Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Jeremy B. Rosen · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Jeremy B. Rosen is on California’s State Bar roll, #192473, admitted in 1997; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law. This profile lists one third-party recognition, in Chambers USA 2026, as published by Chambers and Partners. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #192473 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1997 |
| Law school | Duke Univ |
| Firm | Horvitz & Levy LLP |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing in San Francisco County
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quidel Corp. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty. | Counsel for the petitioner | 39 Cal. App. 5th 530 | California Court of Appeal | 29 August 2019 |
| Han v. Hallberg | Counsel for the appellant | 35 Cal. App. 5th 621 | California Court of Appeal | 21 May 2019 |
| S.Y. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty. | Counsel for the petitioner | 29 Cal. App. 5th 324 | California Court of Appeal | 21 November 2018 |
| Lopez v. Sony Electronics, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 5 Cal. 5th 627 | California Supreme Court | 5 July 2018 |
| Abbott Labs. v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty. | Counsel for the petitioner | 24 Cal. App. 5th 1 | California Court of Appeal | 31 May 2018 |
| Benaroya v. Willis | Counsel for the respondent | 23 Cal. App. 5th 462 | California Court of Appeal | 17 May 2018 |
| Kanno v. Marwit Capital Partners II, L.P. | Counsel for the appellant | 18 Cal. App. 5th 987 | California Court of Appeal | 22 December 2017 |
| Aaron Hahn v. Doug Waddington | Counsel for the appellant | 694 F. App'x 494 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 June 2017 |
| Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Court of San Mateo County | Counsel for the petitioner | 10 Cal. App. 5th 563 | California Court of Appeal | 5 April 2017 |
| Byrd v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors | Counsel for the appellant | 845 F.3d 919 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 January 2017 |
| Healthsmart Pacific, Inc. v. Kabateck | Counsel for the appellant | 7 Cal. App. 5th 416 | California Court of Appeal | 19 December 2016 |
| Wang v. Nibbelink | Counsel for the respondent | 4 Cal. App. 5th 1 | California Court of Appeal | 13 October 2016 |
| Rosemary Garity v. Apwu National Labor Org. | Counsel for the appellant | 828 F.3d 848 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 July 2016 |
| Beverly Hills Unified School District v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority | Counsel for the appellant | 241 Cal. App. 4th 627 | California Court of Appeal | 22 October 2015 |
| Raef v. Appellate Division of the Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 240 Cal. App. 4th 1112 | California Court of Appeal | 30 September 2015 |
| City of San Diego v. Board of Trustees of the California State University | Counsel for the respondent | 61 Cal. 4th 945 | California Supreme Court | 3 August 2015 |
| Maria Escobedo v. Apple American Group | Counsel for the appellant | 787 F.3d 1226 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 June 2015 |
| Juan Falcon v. M. Farley | Counsel for the appellant | 604 F. App'x 581 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 2015 |
| Bergstein v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP | Counsel for the appellant | 236 Cal. App. 4th 793 | California Court of Appeal | 1 May 2015 |
| Berman v. Regents of the University of California | Counsel for the appellant | 229 Cal. App. 4th 1265 | California Court of Appeal | 19 September 2014 |
| Zina Butler v. Housing Auth. County of La | Counsel for the appellant | 766 F.3d 1191 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 September 2014 |
| Zina Butler v. Housing Auth. County of La | Counsel for the appellant | 14 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10 | California Supreme Court | 12 September 2014 |
| Roger Cleveland Golf Co. v. Krane & Smith, APC | Counsel for the appellant | 225 Cal. App. 4th 660 | California Court of Appeal | 15 April 2014 |
| Gonzales v. California Department of Corrections | Counsel for the appellant | 739 F.3d 1226 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 January 2014 |
| Mave Enterprises, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 219 Cal. App. 4th 1408 | California Court of Appeal | 26 September 2013 |
| Jay v. Mahaffey CA4/3 | Counsel for the respondent | 218 Cal. App. 4th 1522 | California Court of Appeal | 31 July 2013 |
| Malin v. Singer | Counsel for the appellant | 217 Cal. App. 4th 1283 | California Court of Appeal | 16 July 2013 |
| Donovan v. Dan Murphy Foundation | Counsel for the appellant | 204 Cal. App. 4th 1500 | California Court of Appeal | 18 April 2012 |
| Rasmussen v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 51 Cal. 4th 804 | California Supreme Court | 5 May 2011 |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lee | Counsel for the respondent | 193 Cal. App. 4th 34 | California Court of Appeal | 31 January 2011 |
| Snatchko v. Westfield llC | Counsel for the respondent | 187 Cal. App. 4th 469 | California Court of Appeal | 11 August 2010 |
| County of Los Angeles v. GLENDORA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT | Counsel for the appellant | 185 Cal. App. 4th 817 | California Court of Appeal | 15 June 2010 |
| Runyon v. Board of Trustees of California State University | Counsel for the respondent | 48 Cal. 4th 760 | California Supreme Court | 3 May 2010 |
| PrediWave Corp. v. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | Counsel for the appellant | 179 Cal. App. 4th 1204 | California Court of Appeal | 2 December 2009 |
| Christoff v. Nestle USA, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 47 Cal. 4th 468 | California Supreme Court | 17 August 2009 |
| Huber v. Jackson | Counsel for the respondent | 175 Cal. App. 4th 663 | California Court of Appeal | 9 June 2009 |
| Ying Qing Chen v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 331 F. App'x 503 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 June 2009 |
| Ying Qing Chen v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 331 F. App'x 503 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 June 2009 |
| Episcopal Church Cases | Counsel for the appellant | 45 Cal. 4th 467 | California Supreme Court | 5 January 2009 |
| Garcia v. Paramount Citrus Assn., Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 164 Cal. App. 4th 1448 | California Court of Appeal | 21 July 2008 |
| Holdgrafer v. Unocal Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 160 Cal. App. 4th 907 | California Court of Appeal | 4 March 2008 |
| In Re Tobacco Cases II | Counsel for the respondent | 41 Cal. 4th 1257 | California Supreme Court | 2 August 2007 |
| Sterling v. Taylor | Counsel for the respondent | 40 Cal. 4th 757 | California Supreme Court | 1 March 2007 |
| Koebke v. Bernardo Heights Country Club | Counsel for the respondent | 36 Cal. 4th 824 | California Supreme Court | 1 August 2005 |
| Armijo v. Miles | Counsel for the respondent | 127 Cal. App. 4th 1405 | California Court of Appeal | 30 March 2005 |
| Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Delfino | Counsel for the appellant | 35 Cal. 4th 180 | California Supreme Court | 3 March 2005 |
| Goldstein v. Ralphs Grocery Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 122 Cal. App. 4th 229 | California Court of Appeal | 13 September 2004 |
| Goldstein v. Ralphs Grocery Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 122 Cal. App. 4th 229 | California Court of Appeal | 13 September 2004 |
| Hard v. California State Employees Assn. | Counsel for the appellant | 112 Cal. App. 4th 1343 | California Court of Appeal | 29 October 2003 |
| Juarez v. 21st Century Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 105 Cal. App. 4th 371 | California Court of Appeal | 15 January 2003 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 4, Litigation: Appellate (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Horvitz & Levy LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Horvitz & Levy LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at horvitzlevy.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Duke University.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1997 · 29 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Jeremy B. Rosen’s license status, bar number #192473, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records