Attorney RecordCriminal Defense · San Diego County
Martha M. Hall · Criminal Defense Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Martha M. Hall is on California’s State Bar roll, #138012, admitted in 1988; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Diego, San Diego County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Criminal Defense. 38 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a criminal defense matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #138012 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1988 |
| Law school | Duke Univ |
| Firm | Law Offices of Martha M. Hall |
| Location | San Diego, San Diego County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duy Pham v. Leland McEwen | Counsel for the appellant | 588 F. App'x 737 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 December 2014 |
| United States v. Jose Davalos-Martinez | Counsel for the appellant | 537 F. App'x 773 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 August 2013 |
| United States v. Gregorio Garcia-Haro | Counsel for the appellant | 535 F. App'x 596 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2013 |
| United States v. Jorge Farias | Counsel for the appellant | 502 F. App'x 682 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 December 2012 |
| Joseph Duran v. Matthew Cate | Counsel for the respondent | 491 F. App'x 842 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 November 2012 |
| United States v. Yasquez | Counsel for the appellant | 654 F.3d 880 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 August 2011 |
| United States v. Kenneth Moore | Counsel for the appellant | 365 F. App'x 800 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 February 2010 |
| United States v. Villegas-Tirado | Counsel for the appellant | 332 F. App'x 416 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 August 2009 |
| United States v. Villegas-Tirado | Counsel for the appellant | 332 F. App'x 416 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 August 2009 |
| United States v. Sanchez-Campos | Counsel for the appellant | 295 F. App'x 166 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 September 2008 |
| United States v. De Dios-Samaniego | Counsel for the appellant | 271 F. App'x 695 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 March 2008 |
| United States v. Rafael Cruz-Escoto | Counsel for the appellant | 476 F.3d 1081 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 February 2007 |
| United States v. Bates | Counsel for the appellant | 221 F. App'x 538 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 February 2007 |
| Duy Pham v. Ryan | Counsel for the appellant | 203 F. App'x 769 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 October 2006 |
| United States v. Diaz-Martinez | Counsel for the appellant | 188 F. App'x 635 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 July 2006 |
| United States v. Neyarez-Montoya | Counsel for the appellant | 140 F. App'x 650 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 July 2005 |
| United States v. Vincent Franklin Bennett | Counsel for the appellant | 363 F.3d 947 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 April 2004 |
| United States v. Domingo Lopez-Osuna | Counsel for the appellant | 242 F.3d 1191 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 March 2001 |
| United States v. Domingo Lopez-Osuna | Counsel for the appellant | 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8961 | California Supreme Court | 7 November 2000 |
| United States v. Domingo Lopez-Osuna | Counsel for the appellant | 232 F.3d 657 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 November 2000 |
| United States v. Lawrence Ezekiel Reid, United States of America v. Wayne Blake | Counsel for the appellant | 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7702 | California Supreme Court | 14 September 2000 |
| United States v. Lawrence Ezekiel Reid, United States of America v. Wayne Blake | Counsel for the appellant | 226 F.3d 1020 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 September 2000 |
| United States v. Hermelinda Valdivia, Hermelinda Valdivia v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5465 | California Supreme Court | 14 July 1995 |
| United States v. Hermelinda Valdivia, Hermelinda Valdivia v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 60 F.3d 594 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 July 1995 |
| United States v. Lee Howard Montgomery, Howard Lee Montgomery, AKA Lee Howard Montgomery v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5310 | California Supreme Court | 13 July 1993 |
| United States v. Lee Howard Montgomery, Howard Lee Montgomery, AKA Lee Howard Montgomery v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 998 F.2d 1468 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 July 1993 |
| United States v. Juan Rubio-Villareal | Counsel for the appellant | 967 F.2d 294 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 June 1992 |
| United States v. Juan Rubio-Villareal | Counsel for the appellant | 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4873 | California Supreme Court | 11 June 1992 |
| United States v. German Arias-Granados, AKA German Hernandez and Miguel Rosas-Arenos, AKA Carlos Lopez-Ramirez | Counsel for the appellant | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6467 | California Supreme Court | 13 August 1991 |
| United States v. German Arias-Granados, AKA German Hernandez and Miguel Rosas-Arenos, AKA Carlos Lopez-Ramirez | Counsel for the appellant | 941 F.2d 996 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 August 1991 |
| United States v. Susana Sanchez-Robles | Counsel for the appellant | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1909 | California Supreme Court | 20 March 1991 |
| United States v. Susana Sanchez-Robles | Counsel for the appellant | 927 F.2d 1070 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 March 1991 |
| United States v. Juan Rubio-Villareal | Counsel for the appellant | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1783 | California Supreme Court | 13 March 1991 |
| United States v. Juan Rubio-Villareal | Counsel for the appellant | 927 F.2d 1495 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 March 1991 |
| United States v. Jeff Brice, Jr. | Counsel for the appellant | 926 F.2d 925 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 February 1991 |
| United States v. Jeff Brice, Jr. | Counsel for the appellant | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1642 | California Supreme Court | 28 February 1991 |
| United States v. Linda Lockard | Counsel for the appellant | 910 F.2d 542 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 September 1990 |
| United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-Sandoval | Counsel for the appellant | 894 F.2d 1043 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 January 1990 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Law Offices of Martha M. Hall.
The law school on the record is Duke University.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1988 · 38 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Criminal Defense.
38 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Diego, in San Diego County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, seated at San Diego.
Confirm Martha M. Hall’s license status, bar number #138012, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Criminal Defense in San Diego County: next on the roll
San Diego County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records