Attorney RecordLitigation · Los Angeles County
Kenneth R. Pedroza · Litigation Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Kenneth R. Pedroza is on California’s State Bar roll, #184906, admitted in 1996; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Marino, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law and Litigation. Certified by the State Bar as a legal specialist in Appellate Law. Registry record updated 25 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a litigation matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 25 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #184906 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1996 |
| Law school | Univ of Arizona |
| Firm | Cole Pedroza LLP |
| Location | San Marino, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stokes v. Baker | Counsel for the respondent | 35 Cal. App. 5th 946 | California Court of Appeal | 30 May 2019 |
| Doe v. Allee | Counsel for the respondent | 30 Cal. App. 5th 1036 | California Court of Appeal | 4 January 2019 |
| Doe v. Univ. of S. Cal. | Counsel for the appellant | 28 Cal. App. 5th 26 | California Court of Appeal | 19 September 2018 |
| Jameson v. Desta | Counsel for the respondent | 5 Cal. 5th 594 | California Supreme Court | 5 July 2018 |
| Alexander v. Scripps Mem'l Hosp. La Jolla | Counsel for the respondent | 23 Cal. App. 5th 206 | California Court of Appeal | 16 April 2018 |
| Powell v. Bear Valley Cmty. Hosp. | Counsel for the respondent | 22 Cal. App. 5th 263 | California Court of Appeal | 26 March 2018 |
| Julian v. Mission Community Hospital | Counsel for the respondent | 11 Cal. App. 5th 360 | California Court of Appeal | 2 May 2017 |
| Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 7 Cal. App. 5th 276 | California Court of Appeal | 6 January 2017 |
| Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 4 Cal. App. 5th 1031 | California Court of Appeal | 28 October 2016 |
| Markow v. Rosner | Counsel for the appellant | 3 Cal. App. 5th 1027 | California Court of Appeal | 4 October 2016 |
| Winn v. Pioneer Medical Group, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 63 Cal. 4th 148 | California Supreme Court | 19 May 2016 |
| Espejo v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group | Counsel for the appellant | 246 Cal. App. 4th 1047 | California Court of Appeal | 22 April 2016 |
| Chan v. Curran | Counsel for the respondent | 237 Cal. App. 4th 601 | California Court of Appeal | 9 June 2015 |
| Rashidi v. Moser | Counsel for the appellant | 60 Cal. 4th 718 | California Supreme Court | 15 December 2014 |
| Snibbe v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 224 Cal. App. 4th 184 | California Court of Appeal | 27 February 2014 |
| Montoya v. Barragan | Counsel for the appellant | 220 Cal. App. 4th 1215 | California Court of Appeal | 29 October 2013 |
| Goldman v. Sunbridge Healthcare, LLC | Counsel for the appellant | 220 Cal. App. 4th 1160 | California Court of Appeal | 27 September 2013 |
| Robert Perez v. Nidek Co., Ltd. | Counsel for the respondent | 711 F.3d 1109 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 March 2013 |
| Yun Hee So v. Sook Ja Shin | Counsel for the respondent | 212 Cal. App. 4th 652 | California Court of Appeal | 3 January 2013 |
| Santillan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Fresno | Counsel for the appellant | 202 Cal. App. 4th 708 | California Court of Appeal | 6 January 2012 |
| Johnson v. Chiu | Counsel for the respondent | 199 Cal. App. 4th 775 | California Court of Appeal | 29 September 2011 |
| Shugart v. Regents of University of California | Counsel for the respondent | 199 Cal. App. 4th 499 | California Court of Appeal | 9 September 2011 |
| Stinnett v. Tam | Counsel for the respondent | 198 Cal. App. 4th 1412 | California Court of Appeal | 1 September 2011 |
| Center v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 194 Cal. App. 4th 288 | California Court of Appeal | 13 April 2011 |
| Burton v. Cruise | Counsel for the respondent | 190 Cal. App. 4th 939 | California Court of Appeal | 8 December 2010 |
| Villano v. Waterman Convalescent Hospital, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 181 Cal. App. 4th 1189 | California Court of Appeal | 5 February 2010 |
| Muller v. Fresno Community Hospital & Medical Center | Counsel for the appellant | 172 Cal. App. 4th 887 | California Court of Appeal | 27 March 2009 |
| Freedman v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 166 Cal. App. 4th 198 | California Court of Appeal | 22 August 2008 |
| North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 44 Cal. 4th 1145 | California Supreme Court | 18 August 2008 |
| Ayala v. ARROYO VISTA FAMILY HEALTH CENTER | Counsel for the respondent | 160 Cal. App. 4th 1350 | California Court of Appeal | 14 March 2008 |
| Saxena v. Goffney | Counsel for the appellant | 159 Cal. App. 4th 316 | California Court of Appeal | 24 January 2008 |
| Barragan v. Lopez | Counsel for the respondent | 156 Cal. App. 4th 997 | California Court of Appeal | 8 November 2007 |
| Mayes v. Bryan | Counsel for the appellant | 139 Cal. App. 4th 1075 | California Court of Appeal | 25 April 2006 |
| Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 114 Cal. App. 4th 1108 | California Court of Appeal | 11 December 2003 |
| TrafficSchoolOnline, Inc. v. Clarke | Counsel for the respondent | 112 Cal. App. 4th 736 | California Court of Appeal | 14 October 2003 |
| Deocampo v. Ahn | Counsel for the appellant | 101 Cal. App. 4th 758 | California Court of Appeal | 30 September 2002 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Certified specialties
Appellate Law
Certified by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
On the official record
The State Bar of California has certified this attorney as a legal specialist in Appellate Law · a certification held by roughly one California attorney in sixty, and separate from any rating.
The employer on the official record is Cole Pedroza LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at colepedroza.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is University of Arizona.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1996 · 30 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law and Litigation.
36 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Marino, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Kenneth R. Pedroza’s license status, bar number #184906, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Litigation in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records