Attorney RecordOrange County
Karyn H. Bucur · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Karyn H. Bucur is on California’s State Bar roll, #158608, admitted in 1992; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Laguna Hills, Orange County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law. Certified by the State Bar as a legal specialist in Appellate Law. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #158608 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1992 |
| Law school | Western State Univ COL |
| Firm | Karyn H. Bucur, Attorney at Law |
| Location | Laguna Hills, Orange County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Michael Lux | Counsel for the appellant | 611 F. App'x 464 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 August 2015 |
| United States v. Gregory Rush | Counsel for the appellant | 550 F. App'x 427 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 December 2013 |
| United States v. Pablo Yaxon-Sicajau | Counsel for the appellant | 535 F. App'x 600 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 August 2013 |
| United States v. Martin Frias | Counsel for the appellant | 503 F. App'x 547 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 January 2013 |
| United States v. Zachary Baca | Counsel for the appellant | 439 F. App'x 635 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 2011 |
| United States v. Roberto Lopez-Villegas | Counsel for the appellant | 413 F. App'x 992 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 February 2011 |
| United States v. Roberto Duran | Counsel for the appellant | 397 F. App'x 335 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 September 2010 |
| Quezada v. Scribner | Counsel for the appellant | 611 F.3d 1165 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 July 2010 |
| Harper v. Clark | Counsel for the appellant | 372 F. App'x 824 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 April 2010 |
| Baker v. Yates | Counsel for the appellant | 339 F. App'x 690 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 June 2009 |
| Baker v. Yates | Counsel for the appellant | 339 F. App'x 690 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 June 2009 |
| United States v. Goodman | Counsel for the appellant | 317 F. App'x 634 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 November 2008 |
| United States v. Goodman | Counsel for the appellant | 317 F. App'x 634 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 November 2008 |
| United States v. Smith | Counsel for the appellant | 294 F. App'x 301 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 September 2008 |
| Brown v. Attorney General of California | Counsel for the appellant | 292 F. App'x 674 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 September 2008 |
| United States v. Almashleh | Counsel for the appellant | 271 F. App'x 624 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 March 2008 |
| United States v. Ceja-Licea | Counsel for the appellant | 264 F. App'x 594 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 January 2008 |
| United States v. Ramsey | Counsel for the appellant | 252 F. App'x 813 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 October 2007 |
| United States v. Wilson | Counsel for the appellant | 249 F. App'x 660 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 October 2007 |
| United States v. Lewis | Counsel for the appellant | 234 F. App'x 757 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 July 2007 |
| United States v. Goodman | Counsel for the appellant | 229 F. App'x 493 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 April 2007 |
| United States v. Callahan | Counsel for the appellant | 218 F. App'x 575 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 January 2007 |
| United States v. Jacobs | Counsel for the appellant | 212 F. App'x 683 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 December 2006 |
| United States v. Crowe | Counsel for the appellant | 209 F. App'x 732 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 December 2006 |
| United States v. Sanchez | Counsel for the appellant | 209 F. App'x 662 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 December 2006 |
| Williams v. Giurbino | Counsel for the appellant | 205 F. App'x 494 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 November 2006 |
| United States v. Alexander | Counsel for the appellant | 203 F. App'x 151 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 October 2006 |
| Collins v. Rice | Counsel for the respondent | 451 F.3d 1092 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 July 2006 |
| Walton v. Carey | Counsel for the appellant | 181 F. App'x 632 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 May 2006 |
| Escobar v. Hill | Counsel for the appellant | 180 F. App'x 678 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 May 2006 |
| United States v. Whitney | Counsel for the appellant | 180 F. App'x 670 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 May 2006 |
| United States v. Marquez | Counsel for the appellant | 171 F. App'x 31 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 March 2006 |
| United States v. Fernandez | Counsel for the appellant | 425 F.3d 1248 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 October 2005 |
| United States v. Almashleh | Counsel for the appellant | 144 F. App'x 663 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 September 2005 |
| United States v. Bogard | Counsel for the appellant | 143 F. App'x 48 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 August 2005 |
| United States v. Coupar | Counsel for the appellant | 140 F. App'x 665 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 July 2005 |
| McVay v. Roe | Counsel for the appellant | 130 F. App'x 158 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 May 2005 |
| Walton v. Carey | Counsel for the appellant | 130 F. App'x 120 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 April 2005 |
| McCarthy v. Hall | Counsel for the appellant | 116 F. App'x 898 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 November 2004 |
| Murphy v. Butler | Counsel for the appellant | 113 F. App'x 825 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 November 2004 |
| United States v. Fernandez | Counsel for the appellant | 388 F.3d 1199 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 October 2004 |
| John Gary Arredondo v. George Ortiz | Counsel for the appellant | 365 F.3d 778 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2004 |
| Steven Martell Collins v. Bertram Rice Attorney General of the State of California | Counsel for the appellant | 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9673 | California Supreme Court | 7 November 2003 |
| Steven Martell Collins v. Bertram Rice Attorney General of the State of California | Counsel for the appellant | 348 F.3d 1082 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 November 2003 |
| Rene Joseph Delhomme v. Ana M. Ramirez, Warden | Counsel for the appellant | 340 F.3d 817 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 August 2003 |
| Rene Joseph Delhomme v. Ana M. Ramirez, Warden | Counsel for the appellant | 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7361 | California Supreme Court | 15 August 2003 |
| James Nelson Blair v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden | Counsel for the appellant | 319 F.3d 1087 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 January 2003 |
| James Nelson Blair v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden | Counsel for the appellant | 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 975 | California Supreme Court | 31 January 2003 |
| United States v. Denis Dorais, United States of America v. Laurie Gomes | Counsel for the appellant | 241 F.3d 1124 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 March 2001 |
| United States v. Denis Dorais, United States of America v. Laurie Gomes | Counsel for the appellant | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1692 | California Supreme Court | 1 March 2001 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Certified specialties
Appellate Law
Certified by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
On the official record
The State Bar of California has certified this attorney as a legal specialist in Appellate Law · a certification held by roughly one California attorney in sixty, and separate from any rating.
The employer on the official record is Karyn H. Bucur, Attorney at Law.
The law school on the record is Western State University College of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1992 · 34 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Laguna Hills, in Orange County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, seated at Santa Ana.
Confirm Karyn H. Bucur’s license status, bar number #158608, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Orange County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records