Attorney RecordPersonal Injury · San Mateo County
Frank Mario Pitre · Personal Injury Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Frank Mario Pitre is on California’s State Bar roll, #100077, admitted in 1981; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Burlingame, San Mateo County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Personal Injury. 23 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a personal injury matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #100077 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1981 |
| Law school | Univ of San Francisco |
| Firm | Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP |
| Location | Burlingame, San Mateo County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steinle v. City & County of San Francisco | Counsel for the plaintiff | 230 F. Supp. 3d 994 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 6 January 2017 |
| Gardiner Family, LLC v. Crimson Resource Management Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 147 F. Supp. 3d 1029 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 24 September 2015 |
| Sotelo v. Medianews Group, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 207 Cal. App. 4th 639 | California Court of Appeal | 31 May 2012 |
| Cataphora Inc. v. Parker | Counsel for the defendant | 848 F. Supp. 2d 1064 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 24 January 2012 |
| E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Counsel for the respondent | 432 F. App'x 657 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 April 2011 |
| State ex rel. McCann v. Bank of America, N.A. | Counsel for the appellant | 191 Cal. App. 4th 897 | California Court of Appeal | 11 January 2011 |
| Loretz v. Regal Stone, Ltd. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 756 F. Supp. 2d 1203 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 23 November 2010 |
| County of Santa Clara v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA CNTY. | Counsel for the petitioner | 50 Cal. 4th 35 | California Supreme Court | 26 July 2010 |
| Steering Committee v. Daniel E. Becnel, Jr. | Counsel for the respondent | 386 F. App'x 584 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 June 2010 |
| Terra Insurance v. New York Life Investment Management LLC | Counsel for the plaintiff | 717 F. Supp. 2d 883 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 11 May 2010 |
| Scarff v. Intuit, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 318 F. App'x 483 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 November 2008 |
| Scarff v. Intuit, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 318 F. App'x 483 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 November 2008 |
| Gomez v. California Physicians Service | Counsel for the appellant | 299 F. App'x 687 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 November 2008 |
| In Re Bextra & Celebrex Marketing Sales Practices & Product Liability Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 524 F. Supp. 2d 1166 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 19 November 2007 |
| E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. EnCana Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 503 F.3d 1027 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 September 2007 |
| Suzuki Motor Corporation and American Suzuki Motor Corporation v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., a Non-Profit New York Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 292 F.3d 1192 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 June 2002 |
| Suzuki Motor Corporation and American Suzuki Motor Corporation v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., a Non-Profit New York Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5641 | California Supreme Court | 25 June 2002 |
| Merrill v. Navegar, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 26 Cal. 4th 465 | California Supreme Court | 6 August 2001 |
| In Re Air Crash Off Point Mugu, California | Counsel for the plaintiff | 145 F. Supp. 2d 1156 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 1 May 2001 |
| City of Santa Cruz v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 82 Cal. App. 4th 1167 | California Court of Appeal | 8 August 2000 |
| Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 66 F. Supp. 2d 1117 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 September 1999 |
| Holmes v. Lerner | Counsel for the appellant | 74 Cal. App. 4th 442 | California Court of Appeal | 7 September 1999 |
| Klein v. Oakland Raiders, Ltd. | Counsel for the appellant | 211 Cal. App. 3d 67 | California Court of Appeal | 31 May 1989 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at cpmlegal.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is University of San Francisco School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1981 · 45 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Personal Injury.
23 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Burlingame, in San Mateo County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, seated at Redwood City.
Confirm Frank Mario Pitre’s license status, bar number #100077, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Personal Injury in San Mateo County: next on the roll
San Mateo County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records