Attorney RecordEmployment · San Francisco County
George Joseph Tichy, II · Employment Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
George Joseph Tichy, II is on California’s State Bar roll, #41146, admitted in 1967; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Employment. 22 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Littler Mendelson, P.C. Registry record updated 18 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a employment matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 18 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #41146 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1967 |
| Law school | Univ of Minnesota |
| Firm | Littler Mendelson, P.C. |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohnert v. Roman Catholic Archbishop | Counsel for the defendant | 67 F. Supp. 3d 1091 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 4 September 2014 |
| Wong v. HSBC Mortgage Corp. (USA) | Counsel for the defendant | 749 F. Supp. 2d 1009 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 September 2010 |
| Velasquez v. HSBC Finance Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 266 F.R.D. 424 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 18 February 2010 |
| National Labor Relations Board, and Social Services Union Local 535 Seiu, Afl-Cio, Intervenor v. Hanna Boys Center | Counsel for the respondent | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6261 | California Supreme Court | 30 October 1991 |
| National Labor Relations Board, and Social Services Union Local 535 Seiu, Afl-Cio, Intervenor v. Hanna Boys Center | Counsel for the respondent | 940 F.2d 1295 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 October 1991 |
| Hanna Boys Center v. Miller | Counsel for the appellant | 853 F.2d 682 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 August 1988 |
| Chipman Freight Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 843 F.2d 1224 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 April 1988 |
| Pacific Crown Distributors v. Brotherhood of Teamsters | Counsel for the respondent | 183 Cal. App. 3d 1138 | California Court of Appeal | 30 July 1986 |
| Watsonville Canning & Frozen Food Co. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 178 Cal. App. 3d 1242 | California Court of Appeal | 21 March 1986 |
| Triple E Produce Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 35 Cal. 3d 42 | California Supreme Court | 21 November 1983 |
| Campos v. Employment Development Department | Counsel for the respondent | 132 Cal. App. 3d 961 | California Court of Appeal | 21 June 1982 |
| California Trucking Ass'n v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers | Counsel for the respondent | 679 F.2d 1275 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 October 1981 |
| Canlis v. San Joaquin Sheriff's Posse Comitatus | Counsel for the respondent | 641 F.2d 711 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 April 1981 |
| L. J. Maxey, Jr., D/B/A King-O-Meat Co. v. Butchers' Union Local No. 126, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butchers Workmen Ofnorth America, Afl-Cio | Counsel for the respondent | 627 F.2d 912 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 October 1980 |
| National Labor Relations Board v. Masonic Homes of California, Inc., Hospital and Institutional Workers Union, Local 250, Intervenor | Counsel for the respondent | 624 F.2d 88 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 July 1980 |
| Yamada Bros. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the appellant | 99 Cal. App. 3d 112 | California Court of Appeal | 28 November 1979 |
| National Labor Relations Board v. Don Burgess Construction Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 596 F.2d 378 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 May 1979 |
| Nishikawa Farms, Inc. v. Mahony | Counsel for the appellant | 66 Cal. App. 3d 781 | California Court of Appeal | 3 February 1977 |
| Retail Clerks Union, Local 775 v. Purity Stores, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 41 Cal. App. 3d 225 | California Court of Appeal | 21 August 1974 |
| Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 of Alameda County | Counsel for the respondent | 472 F.2d 764 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 January 1973 |
| National Labor Relations Board v. Ivo H. Denham and Geraldine A. Denham, D/B/A the Denham Company | Counsel for the respondent | 469 F.2d 239 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 December 1972 |
| National Labor Relations Board v. Sky Wolf Sales, Etc. | Counsel for the respondent | 470 F.2d 827 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 December 1972 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Littler Mendelson, P.C.
The law school on the record is University of Minnesota.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1967 · 59 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Employment.
22 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm George Joseph Tichy, II’s license status, bar number #41146, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Employment in San Francisco County: next on the roll
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records