Attorney RecordSanta Clara County
James McManis · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
James McManis is on California’s State Bar roll, #40958, admitted in 1967; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Jose, Santa Clara County. 8 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 29 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is McManis Faulkner. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #40958 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1967 |
| Law school | Univ of California Berkeley |
| Firm | McManis Faulkner |
| Location | San Jose, Santa Clara County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Persky v. Bushey | Counsel for the appellant | 21 Cal. App. 5th 810 | California Court of Appeal | 26 March 2018 |
| Haiping Su v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Counsel for the appellant | 711 F. App'x 444 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 February 2018 |
| Josephine Smith v. City of Santa Clara | Counsel for the appellant | 876 F.3d 987 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 November 2017 |
| People v. Conagra Grocery Prods. Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 17 Cal. App. 5th 51 | California Court of Appeal | 14 November 2017 |
| Ibrahim v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security | Counsel for the appellant | 835 F.3d 1048 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 August 2016 |
| Deniz Bolbol v. Feld Entertainment, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 613 F. App'x 623 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 June 2015 |
| Timothy White v. University of California | Counsel for the appellant | 765 F.3d 1010 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 August 2014 |
| Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Security | Counsel for the plaintiff | 62 F. Supp. 3d 909 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 January 2014 |
| Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance | Counsel for the plaintiff | 291 F.R.D. 425 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 21 June 2013 |
| Avidor v. Sutter's Place, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 212 Cal. App. 4th 1439 | California Court of Appeal | 23 January 2013 |
| Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Security | Counsel for the appellant | 669 F.3d 983 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 February 2012 |
| Sarah Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I | Counsel for the appellant | 391 F. App'x 653 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 August 2010 |
| Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 319 F. App'x 615 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 March 2009 |
| Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 319 F. App'x 615 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 March 2009 |
| Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Security | Counsel for the appellant | 538 F.3d 1250 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 August 2008 |
| Sutter's Place Inc. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 161 Cal. App. 4th 1370 | California Court of Appeal | 18 March 2008 |
| G & C Auto Body Inc. v. GEICO General Insurance | Counsel for the plaintiff | 552 F. Supp. 2d 1015 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 11 March 2008 |
| Ramalingam v. Thompson | Counsel for the appellant | 151 Cal. App. 4th 491 | California Court of Appeal | 29 May 2007 |
| CITY OF MONTE SERENO v. Padgett | Counsel for the appellant | 149 Cal. App. 4th 1530 | California Court of Appeal | 23 April 2007 |
| County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 137 Cal. App. 4th 292 | California Court of Appeal | 3 March 2006 |
| Tucker v. Intel Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 141 F. App'x 524 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 July 2005 |
| David K. Huskey v. City of San Jose Joan Gallo George Rios Ralph Greene | Counsel for the respondent | 204 F.3d 893 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 February 2000 |
| David K. Huskey v. City of San Jose Joan Gallo George Rios Ralph Greene | Counsel for the respondent | 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1403 | California Supreme Court | 24 February 2000 |
| Mann v. Department of Motor Vehicles | Counsel for the appellant | 76 Cal. App. 4th 312 | California Court of Appeal | 20 October 1999 |
| Xi Zhao v. Wong | Counsel for the appellant | 48 Cal. App. 4th 1114 | California Court of Appeal | 20 August 1996 |
| Fenwick & West v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 43 Cal. App. 4th 1272 | California Court of Appeal | 26 February 1996 |
| Xi Zhao v. Tai-Shing Wong | Counsel for the respondent | 40 Cal. App. 4th 1198 | California Court of Appeal | 7 December 1995 |
| Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob Diridon | Counsel for the appellant | 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4212 | California Supreme Court | 9 June 1993 |
| Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob Diridon | Counsel for the appellant | 995 F.2d 898 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 June 1993 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is McManis Faulkner.
A firm or employer website answers at mcmanislaw.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UC Berkeley School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1967 · 59 years on the roll.
8 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
29 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Jose, in Santa Clara County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, seated at San Jose.
Confirm James McManis’s license status, bar number #40958, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Santa Clara County: next on the roll
Santa Clara County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records