Attorney RecordIntellectual Property · San Francisco County

Matthew I. Kreeger · Intellectual Property Attorney

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Matthew I. Kreeger is on California’s State Bar roll, #153793, admitted in 1991; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Intellectual Property. 10 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Morrison & Foerster LLP. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a intellectual property matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#153793
License statusActive
Admitted1991
Law schoolHarvard Univ Law School
FirmMorrison & Foerster LLP
LocationSan Francisco, San Francisco County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitemofo.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.Counsel for the plaintiff258 F. Supp. 3d 1013U.S. District Court, Northern District of California23 June 2017
Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Counsel for the defendant256 F. Supp. 3d 1059U.S. District Court, Northern District of California8 June 2017
Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Counsel for the defendant252 F. Supp. 3d 934U.S. District Court, Northern District of California11 May 2017
Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Counsel for the defendant319 F.R.D. 284U.S. District Court, Northern District of California10 April 2017
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.Counsel for the plaintiff67 F. Supp. 3d 1100U.S. District Court, Northern District of California8 September 2014
National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp.Counsel for the defendant582 F. Supp. 2d 1185U.S. District Court, Northern District of California2 October 2007
Alfaro v. TerhuneCounsel for the appellant98 Cal. App. 4th 492California Court of Appeal16 May 2002
Carnegie Mellon University v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.Counsel for the defendant55 F. Supp. 2d 1024U.S. District Court, Northern District of California12 May 1999
Jerry Emanuel POLLARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theo WHITE, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeCounsel for the appellant97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5906California Supreme Court25 July 1997
Jerry Emanuel POLLARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theo WHITE, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeCounsel for the appellant119 F.3d 1430U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 July 1997

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Morrison & Foerster LLP.

The law school on the record is Harvard University Law School.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1991 · 35 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Intellectual Property.

10 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Matthew I. Kreeger’s license status, bar number #153793, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Intellectual Property in San Francisco County: next on the roll

San Francisco County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records