Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
John J Bartko · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
John J Bartko is on California’s State Bar roll, #37372, admitted in 1966; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 8 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 21 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 6 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 6 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #37372 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1966 |
| Law school | Univ of California Berkeley |
| Firm | Bartko Pavia LLP |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing Business Law in San Francisco County
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estate of Marcos Human Rights Litigation v. Estate of Marcos | Counsel for the appellant | 496 F. App'x 759 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 October 2012 |
| Hilao v. Estate of Marcos | Counsel for the defendant | 393 F.3d 987 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 December 2004 |
| Deutsch v. Turner Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 317 F.3d 1005 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 2003 |
| Deutsch v. Turner Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 324 F.3d 692 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 2003 |
| Stearns & Co. v. Daisy System Corp. (In re Daisy System Corp.) | Counsel for the appellant | 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7123 | California Supreme Court | 24 September 1996 |
| Stearns & Co. v. Daisy System Corp. (In re Daisy System Corp.) | Counsel for the appellant | 97 F.3d 1171 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 September 1996 |
| United States v. Sarno | Counsel for the appellant | 73 F.3d 1470 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 December 1995 |
| Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro v. Lerner | Counsel for the appellant | 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6179 | California Supreme Court | 15 August 1994 |
| Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro v. Lerner | Counsel for the appellant | 31 F.3d 924 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 August 1994 |
| United States v. Hal Brown, Jr., United States of America v. Michael F. Tobey | Counsel for the appellant | 936 F.2d 1042 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 June 1991 |
| United States v. Hal Brown, Jr., United States of America v. Michael F. Tobey | Counsel for the appellant | 925 F.2d 1182 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 February 1991 |
| United States v. Hal Brown, Jr., United States of America v. Michael F. Tobey | Counsel for the appellant | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1173 | California Supreme Court | 15 February 1991 |
| Citibank International v. Collier-Traino, Inc. v. Umma Bank, Applicant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 809 F.2d 1438 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 February 1987 |
| Republic of Philippines Ex Rel. Central Bank of the Philippines v. Marcos | Counsel for the defendant | 665 F. Supp. 793 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 11 February 1987 |
| Estate of Silme G. Domingo v. Republic of the Philippines, Appeal of Ferdinand E. Marcos | Counsel for the appellant | 808 F.2d 1349 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 January 1987 |
| Ramon Azurin v. William Von Raab, Commissioner of Customs of the United States Customs Service | Counsel for the respondent | 792 F.2d 914 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 1986 |
| United States v. Clinton Johnson | Counsel for the respondent | 423 F.2d 621 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 April 1970 |
| United States of America, and v. James Daniels, Jr., And | Counsel for the respondent | 412 F.2d 317 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 July 1969 |
| Lind v. Staats | Counsel for the defendant | 289 F. Supp. 182 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 7 August 1968 |
| United States v. Louie | Counsel for the plaintiff | 289 F. Supp. 850 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 31 July 1968 |
| Harry Lee Debano v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 391 F.2d 265 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 February 1968 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Bartko Pavia LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at bartkopavia.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UC Berkeley School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1966 · 60 years on the roll.
8 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
21 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm John J Bartko’s license status, bar number #37372, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in San Francisco County: next on the roll
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records
