Attorney RecordImmigration · San Mateo County
Joseph John Siguenza · Immigration Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Joseph John Siguenza is on California’s State Bar roll, #92327, admitted in 1980; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Burlingame, San Mateo County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Immigration. 49 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Law Offices of Ashwani Bakhri. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a immigration matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #92327 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1980 |
| Law school | Pepperdine Univ SOL |
| Firm | Law Offices of Ashwani Bakhri |
| Location | Burlingame, San Mateo County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardip Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 585 F. App'x 942 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 November 2014 |
| Bindu Neupane v. Eric Holder, Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 573 F. App'x 668 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 2014 |
| Anjuman Yara v. Eric Holder, Jr. | Counsel for the respondent | 552 F. App'x 732 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 2014 |
| Madhu Shury v. Eric Holder, Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 546 F. App'x 669 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 November 2013 |
| Ravinder Mahli v. Eric Holder, Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 522 F. App'x 404 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 June 2013 |
| Jaspal Singh v. Eric H. Holder Jr | Counsel for the petitioner | 515 F. App'x 697 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 April 2013 |
| Nand v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 458 F. App'x 635 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 November 2011 |
| Sharma v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 433 F. App'x 538 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 May 2011 |
| Pannu v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 639 F.3d 1225 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 May 2011 |
| Rodriguez Rodriguez v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 427 F. App'x 597 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 April 2011 |
| Kumar v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 355 F. App'x 998 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 December 2009 |
| Kaur v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 336 F. App'x 668 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 2009 |
| Kaur v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 336 F. App'x 668 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 2009 |
| Kumar v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 338 F. App'x 566 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 June 2009 |
| Kumar v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 338 F. App'x 566 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 June 2009 |
| Tamayo-Menchaca v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 327 F. App'x 43 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 May 2009 |
| Tamayo-Menchaca v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 327 F. App'x 43 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 May 2009 |
| Vasquez v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 325 F. App'x 518 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 April 2009 |
| Vasquez v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 325 F. App'x 518 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 April 2009 |
| Singh v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 311 F. App'x 978 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 February 2009 |
| Singh v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 311 F. App'x 978 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 February 2009 |
| Sinha v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 564 F.3d 1015 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 February 2009 |
| Dutt v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 308 F. App'x 96 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 January 2009 |
| Dutt v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 308 F. App'x 96 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 January 2009 |
| Singh v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 305 F. App'x 455 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 December 2008 |
| Singh v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 305 F. App'x 455 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 December 2008 |
| Mendez v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 291 F. App'x 13 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 August 2008 |
| Kumar v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 282 F. App'x 526 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 June 2008 |
| Kumar v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 555 F. Supp. 2d 1061 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 6 May 2008 |
| Singh v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 270 F. App'x 714 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 March 2008 |
| Gill v. Keisler | Counsel for the petitioner | 252 F. App'x 799 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 October 2007 |
| Narayan v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 220 F. App'x 691 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 February 2007 |
| Singh v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 220 F. App'x 553 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 February 2007 |
| Singh v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 176 F. App'x 902 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 May 2006 |
| Singh v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 176 F. App'x 902 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 May 2006 |
| Singh v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 177 F. App'x 540 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 April 2006 |
| Singh v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 177 F. App'x 540 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 April 2006 |
| Singh v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 171 F. App'x 65 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 March 2006 |
| Lata v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 165 F. App'x 563 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 February 2006 |
| Sharma v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 159 F. App'x 750 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 November 2005 |
| Prasad v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 133 F. App'x 396 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 May 2005 |
| Surender Jeet Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General | Counsel for the petitioner | 393 F.3d 903 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 December 2004 |
| Singh v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the petitioner | 91 F. App'x 558 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 February 2004 |
| Singh v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the petitioner | 89 F. App'x 62 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 February 2004 |
| Wati v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the petitioner | 89 F. App'x 40 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 February 2004 |
| Deo v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the petitioner | 89 F. App'x 8 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 February 2004 |
| Anganu v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the petitioner | 85 F. App'x 590 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 January 2004 |
| Singh v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the petitioner | 84 F. App'x 765 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 December 2003 |
| Rihal v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the petitioner | 81 F. App'x 906 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 November 2003 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Law Offices of Ashwani Bakhri.
The law school on the record is Pepperdine University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1980 · 46 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Immigration.
49 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Burlingame, in San Mateo County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, seated at Redwood City.
Confirm Joseph John Siguenza’s license status, bar number #92327, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Immigration in San Mateo County: next on the roll
San Mateo County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records