Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Mark C. Holscher · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Mark C. Holscher is on California’s State Bar roll, #139582, admitted in 1989; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 9 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 26 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #139582 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1989 |
| Law school | Univ of California Berkeley |
| Firm | Kirkland & Ellis LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 381 F. Supp. 3d 1240 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 8 May 2019 |
| Ochoa v. Anaheim City School District | Counsel for the respondent | 11 Cal. App. 5th 209 | California Court of Appeal | 28 April 2017 |
| Don Johnson Productions, Inc. v. Rysher Entertainment | Counsel for the appellant | 209 Cal. App. 4th 919 | California Court of Appeal | 1 October 2012 |
| Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Counsel for the respondent | 568 F.3d 1028 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 June 2009 |
| Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Counsel for the respondent | 530 F.3d 865 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 June 2008 |
| Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Counsel for the respondent | 512 F.3d 1134 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 January 2008 |
| Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Counsel for the respondent | 506 F.3d 713 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 October 2007 |
| United States v. WR Grace | Counsel for the respondent | 504 F.3d 745 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 September 2007 |
| United States v. Seal A | Counsel for the respondent | 216 F. App'x 647 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 January 2007 |
| Dziubla v. Cargill, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 214 F. App'x 658 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 December 2006 |
| United States v. Flanagan | Counsel for the defendant | 126 F. Supp. 2d 1284 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 15 December 2000 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Steve TURMAN, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7355 | California Supreme Court | 12 September 1997 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Steve TURMAN, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 122 F.3d 1167 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 September 1997 |
| In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. United States of America v. Rockwell International Corporation, Rocketdyne Division, and John Doe | Counsel for the appellant | 119 F.3d 750 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 1997 |
| In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. United States of America v. Rockwell International Corporation, Rocketdyne Division, and John Doe | Counsel for the appellant | 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5460 | California Supreme Court | 10 July 1997 |
| United States v. Robert Steve Turman | Counsel for the respondent | 104 F.3d 1191 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 January 1997 |
| United States v. Robert Steve Turman | Counsel for the respondent | 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 426 | California Supreme Court | 17 January 1997 |
| United States v. Milton Zucker Mende | Counsel for the respondent | 43 F.3d 1298 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 January 1995 |
| United States v. Milton Zucker Mende | Counsel for the respondent | 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 55 | California Supreme Court | 3 January 1995 |
| United States v. Andre Smith | Counsel for the respondent | 991 F.2d 1468 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 April 1993 |
| United States v. Andre Smith | Counsel for the respondent | 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9843 | California Supreme Court | 9 December 1992 |
| United States v. Andre Smith | Counsel for the respondent | 982 F.2d 354 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 December 1992 |
| United States v. Rodney Bourgeois | Counsel for the respondent | 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4252 | California Supreme Court | 19 May 1992 |
| United States v. Rodney Bourgeois | Counsel for the respondent | 964 F.2d 935 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 May 1992 |
| United States v. Jeffrey Jenkins | Counsel for the respondent | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5322 | California Supreme Court | 5 July 1991 |
| United States v. Jeffrey Jenkins | Counsel for the respondent | 938 F.2d 934 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 July 1991 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Litigation: General Commercial (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 4, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at kirkland.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UC Berkeley School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1989 · 37 years on the roll.
9 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
26 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Mark C. Holscher’s license status, bar number #139582, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records