Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Jose A. Zelidon-Zepeda · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Jose A. Zelidon-Zepeda is on California’s State Bar roll, #227108, admitted in 2003; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 45 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is San Francisco City Attorney's Office. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #227108 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 2003 |
| Law school | Santa Clara Univ |
| Firm | San Francisco City Attorney's Office |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing in San Francisco County
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welchen v. Cnty. of Sacramento | Counsel for the defendant | 343 F. Supp. 3d 924 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 24 October 2018 |
| Ctr. for Competitive Politics v. Harris | Counsel for the defendant | 296 F. Supp. 3d 1219 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 30 October 2017 |
| Mark Haynie v. Kamala Harris | Counsel for the respondent | 658 F. App'x 834 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 August 2016 |
| Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Harris | Counsel for the defendant | 182 F. Supp. 3d 1049 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 21 April 2016 |
| Joe Abbott v. E. Tootell | Counsel for the appellant | 631 F. App'x 487 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 January 2016 |
| Shondel Larkin v. K. Thomas, Sr. | Counsel for the respondent | 631 F. App'x 489 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 January 2016 |
| David Reyes v. Christopher Smith | Counsel for the respondent | 810 F.3d 654 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 January 2016 |
| Ferdinand Reynolds v. Kirk Gerstel | Counsel for the respondent | 624 F. App'x 522 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 December 2015 |
| Keith Bridgewater v. Sweeny | Counsel for the respondent | 609 F. App'x 446 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 July 2015 |
| Philip Rosati v. Dr. Igbinoso | Counsel for the respondent | 791 F.3d 1037 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 June 2015 |
| Dennis Walker v. Beard | Counsel for the respondent | 789 F.3d 1125 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 June 2015 |
| Juan Falcon v. M. Farley | Counsel for the respondent | 604 F. App'x 581 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 2015 |
| Carmon Warren v. J. Shawnego | Counsel for the respondent | 599 F. App'x 725 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 April 2015 |
| Norsworthy v. Beard | Counsel for the defendant | 87 F. Supp. 3d 1164 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 2 April 2015 |
| Norsworthy v. Beard | Counsel for the defendant | 87 F. Supp. 3d 1104 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 31 March 2015 |
| Maurice Olivier v. L. Scribner | Counsel for the respondent | 598 F. App'x 504 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 March 2015 |
| George Pasion v. John Haviland | Counsel for the respondent | 597 F. App'x 908 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 December 2014 |
| Hypolite v. California Department of Corrections | Counsel for the respondent | 585 F. App'x 628 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 November 2014 |
| Carmon Warren v. J. Shawnego | Counsel for the respondent | 585 F. App'x 517 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 October 2014 |
| Thomas Heilman v. L. Sanchez | Counsel for the appellant | 583 F. App'x 837 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 July 2014 |
| Anthony Robinson v. Anthony Lamarque | Counsel for the respondent | 581 F. App'x 695 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 July 2014 |
| Gregory Norwood v. James Tilton | Counsel for the respondent | 576 F. App'x 667 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 May 2014 |
| Marciano Plata v. Edmund Brown, Jr. | Counsel for the appellant | 754 F.3d 1070 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 May 2014 |
| Kennard Davis v. James Walker | Counsel for the respondent | 745 F.3d 1303 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 March 2014 |
| Dorrough v. Ruff | Counsel for the respondent | 552 F. App'x 728 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 2014 |
| Christopher Carrea, Jr. v. State of California | Counsel for the respondent | 551 F. App'x 368 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 January 2014 |
| Andrew Lopez v. S. Cook | Counsel for the respondent | 533 F. App'x 763 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 July 2013 |
| Carlos Castro v. Cal Terhune | Counsel for the respondent | 712 F.3d 1304 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 April 2013 |
| Ronald Reed v. B. Williams | Counsel for the respondent | 513 F. App'x 661 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 March 2013 |
| Berlan Dicey v. S. Pickens | Counsel for the respondent | 506 F. App'x 647 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 January 2013 |
| Randall Grimes v. Arron Pfiel | Counsel for the respondent | 502 F. App'x 701 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 January 2013 |
| Irving Humphrey v. James Yates | Counsel for the respondent | 486 F. App'x 661 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 October 2012 |
| Luis Garces v. Degadeo | Counsel for the respondent | 475 F. App'x 160 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 July 2012 |
| Josh Thomas v. D. Carrasco | Counsel for the respondent | 474 F. App'x 692 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 July 2012 |
| Robert Hackworth, Jr. v. H. German | Counsel for the respondent | 471 F. App'x 587 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 March 2012 |
| Barry Lamon v. D. Lytle | Counsel for the respondent | 465 F. App'x 717 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 January 2012 |
| Michael Holtsinger v. Tonya Voros | Counsel for the respondent | 442 F. App'x 333 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 July 2011 |
| Mark Muszynski v. D. L. Runnels | Counsel for the respondent | 441 F. App'x 483 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 July 2011 |
| Maria Del Rosario Corona v. Mike Knowles | Counsel for the respondent | 423 F. App'x 695 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 March 2011 |
| Frank Fernandez v. Susan Risenhoover | Counsel for the respondent | 399 F. App'x 260 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 October 2010 |
| Clark v. California | Counsel for the defendant | 739 F. Supp. 2d 1168 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 September 2010 |
| John Armstrong v. Arnold Schwarzenegger | Counsel for the appellant | 392 F. App'x 532 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 August 2010 |
| McCoy v. Cox | Counsel for the respondent | 334 F. App'x 139 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 October 2009 |
| McCoy v. Cox | Counsel for the respondent | 334 F. App'x 139 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 October 2009 |
| Armstrong v. Schwarzenegger | Counsel for the defendant | 261 F.R.D. 173 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 September 2009 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is San Francisco City Attorney's Office.
The law school on the record is Santa Clara University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 2003 · 23 years on the roll.
45 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Jose A. Zelidon-Zepeda’s license status, bar number #227108, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records