Attorney RecordLitigation · San Diego County
Kyle Wilson Hoffman · Litigation Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Kyle Wilson Hoffman is on California’s State Bar roll, #176095, admitted in 1995; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Diego, San Diego County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Litigation. 49 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Fitzgerald Knaier LLP. Registry record updated 25 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a litigation matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 25 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #176095 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1995 |
| Law school | Univ of California Berkeley |
| Firm | Fitzgerald Knaier LLP |
| Location | San Diego, San Diego County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Rene Sanchez-Gomez | Counsel for the respondent | 798 F.3d 1204 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 August 2015 |
| United States v. Martin Alcantara-Castillo | Counsel for the respondent | 788 F.3d 1186 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 June 2015 |
| United States v. Kevin Rangel-Guzman | Counsel for the respondent | 752 F.3d 1222 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 May 2014 |
| United States v. Daniel Chovan | Counsel for the respondent | 735 F.3d 1127 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 November 2013 |
| United States v. Thomas Johnson | Counsel for the respondent | 534 F. App'x 592 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 July 2013 |
| United States v. Patrick Jones | Counsel for the respondent | 532 F. App'x 769 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 2013 |
| United States v. Venancio Rojas-Pedroza | Counsel for the respondent | 716 F.3d 1253 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 May 2013 |
| United States v. Juan Cruz-Valdivia | Counsel for the respondent | 526 F. App'x 735 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 April 2013 |
| United States v. Jose Ortiz | Counsel for the respondent | 522 F. App'x 418 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 April 2013 |
| United States v. David Yepez | Counsel for the appellant | 704 F.3d 1087 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 December 2012 |
| United States v. Isaac Camacho | Counsel for the respondent | 499 F. App'x 709 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 November 2012 |
| United States v. Antonio Vargas-Soriano | Counsel for the respondent | 486 F. App'x 685 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 November 2012 |
| United States v. Mark Forrester | Counsel for the respondent | 496 F. App'x 733 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 October 2012 |
| United States v. Mendoza | Counsel for the respondent | 484 F. App'x 101 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 May 2012 |
| United States v. Ivan Contreras-Lopez | Counsel for the respondent | 468 F. App'x 670 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 February 2012 |
| United States v. Reyes-Bonilla | Counsel for the respondent | 671 F.3d 1036 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 February 2012 |
| Antonio Rodriguez-Lugo v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 458 F. App'x 688 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 November 2011 |
| United States v. Sandoval-Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 642 F.3d 717 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 April 2011 |
| United States v. Valdovinos-Mendez | Counsel for the respondent | 641 F.3d 1031 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 April 2011 |
| United States v. Jeffrey Mitchell | Counsel for the respondent | 408 F. App'x 53 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 January 2011 |
| United States v. Vasallo-Martinez | Counsel for the respondent | 360 F. App'x 731 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 December 2009 |
| United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez | Counsel for the respondent | 586 F.3d 1176 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 November 2009 |
| United States v. Lemus | Counsel for the respondent | 582 F.3d 958 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 September 2009 |
| United States v. Garcia-Aguilar | Counsel for the respondent | 339 F. App'x 736 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 July 2009 |
| United States v. Garcia-Aguilar | Counsel for the respondent | 339 F. App'x 736 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 July 2009 |
| United States v. Miranda-Lopez | Counsel for the respondent | 336 F. App'x 674 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 2009 |
| United States v. Miranda-Lopez | Counsel for the respondent | 336 F. App'x 674 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 2009 |
| United States v. Cabrera-Alejandre | Counsel for the respondent | 334 F. App'x 816 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 June 2009 |
| United States v. Cabrera-Alejandre | Counsel for the respondent | 334 F. App'x 816 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 June 2009 |
| United States v. Biggs | Counsel for the respondent | 314 F. App'x 977 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 March 2009 |
| United States v. Biggs | Counsel for the respondent | 314 F. App'x 977 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 March 2009 |
| United States v. Renteria | Counsel for the respondent | 557 F.3d 1003 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 February 2009 |
| United States v. Macias-Curiel | Counsel for the respondent | 314 F. App'x 50 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 January 2009 |
| United States v. Macias-Curiel | Counsel for the respondent | 314 F. App'x 50 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 January 2009 |
| United States v. Miranda-Lopez | Counsel for the respondent | 532 F.3d 1034 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 July 2008 |
| United States v. Morales-Morales | Counsel for the respondent | 281 F. App'x 729 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 June 2008 |
| United States v. Boyer | Counsel for the respondent | 275 F. App'x 655 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 April 2008 |
| Manta v. Chertoff | Counsel for the respondent | 518 F.3d 1134 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 March 2008 |
| United States v. Castillo-Basa | Counsel for the respondent | 494 F.3d 1217 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 July 2007 |
| United States v. Flores-Rodriguez | Counsel for the respondent | 236 F. App'x 338 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 June 2007 |
| United States v. Garcia-Rizo | Counsel for the respondent | 203 F. App'x 121 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 October 2006 |
| United States v. Jose Luis Lopez-Zamora | Counsel for the respondent | 418 F.3d 1004 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 August 2005 |
| United States v. Lopez-Zamora | Counsel for the respondent | 141 F. App'x 601 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 August 2005 |
| United States v. Jose Luis Lopez-Zamora | Counsel for the respondent | 392 F.3d 1087 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 December 2004 |
| United States v. Rico-Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 79 F. App'x 988 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 November 2003 |
| United States v. Favio Ortega-Brito | Counsel for the respondent | 311 F.3d 1136 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 November 2002 |
| United States v. Favio Ortega-Brito | Counsel for the respondent | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11430 | California Supreme Court | 26 November 2002 |
| United States v. Pedro Velasco-Medina | Counsel for the respondent | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7311 | California Supreme Court | 12 August 2002 |
| United States v. Pedro Velasco-Medina | Counsel for the respondent | 305 F.3d 839 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 August 2002 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Fitzgerald Knaier LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at fitzgeraldknaier.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UC Berkeley School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1995 · 31 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Litigation.
49 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Diego, in San Diego County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, seated at San Diego.
Confirm Kyle Wilson Hoffman’s license status, bar number #176095, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Litigation in San Diego County: next on the roll
San Diego County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records