Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Kevin Murray Fong · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Kevin Murray Fong is on California’s State Bar roll, #91037, admitted in 1979; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 49 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #91037 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1979 |
| Law school | Harvard Univ Law School |
| Firm | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing in San Francisco County
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Long Beach v. City of L. A. | Counsel for the respondent | 19 Cal. App. 5th 465 | California Court of Appeal | 12 January 2018 |
| Joseph Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. | Counsel for the appellant | 830 F.3d 975 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 July 2016 |
| Whittaker Corporation v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 825 F.3d 1002 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 June 2016 |
| Mwangi v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Mwangi) | Counsel for the respondent | 585 F. App'x 939 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 October 2014 |
| Mwangi v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Mwangi) | Counsel for the respondent | 764 F.3d 1168 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 August 2014 |
| Center for Community Action & Environmental Justice v. BNSF Railway Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 764 F.3d 1019 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 August 2014 |
| Joseph Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. | Counsel for the appellant | 563 F. App'x 526 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 February 2014 |
| Eden Township Healthcare District v. Eden Medical Center | Counsel for the respondent | 220 Cal. App. 4th 418 | California Court of Appeal | 9 October 2013 |
| Joseph Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. | Counsel for the appellant | 540 F. App'x 615 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 September 2013 |
| American Nurses Ass'n v. Torlakson | Counsel for the respondent | 57 Cal. 4th 570 | California Supreme Court | 12 August 2013 |
| Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Thurston County Board of Equalization | Counsel for the appellant | 724 F.3d 1153 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 July 2013 |
| Landstar Global Logistics, Inc. v. Robinson & Robinson, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 216 Cal. App. 4th 378 | California Court of Appeal | 16 May 2013 |
| Petzschke v. Century Aluminum Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 729 F.3d 1104 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 January 2013 |
| Eric Petzschke v. Century Aluminum Company | Counsel for the respondent | 704 F.3d 1119 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 January 2013 |
| Citizens for East Shore Parks v. State Lands Commission | Counsel for the respondent | 202 Cal. App. 4th 549 | California Court of Appeal | 30 December 2011 |
| Hepting v. AT & T Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 671 F.3d 881 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 December 2011 |
| McMurray v. Verizon Communications, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 669 F.3d 928 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 December 2011 |
| Eden Township Healthcare District v. Sutter Health | Counsel for the appellant | 202 Cal. App. 4th 208 | California Court of Appeal | 21 December 2011 |
| Ponderosa Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission | Counsel for the petitioner | 197 Cal. App. 4th 48 | California Court of Appeal | 5 July 2011 |
| Joseph Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. | Counsel for the respondent | 646 F.3d 1214 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 June 2011 |
| Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility District | Counsel for the respondent | 392 F. App'x 573 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 August 2010 |
| Communities for a Better Environment v. City of Richmond | Counsel for the appellant | 184 Cal. App. 4th 70 | California Court of Appeal | 26 April 2010 |
| Rubke v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd. | Counsel for the respondent | 551 F.3d 1156 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 January 2009 |
| Hepting v. AT & T Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 539 F.3d 1157 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 August 2008 |
| sdv/acci, Inc. v. at & T Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 522 F.3d 955 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 April 2008 |
| Hepting v. AT & T Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 508 F.3d 898 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 November 2007 |
| Engine Manufacturers Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District, (SCAQMD) | Counsel for the appellant | 498 F.3d 1031 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 August 2007 |
| Preservation Action Council v. City of San Jose | Counsel for the appellant | 141 Cal. App. 4th 1336 | California Court of Appeal | 4 August 2006 |
| Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. | Counsel for the appellant | 452 F.3d 1066 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 July 2006 |
| Ajaxo Inc. v. E Trade Group, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 135 Cal. App. 4th 21 | California Court of Appeal | 21 December 2005 |
| RLH Industries, Inc. v. SBC Communications, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 133 Cal. App. 4th 1277 | California Court of Appeal | 3 November 2005 |
| Apple Computer, Inc. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 126 Cal. App. 4th 1253 | California Court of Appeal | 17 February 2005 |
| Sporn v. Home Depot USA, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 126 Cal. App. 4th 1294 | California Court of Appeal | 17 February 2005 |
| Nevada Bell v. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 395 F.3d 1114 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 January 2005 |
| Gupta v. Stanford University | Counsel for the respondent | 124 Cal. App. 4th 407 | California Court of Appeal | 29 October 2004 |
| People Ex Rel. Orloff v. Pacific Bell | Counsel for the respondent | 31 Cal. 4th 1132 | California Supreme Court | 15 December 2003 |
| Pacific Bell v. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 325 F.3d 1114 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 April 2003 |
| In Re Vitamin Cases | Counsel for the respondent | 107 Cal. App. 4th 820 | California Court of Appeal | 3 April 2003 |
| Kamen v. Lindly | Counsel for the respondent | 94 Cal. App. 4th 197 | California Court of Appeal | 5 December 2001 |
| At&t Communications Systems, a California Corporation v. Pacific Bell, a California Opinion Corporation | Counsel for the appellant | 203 F.3d 1183 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 February 2000 |
| At&t Communications Systems, a California Corporation v. Pacific Bell, a California Opinion Corporation | Counsel for the appellant | 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1158 | California Supreme Court | 14 February 2000 |
| Apusento Garden (Guam) Inc. v. Superior Court of Guam | Counsel for the appellant | 94 F.3d 1346 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 September 1996 |
| Apusento Garden (Guam) Inc. v. Superior Court of Guam | Counsel for the appellant | 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6673 | California Supreme Court | 6 September 1996 |
| Chemical Bank v. Security Pacific National Bank | Counsel for the appellant | 20 F.3d 375 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 April 1994 |
| Metro Publishing, Ltd., a California Partnership v. San Jose Mercury News, a California Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 987 F.2d 637 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 March 1993 |
| Metro Publishing, Ltd., a California Partnership v. San Jose Mercury News, a California Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1670 | California Supreme Court | 8 March 1993 |
| New Kids on the Block v. News America Publishing, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 971 F.2d 302 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 July 1992 |
| Cukierman v. Mechanics Bank of Richmond | Counsel for the appellant | 815 F.2d 1314 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 April 1987 |
| Lads Trucking Co. v. Board of Trustees | Counsel for the respondent | 777 F.2d 1371 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 December 1985 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at pillsburylaw.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Harvard University Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1979 · 47 years on the roll.
49 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Kevin Murray Fong’s license status, bar number #91037, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records