Attorney RecordSan Diego County

Karen P. Hewitt, attorney at Jones Day in San Diego, California

Karen P. Hewitt · California Lawyer

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Karen P. Hewitt is on California’s State Bar roll, #145309, admitted in 1989; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Diego, San Diego County. 4 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. This profile lists one third-party recognition, in Chambers USA 2026, as published by Chambers and Partners. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#145309
License statusActive
Admitted1989
Law schoolUniv of San Diego
FirmJones Day
LocationSan Diego, San Diego County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Languages

Spanish · EspañolThis firm’s website is published in Spanish.
Chinese · 中文This firm’s website is published in Chinese.
Russian · РусскийThis firm’s website is published in Russian.
Japanese · 日本語This firm’s website is published in Japanese.
Portuguese · PortuguêsThis firm’s website is published in Portuguese.
French · FrançaisThis firm’s website is published in French.

These are signals observed from the firm's public website, not a statement by the attorney. Confirm language access directly with the office before retaining counsel. Language listings describe access, not ability or results. Browse attorneys by language →

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitejonesday.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Qualcomm Inc. v. Compal Elecs., Inc.Counsel for the plaintiff283 F. Supp. 3d 905U.S. District Court, Southern District of California7 September 2017
United States v. BagdasarianCounsel for the respondent652 F.3d 1113U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 July 2011
Myers v. United StatesCounsel for the respondent652 F.3d 1021U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit15 July 2011
United States v. Diaz-LopezCounsel for the respondent625 F.3d 1198U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit9 November 2010
United States v. Isaac RamosCounsel for the respondent623 F.3d 672U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 September 2010
United States v. LemusCounsel for the respondent582 F.3d 958U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 September 2009
United States v. Garcia-HernandezCounsel for the respondent569 F.3d 1100U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 June 2009
United States v. Medina-VillaCounsel for the respondent567 F.3d 507U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 May 2009
United States v. Juvenile FemaleCounsel for the respondent566 F.3d 943U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 May 2009
United States v. Heron-SalinasCounsel for the respondent566 F.3d 898U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 May 2009
United States v. IribeCounsel for the respondent564 F.3d 1155U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit6 May 2009
United States v. Godinez-OrtizCounsel for the respondent563 F.3d 1022U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit29 April 2009
United States v. LopezCounsel for the respondent306 F. App'x 370U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 December 2008
United States v. LopezCounsel for the respondent306 F. App'x 370U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 December 2008
United States v. Lugo-CuevasCounsel for the respondent304 F. App'x 477U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 December 2008
United States v. Lugo-CuevasCounsel for the respondent304 F. App'x 477U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 December 2008
United States v. Flores-VillarCounsel for the respondent536 F.3d 990U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit6 August 2008
Casas-Castrillon v. Department of Homeland SecurityCounsel for the respondent535 F.3d 942U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 July 2008
United States v. ChapmanCounsel for the respondent528 F.3d 1215U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 June 2008
United States v. CarutoCounsel for the respondent532 F.3d 822U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 June 2008
United States v. SantanaCounsel for the respondent526 F.3d 1257U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 May 2008
United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCounsel for the respondent523 F.3d 1071U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 April 2008
United States v. Reveles-EspinozaCounsel for the respondent522 F.3d 1044U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit15 April 2008
United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark FinsCounsel for the respondent520 F.3d 976U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 March 2008
United States v. GarroCounsel for the respondent517 F.3d 1163U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 February 2008
HASHI v. ChertoffCounsel for the respondent535 F. Supp. 2d 1125U.S. District Court, Southern District of California15 January 2008
United States v. PreciadoCounsel for the respondent506 F.3d 808U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 October 2007
Pinnavaia v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCounsel for the respondent218 F. App'x 646U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 January 2007
United States v. John G. ReynardCounsel for the respondent473 F.3d 1008U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit12 January 2007
Oosthuizen v. AshcroftCounsel for the respondent96 F. App'x 494U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit26 April 2004

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

Third-party recognitions

Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.

Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Jones Day.

Published source · Methodology

Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.

Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →

Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.

On the official record

Language information is listed below with its attorney, staff or website source.

The employer on the official record is Jones Day.

The law school on the record is University of San Diego School of Law.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1989 · 37 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Business Law, Criminal Defense, Health Care Law and Litigation.

30 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Diego, in San Diego County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, seated at San Diego.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Karen P. Hewitt’s license status, bar number #145309, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Business Law in San Diego County: next on the roll

San Diego County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records