Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Matthew D. Umhofer · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Matthew D. Umhofer is on California’s State Bar roll, #206607, admitted in 2000; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Criminal Defense and Litigation. This profile lists one third-party recognition, in Chambers USA 2026, as published by Chambers and Partners. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a criminal defense matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #206607 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 2000 |
| Law school | Georgetown Univ |
| Firm | Umhofer, Mitchell & King LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Victor Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of La | Counsel for the respondent | 759 F.3d 1112 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 July 2014 |
| P. Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of L. A. | Counsel for the respondent | 392 F. App'x 524 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 August 2010 |
| United States v. Rodriguez | Counsel for the respondent | 390 F. App'x 652 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 July 2010 |
| Abuhawa v. Holder | Counsel for the respondent | 378 F. App'x 741 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 May 2010 |
| Tadefa v. United States Parole Commission | Counsel for the respondent | 333 F. App'x 274 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2009 |
| United States v. Ruehle | Counsel for the respondent | 583 F.3d 600 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2009 |
| Tadefa v. United States Parole Commission | Counsel for the respondent | 333 F. App'x 274 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2009 |
| United States v. Nicholas | Counsel for the defendant | 606 F. Supp. 2d 1109 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 1 April 2009 |
| United States v. Nicholas | Counsel for the defendant | 594 F. Supp. 2d 1116 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 December 2008 |
| United States v. Martinez-Zamora | Counsel for the respondent | 317 F. App'x 622 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 November 2008 |
| United States v. Martinez-Zamora | Counsel for the respondent | 317 F. App'x 622 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 November 2008 |
| Securities & Exchange Commission v. Nicholas | Counsel for the defendant | 569 F. Supp. 2d 1065 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 4 August 2008 |
| United States v. Woods | Counsel for the respondent | 213 F. App'x 538 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2006 |
| United States v. Thai Tung Luong | Counsel for the appellant | 470 F.3d 898 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 December 2006 |
| United States v. Abbas | Counsel for the respondent | 208 F. App'x 552 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 November 2006 |
| United States v. Campbell | Counsel for the respondent | 208 F. App'x 550 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 November 2006 |
| United States v. Mireles-Martinez | Counsel for the respondent | 199 F. App'x 612 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 August 2006 |
| United States v. Lopez-Lopez | Counsel for the respondent | 180 F. App'x 680 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 May 2006 |
| United States v. Martinez | Counsel for the respondent | 155 F. App'x 298 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 November 2005 |
| United States v. Daniel Luis Delaney | Counsel for the respondent | 427 F.3d 1224 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 November 2005 |
| United States v. Nava | Counsel for the respondent | 151 F. App'x 533 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 October 2005 |
| United States v. Quinones | Counsel for the respondent | 135 F. App'x 64 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 June 2005 |
| United States v. Garcia-Salas | Counsel for the respondent | 126 F. App'x 811 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 March 2005 |
| United States v. Callahan | Counsel for the respondent | 125 F. App'x 137 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 March 2005 |
| United States v. Lawrence | Counsel for the respondent | 118 F. App'x 240 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 December 2004 |
| United States v. Jones | Counsel for the respondent | 117 F. App'x 549 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 December 2004 |
| United States v. Quinones | Counsel for the respondent | 106 F. App'x 618 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 August 2004 |
| United States v. McLaughlin | Counsel for the respondent | 97 F. App'x 769 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 May 2004 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 6, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Umhofer, Mitchell & King LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Umhofer, Mitchell & King LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at umklaw.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Georgetown University Law Center.
Admitted to the California Bar in 2000 · 26 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Criminal Defense and Litigation.
28 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Matthew D. Umhofer’s license status, bar number #206607, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Criminal Defense in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records