Attorney RecordSan Francisco County

Jack Williford Londen · California Lawyer

Call(415) 268-7415

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Jack Williford Londen is on California’s State Bar roll, #85776, admitted in 1979; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 10 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 22 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#85776
License statusActive
Admitted1979
Law schoolYale Univ
FirmMorrison & Foerster LLP
LocationSan Francisco, San Francisco County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Diamond members practicing Business Law in San Francisco County

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitemofo.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Nikon Corporation v. Asml U.S., Inc.Counsel for the respondent707 F. App'x 476U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit12 December 2017
Hardie v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCounsel for the appellant861 F.3d 875U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 June 2017
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.Counsel for the plaintiff258 F. Supp. 3d 1013U.S. District Court, Northern District of California23 June 2017
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.Counsel for the plaintiff67 F. Supp. 3d 1100U.S. District Court, Northern District of California8 September 2014
Reed v. United Teachers Los AngelesCounsel for the respondent208 Cal. App. 4th 322California Court of Appeal10 August 2012
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLCCounsel for the appellant625 F.3d 561U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit26 October 2010
Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLCCounsel for the defendant650 F. Supp. 2d 1004U.S. District Court, Central District of California31 July 2009
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLCCounsel for the respondent499 F.3d 923U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 August 2007
Robbins v. AlibrandiCounsel for the respondent127 Cal. App. 4th 438California Court of Appeal4 February 2005
Nikon Corp. v. ASM Lithography B.V.Counsel for the plaintiff222 F.R.D. 647U.S. District Court, Northern District of California6 August 2004
Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC.Counsel for the defendant221 F. Supp. 2d 1116U.S. District Court, Central District of California9 July 2002
In Re Wells Fargo Securities LitigationCounsel for the defendant991 F. Supp. 1193U.S. District Court, Northern District of California20 January 1998
In re Wells Fargo Securities LitigationCounsel for the defendant157 F.R.D. 467U.S. District Court, Northern District of California25 August 1994
In re Wells Fargo Securities LitigationCounsel for the defendant156 F.R.D. 223U.S. District Court, Northern District of California30 June 1994
In Re Verifone Securities LitigationCounsel for the defendant784 F. Supp. 1471U.S. District Court, Northern District of California21 February 1992
National Center for Youth Law v. Legal Services Corp.Counsel for the plaintiff749 F. Supp. 1013U.S. District Court, Northern District of California10 September 1990
Gagnon v. Continental Casualty Co.Counsel for the appellant211 Cal. App. 3d 1598California Court of Appeal14 July 1989
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. PaineWebber Real Estate Securities, Inc.Counsel for the defendant690 F. Supp. 879U.S. District Court, Northern District of California11 May 1988
Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp.Counsel for the defendant594 F. Supp. 1022U.S. District Court, Northern District of California4 September 1984
Hillery v. RushenCounsel for the respondent720 F.2d 1132U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 November 1983
G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.Counsel for the respondent147 Cal. App. 3d 256California Court of Appeal23 September 1983
Booker T. Hillery, Jr. v. Ruth L. Rushen, Etc.Counsel for the respondent702 F.2d 848U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1 April 1983

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Morrison & Foerster LLP.

A firm or employer website answers at mofo.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.

The law school on the record is Yale Law School.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1979 · 47 years on the roll.

10 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.

22 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Jack Williford Londen’s license status, bar number #85776, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Business Law in San Francisco County: next on the roll

San Francisco County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records