Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Jay Robert Weill · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Jay Robert Weill is on California’s State Bar roll, #75434, admitted in 1977; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Criminal Defense and Tax. 41 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 21 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a criminal defense matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 21 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #75434 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1977 |
| Law school | George Washington Univ LS |
| Firm | Sideman & Bancroft LLP |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schwab v. Commissioner | Counsel for the respondent | 715 F.3d 1169 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 April 2013 |
| United States v. Sideman & Bancroft, LLP | Counsel for the appellant | 704 F.3d 1197 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 January 2013 |
| Candyce Martin 1999 Irrevocable Trust v. United States | Counsel for the petitioner | 822 F. Supp. 2d 968 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 6 October 2011 |
| Baccei v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 632 F.3d 1140 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 February 2011 |
| Miller v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 209 F. App'x 690 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 December 2006 |
| United States v. Holland | Counsel for the respondent | 203 F. App'x 54 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 October 2006 |
| United States v. Bronte | Counsel for the respondent | 172 F. App'x 767 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 March 2006 |
| Miller v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 345 F. Supp. 2d 1046 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 22 November 2004 |
| United States v. Chevrontexoco Corp. | Counsel for the petitioner | 241 F. Supp. 2d 1065 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 September 2002 |
| United States v. Soon Dong Han | Counsel for the plaintiff | 181 F. Supp. 2d 1039 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 11 January 2002 |
| San Francisco Baseball Associates L.P. v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 88 F. Supp. 2d 1087 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 3 March 2000 |
| Shotgun Delivery, Inc. v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 85 F. Supp. 2d 962 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 20 January 2000 |
| United States v. Bell | Counsel for the petitioner | 57 F. Supp. 2d 898 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 22 June 1999 |
| Bellus v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 198 B.R. 792 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 2 October 1995 |
| United States v. Redevelopment Agency of City of Oakland | Counsel for the plaintiff | 926 F. Supp. 928 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 August 1995 |
| Cooke v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 796 F. Supp. 1298 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 26 March 1992 |
| Miller v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 763 F. Supp. 1534 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 6 May 1991 |
| Garcia v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 714 F. Supp. 1036 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 24 February 1989 |
| United States v. Aleksandrs v. Laurins | Counsel for the respondent | 857 F.2d 529 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 September 1988 |
| William E. Schrambling Accountancy Corp. v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 689 F. Supp. 1001 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 18 April 1988 |
| Husby v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 672 F. Supp. 442 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 6 November 1987 |
| In re Frazier | Counsel for the appellant | 82 B.R. 114 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 2 October 1987 |
| Peinado v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 669 F. Supp. 953 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 23 June 1987 |
| United States v. Laurins | Counsel for the plaintiff | 660 F. Supp. 1579 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 2 June 1987 |
| Figur v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 662 F. Supp. 515 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 19 May 1987 |
| United States v. Laurins | Counsel for the plaintiff | 659 F. Supp. 847 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 7 May 1987 |
| Crouch v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 665 F. Supp. 813 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 April 1987 |
| Transamerica Corp. v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 670 F. Supp. 1454 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 5 November 1986 |
| Medina v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 664 F. Supp. 1318 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 June 1986 |
| United States v. Shortt Accountancy Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 785 F.2d 1448 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 April 1986 |
| Reggi v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 632 F. Supp. 5 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 4 March 1986 |
| Commissioner v. Hayes | Counsel for the respondent | 631 F. Supp. 785 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 6 December 1985 |
| Filice v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 621 F. Supp. 1184 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 20 November 1985 |
| United Energy Corp. v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 622 F. Supp. 43 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 3 July 1985 |
| Engineers Club of San Francisco v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 609 F. Supp. 519 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 February 1985 |
| United States v. Stephens | Counsel for the plaintiff | 568 F. Supp. 1198 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 18 August 1983 |
| Certified Stainless Services, Inc. v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 569 F. Supp. 302 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 June 1983 |
| Margolis v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 570 F. Supp. 170 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 25 April 1983 |
| Potlatch Corp. v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 548 F. Supp. 155 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 30 September 1982 |
| Lee v. National Collection Agency, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 543 F. Supp. 920 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 19 July 1982 |
| Gerdes v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 498 F. Supp. 385 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 20 August 1980 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Sideman & Bancroft LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at sideman.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is George Washington University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1977 · 49 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Criminal Defense and Tax.
41 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Jay Robert Weill’s license status, bar number #75434, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Criminal Defense in San Francisco County: next on the roll
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records