Attorney RecordIntellectual Property · San Francisco County
Kelly M. Klaus · Intellectual Property Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Kelly M. Klaus is on California’s State Bar roll, #161091, admitted in 1992; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Entertainment and Sports Law and Intellectual Property. 35 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 8 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a intellectual property matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 8 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #161091 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1992 |
| Law school | Stanford Univ Law School |
| Firm | Munger Tolles & Olson LLP |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disney Enters., Inc. v. Vidangel, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 371 F. Supp. 3d 708 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 6 March 2019 |
| Disney Enters., Inc. v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC | Counsel for the plaintiff | 336 F. Supp. 3d 1146 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 August 2018 |
| De Havilland v. FX Networks, LLC | Counsel for the appellant | 21 Cal. App. 5th 845 | California Court of Appeal | 26 March 2018 |
| Rearden LLC v. Walt Disney Co. | Counsel for the defendant | 293 F. Supp. 3d 963 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 21 February 2018 |
| Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Vidangel, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 869 F.3d 848 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 August 2017 |
| Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 224 F. Supp. 3d 957 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 12 December 2016 |
| Sisyphus Touring, Inc. v. TMZ Productions, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 208 F. Supp. 3d 1105 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 23 September 2016 |
| Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 815 F.3d 1145 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 March 2016 |
| O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n | Counsel for the appellant | 802 F.3d 1049 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2015 |
| Marya v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 131 F. Supp. 3d 975 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 22 September 2015 |
| Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 801 F.3d 1126 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 September 2015 |
| O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n | Counsel for the defendant | 114 F. Supp. 3d 819 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 13 July 2015 |
| Wilson v. Walt Disney Co. | Counsel for the defendant | 123 F. Supp. 3d 1172 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 April 2015 |
| O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n | Counsel for the defendant | 7 F. Supp. 3d 955 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 8 August 2014 |
| Davis v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 570 F. App'x 652 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 April 2014 |
| Luvdarts, LLC v. AT & T Mobility, LLC | Counsel for the respondent | 710 F.3d 1068 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 March 2013 |
| Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 897 F. Supp. 2d 939 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 21 September 2012 |
| Rock River Communications, Inc. v. Universal Music Group | Counsel for the defendant | 276 F.R.D. 633 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 31 August 2011 |
| F.B.T. Productions, LLC v. Aftermath Records | Counsel for the respondent | 621 F.3d 958 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 September 2010 |
| Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 616 F.3d 904 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 July 2010 |
| Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 697 F. Supp. 2d 1139 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 8 March 2010 |
| Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. King Mountain Tobacco Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 569 F.3d 932 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 June 2009 |
| Realnetworks, Inc. v. DVD Copy Control Ass'n | Counsel for the defendant | 264 F.R.D. 517 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 5 May 2009 |
| Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 609 F. Supp. 2d 951 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 23 February 2009 |
| Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. King Mountain Tobacco Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 552 F.3d 1098 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 January 2009 |
| Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 572 F. Supp. 2d 1150 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 20 August 2008 |
| In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright Litigation | Counsel for the respondent | 479 F.3d 1078 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 March 2007 |
| Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 441 F. Supp. 2d 1066 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 July 2006 |
| UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Hummer Winblad Venture Partners | Counsel for the plaintiff | 235 F.R.D. 463 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 20 April 2006 |
| Fuller-Austin Insulation Co. v. Highlands Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 135 Cal. App. 4th 958 | California Court of Appeal | 19 January 2006 |
| Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 591 F. Supp. 2d 1038 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 5 January 2006 |
| UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Hummer Winblad Venture Partners | Counsel for the plaintiff | 377 F. Supp. 2d 796 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 31 May 2005 |
| UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Hummer Winblad Venture Partners | Counsel for the plaintiff | 354 F. Supp. 2d 1113 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 3 February 2005 |
| UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Bertelsmann AG | Counsel for the plaintiff | 222 F.R.D. 408 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 July 2004 |
| Southern California Edison Co. v. Peevey | Counsel for the respondent | 31 Cal. 4th 781 | California Supreme Court | 21 August 2003 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers Global 2026, Band 3, Intellectual Property: Trademark & Copyright (USA). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 6 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 3, Intellectual Property: Trademark & Copyright (USA - Nationwide). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright & Trade Secrets (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Media & Entertainment: Litigation (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Munger Tolles & Olson LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at mto.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Stanford University Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1992 · 34 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Entertainment and Sports Law and Intellectual Property.
35 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Kelly M. Klaus’s license status, bar number #161091, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Intellectual Property in San Francisco County: next on the roll
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records