Attorney RecordLitigation · San Francisco County

Jeffrey Robert Chanin · Litigation Attorney

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Jeffrey Robert Chanin is on California’s State Bar roll, #103649, admitted in 1982; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Litigation. 17 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a litigation matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#103649
License statusActive
Admitted1982
Law schoolUniv of Chicago
FirmKeker, Van Nest & Peters LLP
LocationSan Francisco, San Francisco County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Diamond members practicing Litigation in San Francisco County

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitekeker.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Sandisk Corp. v. SK Hynix Inc.Counsel for the plaintiff84 F. Supp. 3d 1021U.S. District Court, Northern District of California26 March 2015
Ziptronix, Inc. v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc.Counsel for the defendant71 F. Supp. 3d 1090U.S. District Court, Northern District of California21 October 2014
Robert Matz v. Cepia L.L.C.Counsel for the respondent560 F. App'x 678U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 March 2014
TSMC North America v. Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp.Counsel for the appellant161 Cal. App. 4th 581California Court of Appeal27 March 2008
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.Counsel for the plaintiff477 F. Supp. 2d 1063U.S. District Court, Northern District of California20 February 2007
Cadence Design Systems v. Avant! CorporationCounsel for the appellant29 Cal. 4th 215California Supreme Court21 November 2002
San Francisco Baykeeper v. VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICTCounsel for the plaintiff36 F. Supp. 2d 1214U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California1 March 1999
Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. BrobeckCounsel for the respondent18 Cal. 4th 739California Supreme Court30 July 1998
Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCounsel for the respondent18 Cal. 4th 739California Supreme Court30 July 1998
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Avant! Corp.Counsel for the appellant97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7544California Supreme Court23 September 1997
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Avant! Corp.Counsel for the appellant125 F.3d 824U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 September 1997
Lockheed Missile & Space Co. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Counsel for the plaintiff887 F. Supp. 1320U.S. District Court, Northern District of California7 June 1995
Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.Counsel for the defendant152 F.R.D. 188U.S. District Court, Northern District of California12 October 1993
Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.Counsel for the defendant822 F. Supp. 634U.S. District Court, Northern District of California30 April 1993
Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.Counsel for the defendant804 F. Supp. 35U.S. District Court, Northern District of California2 September 1992
United States v. David C. HilgerCounsel for the respondent867 F.2d 566U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit10 February 1989
United States v. Christopher P. MurphyCounsel for the respondent809 F.2d 1427U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit10 February 1987

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP.

The law school on the record is University of Chicago.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1982 · 44 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Litigation.

17 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Jeffrey Robert Chanin’s license status, bar number #103649, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Litigation in San Francisco County: next on the roll

San Francisco County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records