Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Kenneth T. Roost · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Kenneth T. Roost is on California’s State Bar roll, #231444, admitted in 2004; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Agriculture Law. 33 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Presidio Farms. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #231444 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 2004 |
| Law school | Univ of California at Los Angeles |
| Firm | Presidio Farms |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing in San Francisco County
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curry v. California Department of Corrections | Counsel for the respondent | 616 F. App'x 265 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 September 2015 |
| Edwards v. High Desert State Prison | Counsel for the respondent | 615 F. App'x 457 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 September 2015 |
| Dale Stein v. G. Woods | Counsel for the respondent | 592 F. App'x 582 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 February 2015 |
| Gonzales v. California Department of Corrections | Counsel for the respondent | 739 F.3d 1226 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 January 2014 |
| Daniel Dixon v. J. O'Connor | Counsel for the respondent | 542 F. App'x 561 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 October 2013 |
| Lawrence Hash v. C. Williams | Counsel for the respondent | 542 F. App'x 554 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 October 2013 |
| Lawrence Cyprian v. Derrick Givens | Counsel for the defendant | 540 F. App'x 817 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 October 2013 |
| David Ruff v. D. Vanleer | Counsel for the defendant | 540 F. App'x 819 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 October 2013 |
| Charles Reece v. D. Sisto | Counsel for the defendant | 536 F. App'x 705 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 August 2013 |
| Russell Sims v. Campbell | Counsel for the defendant | 531 F. App'x 816 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 June 2013 |
| Rodney Womack v. C. Bakewell | Counsel for the respondent | 509 F. App'x 627 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 February 2013 |
| Fred Gilbert v. Claude Finn | Counsel for the defendant | 489 F. App'x 184 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 November 2012 |
| Javance Wilson v. A. Panizza | Counsel for the defendant | 498 F. App'x 722 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 November 2012 |
| Daniel Wright v. Dorothy Swingle | Counsel for the respondent | 482 F. App'x 294 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 September 2012 |
| Edward Gray, II v. D. Robinson | Counsel for the respondent | 481 F. App'x 380 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 September 2012 |
| Ernesto Centeno v. David Wilson | Counsel for the defendant | 479 F. App'x 101 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 July 2012 |
| Donald Glass v. A. Scribner | Counsel for the defendant | 474 F. App'x 659 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 July 2012 |
| Mario Estrada v. Robert Horel | Counsel for the defendant | 474 F. App'x 580 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 2012 |
| De'arcey Stewart v. M. Evans | Counsel for the respondent | 472 F. App'x 751 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 April 2012 |
| Dale Hurd v. Silvia Garcia | Counsel for the respondent | 471 F. App'x 798 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 March 2012 |
| Darryl Hubbard v. C. Houghland | Counsel for the respondent | 471 F. App'x 625 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 March 2012 |
| Salvador Solis v. McKessen | Counsel for the defendant | 465 F. App'x 709 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 January 2012 |
| Clarence Howard v. J. Nunley | Counsel for the respondent | 465 F. App'x 669 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 January 2012 |
| Vernon McNeal v. Ervin | Counsel for the defendant | 460 F. App'x 621 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 November 2011 |
| Sy Castle v. M. Knowles | Counsel for the defendant | 442 F. App'x 263 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 July 2011 |
| Quillie Harvey, Jr. v. Arnold Schwarzenegger | Counsel for the respondent | 418 F. App'x 639 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 March 2011 |
| Harold Shamburger v. R. Kirkland | Counsel for the respondent | 404 F. App'x 228 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 November 2010 |
| Castle v. Parkinsons | Counsel for the respondent | 372 F. App'x 768 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 March 2010 |
| Ruiz v. Sotelo | Counsel for the respondent | 338 F. App'x 665 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 July 2009 |
| Ruiz v. Sotelo | Counsel for the respondent | 338 F. App'x 665 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 July 2009 |
| Candler v. Evans | Counsel for the respondent | 337 F. App'x 684 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 July 2009 |
| Candler v. Evans | Counsel for the respondent | 337 F. App'x 684 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 July 2009 |
| Van Smith v. Franklin | Counsel for the defendant | 286 F. App'x 373 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 July 2008 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Presidio Farms.
A firm or employer website answers at presidiofarms.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UCLA School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 2004 · 22 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Agriculture Law.
33 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Kenneth T. Roost’s license status, bar number #231444, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records