780, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Civil Rights in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records