Attorney RecordLitigation · San Francisco County
Michael Francis Ram · Litigation Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Michael Francis Ram is on California’s State Bar roll, #104805, admitted in 1982; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Litigation. 27 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Morgan & Morgan. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a litigation matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #104805 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1982 |
| Law school | Harvard Univ Law School |
| Firm | Morgan & Morgan |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing Litigation in San Francisco County
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucido v. Nestle Purina Petcare Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 217 F. Supp. 3d 1098 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 November 2016 |
| Breazeale v. Victim Services, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 198 F. Supp. 3d 1070 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 27 July 2016 |
| King v. National General Insurance Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 186 F. Supp. 3d 1062 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 May 2016 |
| Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 148 F. Supp. 3d 884 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 2 December 2015 |
| King v. National General Insurance | Counsel for the plaintiff | 129 F. Supp. 3d 925 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 15 September 2015 |
| Burgoon v. Narconon of Northern California | Counsel for the plaintiff | 125 F. Supp. 3d 974 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 27 August 2015 |
| Gene Edwards v. Ford Motor Company | Counsel for the appellant | 603 F. App'x 538 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 February 2015 |
| Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 68 F. Supp. 3d 1121 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 September 2014 |
| Banks v. Nissan North America, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 301 F.R.D. 327 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 19 December 2013 |
| Soto v. American Honda Motor Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 946 F. Supp. 2d 949 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 3 October 2012 |
| Mario Contreras v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 484 F. App'x 116 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 June 2012 |
| Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 666 F.3d 581 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 January 2012 |
| Cohen v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California | Counsel for the petitioner | 586 F.3d 703 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 November 2009 |
| In re LDK Solar Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 255 F.R.D. 519 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 28 January 2009 |
| In Re LDK Solar Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 584 F. Supp. 2d 1230 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 July 2008 |
| Falk v. General Motors Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 496 F. Supp. 2d 1088 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 3 July 2007 |
| Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 369 F. Supp. 2d 1138 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 4 May 2005 |
| Susan Chamberlan and Henry Fok, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. Ford Motor Company, Defendant-Petitioner | Counsel for the respondent | 402 F.3d 952 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 March 2005 |
| Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 223 F.R.D. 524 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 8 September 2004 |
| Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 314 F. Supp. 2d 953 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 24 March 2004 |
| Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 150 F.3d 1011 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 June 1998 |
| National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Derwinski | Counsel for the plaintiff | 782 F. Supp. 1392 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 January 1992 |
| National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Derwinski | Counsel for the plaintiff | 778 F. Supp. 1096 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 21 November 1991 |
| Roth v. Veteran's Administration of the Government of the United States | Counsel for the respondent | 856 F.2d 1401 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 September 1988 |
| National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Turnage | Counsel for the plaintiff | 115 F.R.D. 543 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 April 1987 |
| Mercy-Peninsula Ambulance, Inc. v. County of San Mateo | Counsel for the respondent | 791 F.2d 755 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 June 1986 |
| National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Walters | Counsel for the plaintiff | 589 F. Supp. 1302 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 June 1984 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Morgan & Morgan.
A firm or employer website answers at forthepeople.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Harvard University Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1982 · 44 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Litigation.
27 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Michael Francis Ram’s license status, bar number #104805, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Litigation in San Francisco County: next on the roll
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records