Attorney RecordLitigation · San Mateo County
Mark C. Molumphy · Litigation Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Mark C. Molumphy is on California’s State Bar roll, #168009, admitted in 1993; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Burlingame, San Mateo County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Litigation. This profile lists one third-party recognition, in Chambers USA 2026, as published by Chambers and Partners. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a litigation matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #168009 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1993 |
| Law school | Univ of San Francisco |
| Firm | Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP |
| Location | Burlingame, San Mateo County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Police Ret. Sys. of St. Louis v. Page | Counsel for the respondent | 22 Cal. App. 5th 336 | California Court of Appeal | 16 April 2018 |
| Broadway Grill, Inc. v. Visa Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 856 F.3d 1274 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 May 2017 |
| Terra Insurance v. New York Life Investment Management LLC | Counsel for the plaintiff | 717 F. Supp. 2d 883 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 11 May 2010 |
| Matthew Roberts v. Foxhollow Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 359 F. App'x 802 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 December 2009 |
| Furman v. Walton | Counsel for the appellant | 320 F. App'x 638 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 March 2009 |
| Furman v. Walton | Counsel for the appellant | 320 F. App'x 638 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 March 2009 |
| In Re Homestore. Com, Inc. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 347 F. Supp. 2d 814 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 October 2004 |
| In re Homestore.com, Inc. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 225 F.R.D. 252 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 17 July 2004 |
| In Re HOMESTORE.COM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION | Counsel for the plaintiff | 347 F. Supp. 2d 811 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 27 May 2004 |
| In Re HOMESTORE.COM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION | Counsel for the plaintiff | 347 F. Supp. 2d 790 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 11 May 2004 |
| In Re HOMESTORE.COM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION | Counsel for the plaintiff | 347 F. Supp. 2d 769 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 11 May 2004 |
| Merrill v. Navegar, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 26 Cal. 4th 465 | California Supreme Court | 6 August 2001 |
| Holmes v. Lerner | Counsel for the appellant | 74 Cal. App. 4th 442 | California Court of Appeal | 7 September 1999 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 2, Litigation: Securities Mainly Plaintiffs (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at cpmlegal.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is University of San Francisco School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1993 · 33 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Litigation.
13 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Burlingame, in San Mateo County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, seated at Redwood City.
Confirm Mark C. Molumphy’s license status, bar number #168009, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Litigation in San Mateo County: next on the roll
San Mateo County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records