Attorney RecordSanta Clara County

Keith E. Eggleton · California Lawyer

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Keith E. Eggleton is on California’s State Bar roll, #159842, admitted in 1992; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Palo Alto, Santa Clara County. 19 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Wilson Sonsini et al. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#159842
License statusActive
Admitted1992
Law schoolNorthwestern Univ SOL
FirmWilson Sonsini et al
LocationPalo Alto, Santa Clara County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitewsgr.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
McGovney v. Aerohive Networks, Inc.Counsel for the defendant367 F. Supp. 3d 1038U.S. District Court, Northern District of California5 February 2019
Union Asset Management Holding AG v. Sandisk LLCCounsel for the defendant227 F. Supp. 3d 1098U.S. District Court, Northern District of California4 January 2017
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. Netflix, Inc.Counsel for the respondent647 F. App'x 813U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11 April 2016
Meghan Mollett v. Netflix, Inc.Counsel for the respondent795 F.3d 1062U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit31 July 2015
Nathanson v. Polycom, Inc.Counsel for the defendant87 F. Supp. 3d 966U.S. District Court, Northern District of California3 April 2015
Andrea Resnick v. Netflix, Inc.Counsel for the appellant779 F.3d 914U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 February 2015
In re Polycom, Inc.Counsel for the defendant78 F. Supp. 3d 1006U.S. District Court, Northern District of California13 January 2015
Athena Hohenberg v. Ferrero USACounsel for the respondent583 F. App'x 665U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 July 2014
Public Employees' Retirement System v. Moody's Investors Service, Inc.Counsel for the appellant226 Cal. App. 4th 643California Court of Appeal27 May 2014
Ronald Grassi v. Moody's Investors ServicesCounsel for the respondent540 F. App'x 737U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1 October 2013
In re Netflix, Inc.Counsel for the defendant923 F. Supp. 2d 1214U.S. District Court, Northern District of California13 February 2013
In re Ferrero LitigationCounsel for the defendant278 F.R.D. 552U.S. District Court, Southern District of California15 November 2011
Phillips v. Lithia Motors, Inc.Counsel for the appellant319 F. App'x 646U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 March 2009
Phillips v. Lithia Motors, Inc.Counsel for the appellant319 F. App'x 646U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 March 2009
Public Employees' Retirement System v. StanleyCounsel for the defendant605 F. Supp. 2d 1073U.S. District Court, Central District of California6 March 2009
Kiefer v. Lithia Motors, Inc.Counsel for the respondent280 F. App'x 606U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 May 2008
Chavez v. Netflix, Inc.Counsel for the respondent162 Cal. App. 4th 43California Court of Appeal21 April 2008
In Re Netflix Antitrust LitigationCounsel for the defendant506 F. Supp. 2d 308U.S. District Court, Northern District of California14 June 2007
In Re ZZZZ Best Securities LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff864 F. Supp. 960U.S. District Court, Central District of California12 August 1994

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Wilson Sonsini et al.

The law school on the record is Northwestern University School of Law.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1992 · 34 years on the roll.

19 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in Palo Alto, in Santa Clara County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, seated at San Jose.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Keith E. Eggleton’s license status, bar number #159842, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Santa Clara County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records