Attorney RecordBankruptcy · Los Angeles County
Kent Lewis Richland · Bankruptcy Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Kent Lewis Richland is on California’s State Bar roll, #51413, admitted in 1972; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law and Bankruptcy. This profile lists one third-party recognition, in Chambers USA 2026, as published by Chambers and Partners. Registry record updated 8 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a bankruptcy matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 8 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
Your profile was viewed 2 times this month. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #51413 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1972 |
| Law school | Univ of California at Los Angeles |
| Firm | Greines Martin et al LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 6 Cal. 5th 59 | California Supreme Court | 30 August 2018 |
| Colyear v. Rolling Hills Community Ass'n of Rancho Palos Verdes | Counsel for the appellant | 9 Cal. App. 5th 119 | California Court of Appeal | 28 February 2017 |
| In re Transient Occupancy Tax Cases | Counsel for the appellant | 2 Cal. 5th 131 | California Supreme Court | 12 December 2016 |
| Horiike v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 1 Cal. 5th 1024 | California Supreme Court | 21 November 2016 |
| Baxter v. Bock CA1/1 | Counsel for the appellant | 247 Cal. App. 4th 775 | California Court of Appeal | 18 May 2016 |
| Kennedy v. Kennedy | Counsel for the appellant | 235 Cal. App. 4th 1474 | California Court of Appeal | 20 April 2015 |
| Crosby v. HLC Properties, Ltd. | Counsel for the appellant | 223 Cal. App. 4th 597 | California Court of Appeal | 29 January 2014 |
| In re Glass | Counsel for the petitioner | 58 Cal. 4th 500 | California Supreme Court | 27 January 2014 |
| Aguilar v. Goldstein | Counsel for the respondent | 207 Cal. App. 4th 1152 | California Court of Appeal | 19 July 2012 |
| Behr v. Redmond | Counsel for the appellant | 193 Cal. App. 4th 517 | California Court of Appeal | 2 March 2011 |
| Moore v. Kaufman | Counsel for the respondent | 189 Cal. App. 4th 604 | California Court of Appeal | 22 October 2010 |
| Marshall v. Stern | Counsel for the appellant | 600 F.3d 1037 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 March 2010 |
| Blanks v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP | Counsel for the appellant | 171 Cal. App. 4th 336 | California Court of Appeal | 20 February 2009 |
| Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 529 F.3d 892 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 June 2008 |
| Perrillo v. Picco & Presley | Counsel for the appellant | 157 Cal. App. 4th 914 | California Court of Appeal | 6 December 2007 |
| Chosak v. Alameda County Medical Center | Counsel for the respondent | 153 Cal. App. 4th 549 | California Court of Appeal | 27 July 2007 |
| FREMONT INDEMNITY COMPANY v. Fremont General Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 143 Cal. App. 4th 50 | California Court of Appeal | 20 September 2006 |
| Bosworth v. Whitmore | Counsel for the respondent | 135 Cal. App. 4th 536 | California Court of Appeal | 6 January 2006 |
| Eddins v. Redstone | Counsel for the appellant | 134 Cal. App. 4th 290 | California Court of Appeal | 22 November 2005 |
| Marshall v. Marshall (In re Marshall) | Counsel for the appellant | 392 F.3d 1118 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 December 2004 |
| Burch v. Children's Hospital of Orange County Thrift Stores, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 109 Cal. App. 4th 537 | California Court of Appeal | 6 June 2003 |
| Saakyan v. Modern Auto, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 103 Cal. App. 4th 383 | California Court of Appeal | 31 October 2002 |
| Day v. City of Fontana | Counsel for the respondent | 25 Cal. 4th 268 | California Supreme Court | 5 April 2001 |
| Shaw v. Hughes Aircraft Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 83 Cal. App. 4th 1336 | California Court of Appeal | 19 October 2000 |
| GAB Business Services, Inc. v. Lindsey & Newsom Claim Services, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 83 Cal. App. 4th 409 | California Court of Appeal | 26 September 2000 |
| Cruz v. Homebase | Counsel for the appellant | 83 Cal. App. 4th 160 | California Court of Appeal | 19 September 2000 |
| Holt v. Regents of University of California | Counsel for the appellant | 73 Cal. App. 4th 871 | California Court of Appeal | 23 July 1999 |
| Sipple v. Foundation for National Progress | Counsel for the appellant | 71 Cal. App. 4th 226 | California Court of Appeal | 7 April 1999 |
| Salgado v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 19 Cal. 4th 629 | California Supreme Court | 17 February 1999 |
| Batchelder v. Kawamoto | Counsel for the respondent | 147 F.3d 915 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 July 1998 |
| Regency Health Services, Inc. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 64 Cal. App. 4th 1496 | California Court of Appeal | 24 June 1998 |
| Gawara v. United States Brass Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 63 Cal. App. 4th 1341 | California Court of Appeal | 17 April 1998 |
| Melendez v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 63 Cal. App. 4th 1 | California Court of Appeal | 14 April 1998 |
| Yeap v. Leake | Counsel for the respondent | 60 Cal. App. 4th 591 | California Court of Appeal | 30 December 1997 |
| Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 52 Cal. App. 4th 820 | California Court of Appeal | 7 February 1997 |
| Children's Hospital v. Sedgwick | Counsel for the appellant | 45 Cal. App. 4th 1780 | California Court of Appeal | 3 June 1996 |
| Roddenberry v. Roddenberry | Counsel for the appellant | 44 Cal. App. 4th 634 | California Court of Appeal | 16 April 1996 |
| Bishop v. Hyundai Motor America | Counsel for the appellant | 44 Cal. App. 4th 750 | California Court of Appeal | 27 March 1996 |
| Mai Chi Nguyen v. Los Angeles County Harbor | Counsel for the respondent | 40 Cal. App. 4th 1433 | California Court of Appeal | 11 December 1995 |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bank of America NT&SA | Counsel for the appellant | 32 Cal. App. 4th 424 | California Court of Appeal | 16 February 1995 |
| Haycock v. Hughes Aircraft Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 22 Cal. App. 4th 1473 | California Court of Appeal | 27 January 1994 |
| Bihun v. AT & T Information Systems, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 13 Cal. App. 4th 976 | California Court of Appeal | 24 February 1993 |
| Jacoves v. United Merchandising Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 9 Cal. App. 4th 88 | California Court of Appeal | 31 August 1992 |
| Mai Chi Nguyen v. Los Angeles County Harbor/UCLA Medical Center | Counsel for the respondent | 8 Cal. App. 4th 729 | California Court of Appeal | 3 August 1992 |
| Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 3 Cal. 4th 181 | California Supreme Court | 31 July 1992 |
| Lubetzky v. State Bar | Counsel for the petitioner | 54 Cal. 3d 308 | California Supreme Court | 30 August 1991 |
| George R. Chamberlain, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Allstate Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee | Counsel for the appellant | 931 F.2d 1361 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 July 1991 |
| County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 224 Cal. App. 3d 1446 | California Court of Appeal | 5 November 1990 |
| Atkins v. Strayhorn | Counsel for the appellant | 223 Cal. App. 3d 1380 | California Court of Appeal | 19 September 1990 |
| Holliday v. Jones | Counsel for the appellant | 215 Cal. App. 3d 102 | California Court of Appeal | 28 September 1989 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Senior Statespeople, Litigation: Appellate (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Greines Martin et al LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at gmsr.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UCLA School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1972 · 54 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law and Bankruptcy.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Kent Lewis Richland’s license status, bar number #51413, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Bankruptcy in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records