Attorney RecordFresno County
Kathleen A. Servatius · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Kathleen A. Servatius is on California’s State Bar roll, #131132, admitted in 1987; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Fresno, Fresno County. 48 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate Distric. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #131132 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1987 |
| Law school | UC Davis SOL King Hall |
| Firm | Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate Distric |
| Location | Fresno, Fresno County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Rafael Quiroz | Counsel for the respondent | 706 F. App'x 423 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 December 2017 |
| United States v. Humberto Delgado | Counsel for the respondent | 702 F. App'x 626 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 November 2017 |
| United States v. Raul Mercado-Moreno | Counsel for the respondent | 869 F.3d 942 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 August 2017 |
| United States v. Jesus Lopez | Counsel for the appellant | 670 F. App'x 454 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 November 2016 |
| United States v. Chavez | Counsel for the respondent | 624 F. App'x 587 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 December 2015 |
| United States v. Oswaldo Ibarra-Meza | Counsel for the respondent | 620 F. App'x 600 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 October 2015 |
| United States v. Oscar Serrano | Counsel for the respondent | 615 F. App'x 467 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 September 2015 |
| United States v. John Doe | Counsel for the respondent | 778 F.3d 814 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 February 2015 |
| United States v. Jose Partida-Vargas | Counsel for the respondent | 531 F. App'x 815 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 June 2013 |
| United States v. Huff | Counsel for the respondent | 519 F. App'x 451 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 2013 |
| United States v. John Doe | Counsel for the plaintiff | 705 F.3d 1134 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 January 2013 |
| United States v. Efrain Soto | Counsel for the respondent | 496 F. App'x 708 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 October 2012 |
| United States v. Sandeep Singh | Counsel for the respondent | 473 F. App'x 593 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 May 2012 |
| United States v. Steven Harrill | Counsel for the respondent | 436 F. App'x 770 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 June 2011 |
| United States v. Montes | Counsel for the respondent | 628 F.3d 1183 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 January 2011 |
| United States v. Montes | Counsel for the respondent | 628 F.3d 1183 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 January 2011 |
| United States v. Barragan | Counsel for the respondent | 333 F. App'x 319 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 October 2009 |
| United States v. Barragan | Counsel for the respondent | 333 F. App'x 319 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 October 2009 |
| United States v. Hinojosa | Counsel for the respondent | 329 F. App'x 750 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 July 2009 |
| United States v. Hinojosa | Counsel for the respondent | 329 F. App'x 750 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 July 2009 |
| United States v. Noriega-Valenzuela | Counsel for the respondent | 317 F. App'x 655 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 March 2009 |
| United States v. Noriega-Valenzuela | Counsel for the respondent | 317 F. App'x 655 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 March 2009 |
| United States v. Rosales | Counsel for the respondent | 308 F. App'x 209 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 January 2009 |
| United States v. Rosales | Counsel for the respondent | 308 F. App'x 209 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 January 2009 |
| United States v. Soto-Hinojosa | Counsel for the respondent | 305 F. App'x 472 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 December 2008 |
| United States v. Soto-Hinojosa | Counsel for the respondent | 305 F. App'x 472 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 December 2008 |
| United States v. Howard | Counsel for the respondent | 278 F. App'x 777 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 May 2008 |
| United States v. Scarmazzo | Counsel for the plaintiff | 554 F. Supp. 2d 1102 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 1 May 2008 |
| United States v. Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 228 F. App'x 645 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2007 |
| United States v. Julio Cesar Ruiz, United States of America v. Angel Eliazar Noriega-Valenzuela | Counsel for the respondent | 462 F.3d 1082 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 August 2006 |
| United States v. Lopez | Counsel for the respondent | 193 F. App'x 708 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 July 2006 |
| United States v. Magana | Counsel for the respondent | 105 F. App'x 918 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 July 2004 |
| United States v. Aguilar-Espinoza | Counsel for the respondent | 95 F. App'x 233 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 April 2004 |
| United States v. Zepeda-Medrano | Counsel for the respondent | 84 F. App'x 913 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 December 2003 |
| United States v. Lorena Chavez, Claimant-Appellant, Rafael Quiroz | Counsel for the respondent | 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2719 | California Supreme Court | 28 March 2003 |
| United States v. Lorena Chavez, Claimant-Appellant, Rafael Quiroz | Counsel for the respondent | 323 F.3d 1216 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 March 2003 |
| United States v. Way Quoe Long | Counsel for the respondent | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7793 | California Supreme Court | 26 August 2002 |
| United States v. Way Quoe Long | Counsel for the respondent | 301 F.3d 1095 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 August 2002 |
| United States v. Gerardo Herrera-Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7830 | California Supreme Court | 5 September 2001 |
| United States v. Gerardo Herrera-Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 263 F.3d 1092 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 September 2001 |
| United States v. Mario Silva, Jorge Zepeda-Medrano, and Alejandro Aguilar-Espinoza | Counsel for the respondent | 247 F.3d 1051 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2001 |
| United States v. Mario Silva, Jorge Zepeda-Medrano, and Alejandro Aguilar-Espinoza | Counsel for the respondent | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3134 | California Supreme Court | 20 April 2001 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto CORRAL, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 172 F.3d 714 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 April 1999 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto CORRAL, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2573 | California Supreme Court | 8 April 1999 |
| United States v. John Frederick Beasley | Counsel for the respondent | 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5457 | California Supreme Court | 24 July 1996 |
| United States v. John Frederick Beasley | Counsel for the respondent | 90 F.3d 400 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 July 1996 |
| United States v. Abelardo Elenes Gastelum | Counsel for the respondent | 16 F.3d 996 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 February 1994 |
| United States v. Abelardo Elenes Gastelum | Counsel for the respondent | 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 996 | California Supreme Court | 9 February 1994 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate Distric.
The law school on the record is UC Davis School of Law King Hall.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1987 · 39 years on the roll.
48 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Fresno, in Fresno County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Fresno, seated at Fresno.
Confirm Kathleen A. Servatius’s license status, bar number #131132, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Fresno County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records