Attorney RecordSacramento County

Jaime M. Ganson · California Lawyer

Call(916) 210-7351

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Jaime M. Ganson is on California’s State Bar roll, #230206, admitted in 2004; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Sacramento, Sacramento County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Constitutional Law. 29 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Office of the Attorney General. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#230206
License statusActive
Admitted2004
Law schoolUC Davis SOL King Hall
FirmOffice of the Attorney General
LocationSacramento, Sacramento County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Gregory McClellan v. S. LozanoCounsel for the respondent695 F. App'x 298U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit15 August 2017
Kevin Brewer v. Yossi GrossbaumCounsel for the respondent670 F. App'x 552U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 November 2016
Kevin Brewer v. HadjaddCounsel for the defendant670 F. App'x 558U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 November 2016
John Lambertson v. G. D. LewisCounsel for the defendant648 F. App'x 734U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 April 2016
Rush Spinks, Jr. v. E. LopezCounsel for the defendant623 F. App'x 499U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 November 2015
Joaquin Ciria v. BlackwellCounsel for the respondent616 F. App'x 366U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 October 2015
Everett Gonzalez v. C. GardemalCounsel for the respondent599 F. App'x 292U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 March 2015
J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCounsel for the respondent772 F.3d 834U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 November 2014
Richard Isgrigg, III v. J. LebeckCounsel for the respondent585 F. App'x 373U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 October 2014
Robert Benyamini v. MendozaCounsel for the respondent584 F. App'x 606U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 August 2014
Raymond Newsom v. John ChokatosCounsel for the respondent584 F. App'x 445U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 August 2014
Gregory Norwood v. M. RobinsonCounsel for the defendant576 F. App'x 666U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit29 May 2014
Shannon Riley v. S. RoachCounsel for the respondent572 F. App'x 504U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit9 May 2014
David Johnson v. R. SubiaCounsel for the respondent559 F. App'x 655U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit3 March 2014
Kevin Bonilla v. JamisonCounsel for the respondent553 F. App'x 728U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 January 2014
Eric Knapp v. HoganCounsel for the respondent738 F.3d 1106U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit26 December 2013
Jaime Zepeda v. W. SullivanCounsel for the appellant543 F. App'x 729U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 October 2013
Claude Smith v. C. BoyerCounsel for the respondent540 F. App'x 816U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 October 2013
Randy Real v. James WalkerCounsel for the appellant521 F. App'x 629U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 May 2013
Geoffrey Wilson v. James TiltonCounsel for the defendant517 F. App'x 547U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 April 2013
Steven Vlasich v. Timothy FishbackCounsel for the respondent507 F. App'x 669U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 January 2013
Daniel Masterson v. Silvia Huerta-GarciaCounsel for the respondent499 F. App'x 687U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 November 2012
Gary Brush v. Peter Farber-SzekrenyiCounsel for the respondent487 F. App'x 418U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 November 2012
Keith Arline, Jr. v. Ken ClarkCounsel for the defendant486 F. App'x 662U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 October 2012
Robert Hackworth, Jr. v. P. RangelCounsel for the respondent482 F. App'x 299U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 September 2012
Gregory Norwood v. M. RobinsonCounsel for the respondent436 F. App'x 799U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 June 2011
Baker v. KernanCounsel for the defendant795 F. Supp. 2d 992U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California23 May 2011
David Wilson v. L. ZafraCounsel for the defendant376 F. App'x 784U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 April 2010
David Wilson v. K. WannCounsel for the defendant369 F. App'x 841U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 March 2010

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Office of the Attorney General.

The law school on the record is UC Davis School of Law King Hall.

Admitted to the California Bar in 2004 · 22 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Constitutional Law.

29 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in Sacramento, in Sacramento County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, seated at Sacramento.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Jaime M. Ganson’s license status, bar number #230206, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Sacramento County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records