Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
John Frank Barg · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
John Frank Barg is on California’s State Bar roll, #60230, admitted in 1974; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Environmental Law. 47 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Beveridge and Diamond LLP. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #60230 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1974 |
| Law school | Golden Gate Univ |
| Firm | Beveridge and Diamond LLP |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing in San Francisco County
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNITED ALLOYS, INC. v. Baker | Counsel for the defendant | 797 F. Supp. 2d 974 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 22 June 2011 |
| Abarca v. Franklin County Water District | Counsel for the defendant | 761 F. Supp. 2d 1007 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 5 January 2011 |
| Pacific Sound Resources v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 286 F. App'x 381 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 July 2008 |
| United States v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 520 F.3d 918 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 March 2008 |
| United States v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 502 F.3d 781 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 September 2007 |
| United States v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 479 F.3d 1113 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 March 2007 |
| San Francisco Baykeeper v. Cargill Salt Division | Counsel for the appellant | 481 F.3d 700 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 March 2007 |
| Brucia v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity | Counsel for the plaintiff | 307 F. Supp. 2d 1079 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 22 January 2003 |
| United States Ex Rel. Hansen v. Cargill, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 107 F. Supp. 2d 1172 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 24 July 2000 |
| San Francisco Drydock, Inc. v. Dalton | Counsel for the defendant | 131 F.3d 776 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 November 1997 |
| Citizens for a Better Environment—California v. Union Oil of California | Counsel for the defendant | 996 F. Supp. 934 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 15 April 1997 |
| California Public Interest Research Group v. Shell Oil Co. | Counsel for the defendant | 840 F. Supp. 712 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 22 December 1993 |
| Schwoerer v. Union Oil Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 14 Cal. App. 4th 103 | California Court of Appeal | 12 March 1993 |
| Santa Fe Pacific Realty Corp. v. United States | Counsel for the plaintiff | 780 F. Supp. 687 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 10 December 1991 |
| Western World Insurance v. Dana | Counsel for the defendant | 765 F. Supp. 1011 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 20 June 1991 |
| Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co. of California | Counsel for the defendant | 716 F. Supp. 429 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 May 1989 |
| Citicorp Services, Inc. v. Gillespie | Counsel for the plaintiff | 712 F. Supp. 749 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 2 March 1989 |
| Sierra Club, a California Non-Profit Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California, a California Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 853 F.2d 667 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 July 1988 |
| Lynch v. Rank | Counsel for the defendant | 639 F. Supp. 69 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 18 December 1985 |
| Lynch v. Rank | Counsel for the defendant | 639 F. Supp. 66 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 20 August 1985 |
| Lazarich v. Heckler | Counsel for the defendant | 593 F. Supp. 766 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 20 August 1984 |
| Dellums v. Smith | Counsel for the defendant | 577 F. Supp. 1449 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 January 1984 |
| Dellums v. Smith | Counsel for the defendant | 577 F. Supp. 1456 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 January 1984 |
| Salmeron v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 724 F.2d 1357 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 December 1983 |
| Castorena v. Heckler | Counsel for the defendant | 575 F. Supp. 316 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 December 1983 |
| Taylor v. Heckler | Counsel for the defendant | 576 F. Supp. 1172 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 December 1983 |
| Karen Woods and Gary Woods v. United States of America, Department of the Army, Letterman Army Medical Center | Counsel for the respondent | 720 F.2d 1451 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 November 1983 |
| Dellums v. Smith | Counsel for the defendant | 573 F. Supp. 1489 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 3 November 1983 |
| Herron v. Heckler | Counsel for the defendant | 576 F. Supp. 218 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 31 October 1983 |
| Dr. Audrey S. Koh v. Secretary of the Air Force | Counsel for the appellant | 719 F.2d 1384 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 August 1983 |
| United States v. Articles of Drug Consisting of Following: An Undetermined Quantity of 100-Capsule Bottles, Labeled in Part: (Bottle) Imported From New Zealand Neptone Lyophilizied-Homogenized Mussels | Counsel for the plaintiff | 568 F. Supp. 1182 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 15 August 1983 |
| Guam Contractors Ass'n v. United States Department of Labor | Counsel for the defendant | 570 F. Supp. 163 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 15 April 1983 |
| Burbage v. Schweiker | Counsel for the defendant | 559 F. Supp. 1371 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 31 March 1983 |
| Guillermo A. Saavedra, Individually and Doing Business as Saagan Moving & Storage Company v. Raymond Donovan, Secretary of Labor | Counsel for the respondent | 700 F.2d 496 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 February 1983 |
| Von Tagen by and Through Von Tagen v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 557 F. Supp. 256 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 3 February 1983 |
| Rogers v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development | Counsel for the defendant | 96 F.R.D. 149 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 5 November 1982 |
| United States Ex Rel. Weiss v. Schwartz | Counsel for the plaintiff | 546 F. Supp. 422 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 30 August 1982 |
| Koh v. Secretary of Air Force | Counsel for the respondent | 559 F. Supp. 852 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 July 1982 |
| Hoang Ha v. Schweiker | Counsel for the defendant | 541 F. Supp. 711 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 23 June 1982 |
| Young v. Schweiker | Counsel for the defendant | 541 F. Supp. 620 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 21 June 1982 |
| Reynoso v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 537 F. Supp. 978 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 26 April 1982 |
| Davis v. Schweiker | Counsel for the defendant | 536 F. Supp. 90 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 8 February 1982 |
| Stewart v. United States Postal Service | Counsel for the defendant | 508 F. Supp. 112 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 23 December 1980 |
| Gerald J. Hoesl v. United States of America, Dr. David Allen Kasuboski | Counsel for the respondent | 629 F.2d 586 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 October 1980 |
| James v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 483 F. Supp. 581 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 January 1980 |
| Hoesl v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 451 F. Supp. 1170 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 26 April 1978 |
| I.M.A.G.E. v. Bailar | Counsel for the defendant | 78 F.R.D. 549 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 28 March 1978 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Beveridge and Diamond LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at bdlaw.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Golden Gate University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1974 · 52 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Environmental Law.
47 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm John Frank Barg’s license status, bar number #60230, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records